Started By
Message

re: Trump was right again - Tucker interview now at 249 million views

Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:20 pm to
Posted by Tandemjay
Member since Jun 2022
4639 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

How dumb do you have to believe that the trump-tucker interview got 249 million views?

How do you mongoloids dress yourselves in the morning?

The 1969 moon landings got 400 million viewers *worldwide*

and you retards think this got more, lmfao


Nice coming from a dem-lite that believes Biden got more votes than Obama.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14953 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

dem-lite


You can remove the -lite part, he's never hidden it well.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84590 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

How dumb do you have to believe that the trump-tucker interview got 249 million views?


Prove he got less


Joe Biden 81 million in 2020 and general fallacy of “proving” a negative

Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

I know what number it’s not.

249M
The consternation about which says more about you than any data
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
69166 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 pm to
I'd say the people spending all day fighting over the difference between views and watches are slightly triggered as well, wouldn't you?

The views number is easily provable, btw. It's right there on the tweet. Now if you think that number is rigged, well I don't know where that puts us.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18181 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 pm to
Oh shite. Watch out. Some people get their panty's in a twist when you say views. They see "views" and they run to their bedrooms to put on their pearl necklaces just so they can clutch them whenever they scream that impressions aren't views.


shite reminds me of when I once saw a star trek fan scream and rampage when some random guy didn't know exactly how a warp drive worked.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125744 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 pm to
I have zero consternation.

I am fascinated with the degree of immunity your groupthink has against the obvious truth of situation after situation after situation.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

I am fascinated with the degree of immunity your groupthink has against the obvious truth of situation after situation after situation.

I assure you that I have no "groupthink".
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125744 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:30 pm to
I can assure you that you do.
Posted by Hickok
Htown
Member since Jan 2013
2965 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

The video player has to be at least 50% on their screen for two seconds to be counted as a view, so X can report all sorts of views of their content when people are just scrolling through their feed.

I was asking about the metrics on it, the OP mentioned a specific 14.8 million views. Just wondering what data was extrapolated to get that number.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14953 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

I was asking about the metrics on it, the OP mentioned a specific 14.8 million views. Just wondering what data was extrapolated to get that number.


It is a guess
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
21944 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

I was asking about the metrics on it, the OP mentioned a specific 14.8 million views. Just wondering what data was extrapolated to get that number.

Yeah, me too. I imagine X is purposefully vague about how it all works.
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
11655 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:40 pm to
I watched the whole thing on Youtube, which I am sure millions did as well. There is also Rumble, Truth Social, etc, where millions more watched. So 200 million is probably an underestimate you simp.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
21944 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

So 200 million is probably an underestimate you simp

200 million what? That watched the interview? Had the interview in their feed?
Posted by DotBling
Member since Oct 2019
3166 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:49 pm to
All of a sudden, everyone are experts on analytics. You fricking idiots have no clue. A shite ton of people watched the interview and you figs can’t stand it. Deal with it f a g s!
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20226 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:13 pm to
I watched it 2X to make the view count go up and to annoy all the count-deniers.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
94157 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:16 pm to
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
25950 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:21 pm to
Lying again

Trump seems to be one those people that even when the truth would be extremely beneficial to his cause, he would rather lie.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
25950 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

Suddenly you’re all analytics experts.


That’s actually what I do.
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 11:24 pm
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:22 pm to
quote:

Lying again


K rmndlr
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram