
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump won bigly at Supreme Court today.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 10:59 am
Posted on 9/25/26 at 10:59 am
Screw those a-hole female left wing reporters.
Trump is happy right now!
Trump is happy right now!
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:03 am to Dawglovertoo
Great recap. Thanks for the information.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:03 am to Dawglovertoo
Reuters: Trump Victory
WASHINGTON, Sept 25 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court revived on Friday an expanded immigration database that President Donald Trump’s administration said aims to combat voting by noncitizens but critics contend could disenfranchise eligible voters.
The justices granted the Justice Department’s request to block a judge’s order that had stopped state officials from using Social Security numbers and other information to conduct sweeping checks of the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records.
The administration’s data-sharing arrangement is one in a series of actions boosting the federal government’s involvement in voting ahead of November’s midterm elections in which Trump’s fellow Republicans seek to maintain control of Congress. The U.S. Constitution gives individual states the primary authority to run and administer elections.
WASHINGTON, Sept 25 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court revived on Friday an expanded immigration database that President Donald Trump’s administration said aims to combat voting by noncitizens but critics contend could disenfranchise eligible voters.
The justices granted the Justice Department’s request to block a judge’s order that had stopped state officials from using Social Security numbers and other information to conduct sweeping checks of the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records.
The administration’s data-sharing arrangement is one in a series of actions boosting the federal government’s involvement in voting ahead of November’s midterm elections in which Trump’s fellow Republicans seek to maintain control of Congress. The U.S. Constitution gives individual states the primary authority to run and administer elections.
This post was edited on 9/25/26 at 11:04 am
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:03 am to Dawglovertoo
Hopefully this also keeps them on the sidelines and out of the broadcast booths during sports.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:05 am to Tylenol Jefferson
quote:
Hopefully this also keeps them on the sidelines and out of the broadcast booths during sports.
Unfortunately, today's ruling didn't relate to that.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:06 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
stopped state officials from using Social Security numbers and other information to conduct sweeping checks of the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records
The privacy act of 1974 permits the use of PII for law enforcement purposes, which can be anything the federal government wants it to be.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:09 am to IvoryBillMatt
Can someone please explain to me how the government knowing your SSN to check your citizenship status is disenfranchising when it’s the government that gives you that number?
That’s rhetorical of course; I know these people are full of shite. I don’t like the government as much as the next person, but this is just a dumb argument.
That’s rhetorical of course; I know these people are full of shite. I don’t like the government as much as the next person, but this is just a dumb argument.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:11 am to IvoryBillMatt
I am enjoying watching MSNOW whine about the ruling.
How sweet it is!
How sweet it is!
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:19 am to IvoryBillMatt
Marc Elias and Norm Eisen will not be happ with this
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:22 am to IvoryBillMatt
Based acb was gonna vote against the infinity illegals in America act but someone showed her a picture of a crying Haitian kid with dirt on her face and she reportedly said “no human is illegal”
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:26 am to el Gaucho
Did this bit(h actually vote against Trump again?
Posted on 9/25/26 at 11:34 am to tigersmanager
I just read this. Thankfully she voted correctly.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. The database has long been seen to fall under federal privacy laws, she wrote, and there are real risks that legitimate voter registrations could be mistakenly revoked.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. The database has long been seen to fall under federal privacy laws, she wrote, and there are real risks that legitimate voter registrations could be mistakenly revoked.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 12:37 pm to Laugh More
quote:
Can someone please explain to me how the government knowing your SSN to check your citizenship status is disenfranchising when it’s the government that gives you that number?
That’s rhetorical of course; I know these people are full of shite. I don’t like the government as much as the next person, but this is just a dumb argument.
I laughed at this as well. And the other ruling, the IRS cannot share information with DHS. Thats akin to telling a company finance is not allowed to audit their sales department or look at any of their info. What kind of asinine ruling is that?
At some point the executive branch needs to just ignore the lower courts and continue to proceed, let the supreme court tell them to stop. Same with all these nationwide TROs, let the supreme court handle it, until then proceed as usual. Eventually the supreme court will have to address nationwide TROs or it will be all they deal with and their docet will be filled for years.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 4:55 pm to Dawglovertoo
The 3 dissenters on this case were the usual suspects. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Since they are against government databases right now.... It might be a great time for SCOTUS to review those illegal databases that ATF and FBI have of gun owner records.
Since they are against government databases right now.... It might be a great time for SCOTUS to review those illegal databases that ATF and FBI have of gun owner records.

Popular
Back to top
6












