- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump's court cases: have they had chance to present their evidence in a complete fashion?
Posted on 1/21/21 at 5:42 pm to JudgeHolden
Posted on 1/21/21 at 5:42 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:officials from more than half the states signed on to the tx case. officials from the swing states officially declared that their certification should be considered in dispute
I think they would say that if all three branches of government oppose you, well, maybe that says more about you than them
that didn't go the way you thought it would, did it
0
Posted on 1/21/21 at 5:44 pm to texridder
quote:which is of course a lie. wi sc ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and that ruling currently stands.
The claims made in the Trump lawsuits about "changes in the rules" made by states SOS are a sham
an az judge told the 2 sides in the maricopa case to "work it out" conveniently after biden was inaugurated
there is currently debate about the pa situation. i get that obtuse has a view but others have a different view - that the measure should have gone to a statewide vote and never did making the mail ins invalid
Posted on 1/22/21 at 12:57 pm to bfniii
quote:
The claims made in the Trump lawsuits about "changes in the rules" made by states SOS are a sham
quote:
which is of course a lie. wi sc ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and that ruling currently stands.
As usual, you are FOS.
The Wisc case didn't involve SOS regulations. The case involved two county elections commissioners who independently posted on Facebook advising voters they qualified for absentee voting as a result of the governor's Safer-at-Home Order.
quote:You're not even close on this one. The Maricopa case didn't have anything to do with voting regulations. It involved a legislative subpoena for voting documents and equipment.
an az judge told the 2 sides in the maricopa case to "work it out"
quote:There is no debate. The PA Supreme court ruled in October that the SOS-issued guidance concerning signature matching was not in violation of the Pennsylvania elections code.
there is currently debate about the pa situation.
You're a jackass for calling someone a liar when you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 1:13 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
They probably never envisioned multiple state legislatures changing procedure and that the supreme court would refuse to hear it at all
“ Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” - John Adams
Posted on 1/22/21 at 1:13 pm to texridder
quote:what i told you were facts genius
As usual, you are FOS
quote:key phrase here which is of course what everyone is referring to, not your stupid narrow semantics
Safer-at-Home Order
quote:exactly. They were told to turn the instruments over and said they would go to jail first. Another example of a state's funny business. Again, the type of behavior being referred to itt.
legislative subpoena for voting documents and equipment
quote:says you. And you're not known for having an intelligence level above a garden slug
There is no debate
quote:ok Mr. "I'm going to need a link to fraud evidence." Lol
You're a jackass for calling someone a liar when you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
You are a clown of a person
Posted on 1/22/21 at 1:35 pm to davyjones
quote:
Before I answer ...
I agree.
I personally would have had no problem signing the TX v PA pleadings but would have preferred to remove the "quadrillion" exhibit. That is assuming I had explained my honest opinion of the chances of success to the plaintiff(s). I would not have signed the Kraken suits but that's because I saw them as trash legal work, especially the WI filing. Just because I think a case is doomed doesn't mean it is frivolous and definitely not a breach of cannons.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 1:40 pm to texridder
Tex, please tell me you get paid for this routine of acting like a moron. I'll buy that
Have you ever convinced anyone on this board of anything? Have you ever made even 1 salient point?
Have you ever convinced anyone on this board of anything? Have you ever made even 1 salient point?
Posted on 1/22/21 at 1:42 pm to bfniii
quote:
can't wait
If you are a Powell fan and know who Tom Clare is you might not be so excited.
Posted on 1/22/21 at 2:40 pm to bfniii
quote:You didn't actually provide an answer a single one of my responses. Just like always. You just post shite.
Have you ever made even 1 salient point?
You are a chickenshit useless weasel.
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:17 am to Obtuse1
quote:well we'll see who has the facts on their side. my guess is, this never makes it to trial. i wouldn't be surprised at all if both sides settle out of court so they can both save face and continue pointing the finger at each other.
If you are a Powell fan and know who Tom Clare is you might not be so excited
but one dynamic has certainly emerged - it will be interesting to see if anyone ever trusts dominion again
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:19 am to bfniii
quote:
well we'll see who has the facts on their side.
Do you think Tom Clare had a very candid, privileged conversation with Dominion officials before he agreed to represent them?
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:22 am to texridder
quote:prove it. debunk one thing i've ever said.
You just post shite
you can't. you never have. you have nothing. you are a fraud and a joke of a personality around here. you are widely considered to be the worst. how does that feel loser.
quote:says the person who is still asking for "links" to fraud evidence despite it being discussed endlessly for 2 months on the election board. there were daily threads with videos and pictures and eyewitness testimony.
You are a chickenshit useless weasel
everyone sees right through that phag. everyone knows that if you really wanted to know the truth, you would just go see it. it's all still out there for you to examine. but you won't because you would have to admit you've been wrong this whole time and your fragile ego would collapse. the ironic thing is, you would immediately be respected by normal people
again, do you get paid to be this stupid or are you really just stupid.
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:24 am to boosiebadazz
quote:i think dominion has been all bluster so far. mypillowguy is telling them to bring it on. so far, they haven't done jack crap.
o you think Tom Clare had a very candid, privileged conversation with Dominion officials before he agreed to represent them?
and the way the judges treated the election cases, i don't have faith that justice or truth will prevail, if that's what you're asking. everyone is in cya mode right now, including judges
Posted on 1/23/21 at 10:51 am to Obtuse1
quote:
I certainly think there was an overt attempt to do exactly that, and Dominion has called that raise in Federal Court which is for one of two reasons:
1. They along with their attorney Tom Clare have decided they can stand up to discovery and will knock Powell over like a bowling pin
2. Dominion sees nothing left to lose and are talking the shot in court, even seeing it as a long shot, since they face bankruptcy if they don't at least try
#2 would be a far more enticing bet if it weren't for the fact Tom Clare (Clare Locke) took the case.
Oh, number 1 is definitely what is happening. What do they have to fear in discovery? The claims that Sidney Powell made were so outlandish that they don't have to go into source code or system vulnerabilities. She claimed that there were "no bid" contracts, that the system was developed to rig Venezuela elections, and that Dominion was actively engaged in an effort to switch votes.
IMO, they aren't going to settle with Sidney unless she gives them enough copies of texts, emails, and phone calls to go after My Pillow guy, Rudy, and Trump. Otherwise they will destroy her and take every last penny she has.
Posted on 1/23/21 at 11:00 am to mmcgrath
quote:
IMO, they aren't going to settle with Sidney unless she gives them enough copies of texts, emails, and phone calls to go after My Pillow guy, Rudy, and Trump. Otherwise they will destroy her and take every last penny she has.
No they won't. She'll represent herself. Texas will gladly come in and testify about the charade that is Dominion. Texas rejected them once with a list of items to correct. Dominion came back claiming that all programming had been completed as requested ....Dominion lied and was kicked out of consideration for ballot counting. Dominion will not win anything of consequence and no one will ever know.
Posted on 1/23/21 at 11:06 am to Obtuse1
quote:
2. Dominion sees nothing left to lose and are talking the shot in court, even seeing it as a long shot, since they face bankruptcy if they don't at least try
Why would they be going bankrupt? They just provided the machines and system to keep any democrat in office for life and not a single court wants to hear anything counter to "election was most secure ever"
Posted on 1/23/21 at 11:27 am to bfniii
They filed a lawsuit and willingly exposed themselves to the *vaunted* discovery process. Does that suggest anything to you?
Posted on 1/23/21 at 11:32 am to bluedragon
quote:
No they won't. She'll represent herself. Texas will gladly come in and testify about the charade that is Dominion. Texas rejected them once with a list of items to correct. Dominion came back claiming that all programming had been completed as requested ....Dominion lied and was kicked out of consideration for ballot counting. Dominion will not win anything of consequence and no one will ever know.
A) Texas will not go near Powell on their own.
B) Not making modifications to their system has nothing to do with their case.
Again, Powell made outlandish claims about the company's history, no bid contracts, and active involvement in rigging the election. They don't have to go into their software to tear Powell apart.
Posted on 1/23/21 at 4:00 pm to mmcgrath
quote:chinese connections in ga have already been established so that's no so outrageous
She claimed that there were "no bid" contracts
quote:iirc, that has been pretty well established too, so yet another non controversial point
that the system was developed to rig Venezuela elections
quote:while proof of the cause is being debated, the effect was most certainly observed and documented.
Dominion was actively engaged in an effort to switch votes
quote:
they aren't going to settle with Sidney unless she gives them enough copies of texts, emails, and phone calls to go after My Pillow guy
mypillowguy is daring them to sue him quote:as i have been saying, they haven't done squat yet. and even if they do, there's no reason to expect justice to prevail. the establishment and the deep state will probably have a say in that
Otherwise they will destroy her and take every last penny she has
Posted on 1/23/21 at 4:02 pm to bluedragon
quote:these people seem to forget all the skyscreaming on the left about how unsecure dominion was before 2020. now, "most secure election evar!"
Texas rejected them once with a list of items to correct. Dominion came back claiming that all programming had been completed as requested ....Dominion lied
and then you have a bunch of knuckleheads on this board running around shilling for them in the face of an avalance of irregularities that none of them will touch with a 10' pole.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News