- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump was right again - Tucker interview now at 249 million views
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:20 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:20 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
How dumb do you have to believe that the trump-tucker interview got 249 million views?
How do you mongoloids dress yourselves in the morning?
The 1969 moon landings got 400 million viewers *worldwide*
and you retards think this got more, lmfao
Nice coming from a dem-lite that believes Biden got more votes than Obama.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:20 pm to Tandemjay
quote:
dem-lite
You can remove the -lite part, he's never hidden it well.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:22 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
How dumb do you have to believe that the trump-tucker interview got 249 million views?
Prove he got less

Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:25 pm to the808bass
quote:The consternation about which says more about you than any data
I know what number it’s not.
249M
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 pm to boosiebadazz
I'd say the people spending all day fighting over the difference between views and watches are slightly triggered as well, wouldn't you?
The views number is easily provable, btw. It's right there on the tweet. Now if you think that number is rigged, well I don't know where that puts us.
The views number is easily provable, btw. It's right there on the tweet. Now if you think that number is rigged, well I don't know where that puts us.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 pm to hawgfaninc
Oh shite. Watch out. Some people get their panty's in a twist when you say views. They see "views" and they run to their bedrooms to put on their pearl necklaces just so they can clutch them whenever they scream that impressions aren't views.
shite reminds me of when I once saw a star trek fan scream and rampage when some random guy didn't know exactly how a warp drive worked.
shite reminds me of when I once saw a star trek fan scream and rampage when some random guy didn't know exactly how a warp drive worked.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
I have zero consternation.
I am fascinated with the degree of immunity your groupthink has against the obvious truth of situation after situation after situation.
I am fascinated with the degree of immunity your groupthink has against the obvious truth of situation after situation after situation.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:29 pm to the808bass
quote:I assure you that I have no "groupthink".
I am fascinated with the degree of immunity your groupthink has against the obvious truth of situation after situation after situation.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:30 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
I can assure you that you do.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:34 pm to David_DJS
quote:
The video player has to be at least 50% on their screen for two seconds to be counted as a view, so X can report all sorts of views of their content when people are just scrolling through their feed.
I was asking about the metrics on it, the OP mentioned a specific 14.8 million views. Just wondering what data was extrapolated to get that number.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:36 pm to Hickok
quote:
I was asking about the metrics on it, the OP mentioned a specific 14.8 million views. Just wondering what data was extrapolated to get that number.
It is a guess
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:39 pm to Hickok
quote:
I was asking about the metrics on it, the OP mentioned a specific 14.8 million views. Just wondering what data was extrapolated to get that number.
Yeah, me too. I imagine X is purposefully vague about how it all works.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I watched the whole thing on Youtube, which I am sure millions did as well. There is also Rumble, Truth Social, etc, where millions more watched. So 200 million is probably an underestimate you simp.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:45 pm to ELVIS U
quote:
So 200 million is probably an underestimate you simp
200 million what? That watched the interview? Had the interview in their feed?
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:49 pm to Lou Pai
All of a sudden, everyone are experts on analytics. You fricking idiots have no clue. A shite ton of people watched the interview and you figs can’t stand it. Deal with it f a g s!
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:13 pm to hawgfaninc
I watched it 2X to make the view count go up and to annoy all the count-deniers.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:21 pm to hawgfaninc
Lying again
Trump seems to be one those people that even when the truth would be extremely beneficial to his cause, he would rather lie.
Trump seems to be one those people that even when the truth would be extremely beneficial to his cause, he would rather lie.
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:22 pm to DotBling
quote:
Suddenly you’re all analytics experts.
That’s actually what I do.
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 11:24 pm
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:22 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
Lying again
K rmndlr
Popular
Back to top


1










