Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Trump's Coal Comeback

Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:48 am
Posted by LLeD
Member since Apr 2026
504 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 1:48 am
On June 4th, US President Donald Trump announced a $700 million investment package in the Oval Office to strengthen the American coal industry. The message is unequivocal: energy should remain affordable, reliable, and domestically produced.

A strategy that protects jobs instead of destroying them

According to the US government, the funds are intended to secure 42 coal mines and more than 14,000 jobs. The promise is that this will save American electricity customers over $50 billion in energy costs. $485 million alone will go toward maintaining existing power plants in ten states – from Arizona to Kentucky to West Virginia. Imagine that: a government that sees jobs in its own industry not as a nuisance, but as an asset worth protecting.

"Today we are taking historic steps to harness the power of clean, beautiful coal to lower energy prices and the cost of living for all Americans," Trump declared at the event. In addition, $185 million in private investment is earmarked for the first new coal-fired power plants since 2013 in Alaska and West Virginia. A long-planned export terminal in the Port of Oakland, California, will receive $75 million to ship American coal to the Pacific region.

Back in April, Trump had already declared coal reserves and power generation a matter of national security by executive order, citing the Defense Production Act of 1950. Coal's market share in US power generation has fallen from around 50 percent in 2008 to about 15 percent in 2026. Where others would capitulate, Washington sees a strategic reserve that it will not squander lightly.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright minced no words, drawing a connection between the expansion of wind and solar energy and rising electricity prices. Americans, Wright argued, are angry about high electricity prices – and blame the closure of reliable power plants in favor of subsidized, unreliable ones.

The predictable resistance
As expected, environmental groups spoke out and announced legal action. The Sierra Club called the investment package "disgusting and reprehensible." The industry itself, however, explicitly welcomed the measures. Rich Nolan, president of the National Mining Association, emphasized that coal-fired power generation protects consumers from volatile energy prices and supply shortages – an argument that is gaining weight in light of the growing electricity demand from artificial intelligence and the tense situation in the Middle East.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18356 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 3:53 am to
quote:

will save American electricity customers over $50 billion in energy costs.

I’d like to see the math on that one.
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7679 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 4:46 am to
Sorry, coal is dirty af, go look at India if you want to see what overconsumption of coal looks like. We need to be transitioning to combined cycle coal/nat gas and ultimately nat gas
Posted by tgdawg68
Georgia
Member since Dec 2019
867 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 5:47 am to
quote:

Sorry, coal is dirty af, go look at India if you want to see what overconsumption of coal looks like. We need to be transitioning to combined cycle coal/nat gas and ultimately nat gas


We are already doing that. Almost all new generation being built or proposed in gas fired but keeping coal in the mix is smart. Also, we have better pollution controls and stricter standards than India so that's not really a good comparison.

Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18356 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 6:03 am to
quote:

Sorry, coal is dirty af, go look at India if you want to see what overconsumption of coal looks like. We need to be transitioning to combined cycle coal/nat gas and ultimately nat gas

NG gen units are 5 years back ordered right now and have been for a while. There’s no lack of demand for them. It’s a supply issue. Also we really need a more is more approach and throw everything at this problem or retail utility rates are going to sky rocket in the coming years.

Also most of indias pollution is from agriculture and vehicle emissions. And probably some methane from human feces on the ground everywhere.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19607 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 6:13 am to
“ Sorry, coal is dirty af, go look at India if you want to see what overconsumption of coal looks like. We need to be transitioning to combined cycle coal/nat gas and ultimately nat gas”

Today’s usage of coal is not just burning and allowing emissions straight out of the smokestack, really hasn’t been that way for awhile, scrubbers, filtering clean it aggressively
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
17832 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 6:34 am to
quote:

scrubbers

I worked on a lot of these going back over 40 years. The result of cleaning up the emissions made us a solid living building scrubbers to clean up the emissions.
Thanks to the environmentalists like Greenpeace..
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55966 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 7:16 am to
quote:

I’d like to see the math on that one.

I think we should be using coal, but I’m against the US government subsidizing it. Let it stand on its own - or fail.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
24492 posts
Posted on 6/6/26 at 7:19 am to
quote:

Today’s usage of coal is not just burning and allowing emissions straight out of the smokestack, really hasn’t been that way for awhile, scrubbers, filtering clean it aggressively


Yea the guy that posted it is a clueless dem. Anyone involved in any manufacturing industry knows that the scrubbers and filters are on pretty much everything. America manufacturing is as clean as it gets.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram