Started By
Message

re: Trump Warned U.S. Automakers Not to Raise Prices in Response to Tariffs

Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:40 pm to
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
12774 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Why is it o.k. for him to gouge American citizens with tariffs

He's forcing Americans to buy foreign cars with tariffs? Do you also understand that all that needs to happen for the tariffs to go away is foreign countries getting rid of tariffs on our products?
quote:

but the auto companies shouldn't gouge American citizens for profit?

Huh? How are these the same to you? One is a tariff, one is complete unnecessary greed. There's no reason to increase prices on US cars other than US automakers being greedy and at that point they wouldn't have a built-in advantage of having the best priced vehicles on the market. It's self-sabotage.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
54833 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:41 pm to
What these globalists in this thread are doing is sky screaming. Some companies make 80% of their cars here and only some parts are effected.

Notice how they avoid things like BCreed posted about Reagans tariffs on autos. They don't like to talk about it because they can not wrap their minds around it working.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283351 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:43 pm to
quote:


Notice how they avoid things like BCreed posted about Reagans tariffs on autos.


Let to great innovation in the Japanese mfgrs who in turn blew away the American competition.

The way around quotas is to add value, which is exactly what Japan did and very successfully.

The US quotas on Japanese cars were anti American consumer, we produced the shittiest cars of all time in the 80s.

quote:

The car quota that cost Americans
Winston has studied the impact of one of Reagan's first trade tactics against Japan -- a quota imposed in 1981 on the number of Japanese cars that could come into the U.S. every year. It was meant to give American car companies like Ford (F), GM (GM)and Chrysler (FCAU) some breathing room from foreign competitors like Toyota and Nissan.

It came at a time when the U.S. economy was in recession in the early 1980s, unemployment was rising towards 10% and inflation was high. U.S. companies were looking for any help they could get.

One result of the new trade restrictions against Japan was that American car companies hiked up car prices, pulling in record profits at the time, Winston found. They didn't have to fear losing customers to Japanese car companies.

U.S. car makers also lowered production in 1984 to help boost car prices. Less production meant fewer workers: America lost over 60,000 auto jobs between 1982 and 1984 due to the trade restrictions, according to Brookings.

Consumers got hit hard. The average car price rose by about $1,000 at the time.


LINK
This post was edited on 3/30/25 at 12:48 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
39960 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Youve just proven you have no clue what "conservative" means. Which leads you to vote for left wing populism


Says the CCP fan.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283351 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

CCP


Not conservative.

I know this destroys your little bubble..
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
9342 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

This is one of the reasons why populism sucks. Do we really want top-down pricing just to prop up a policy decision?


You complained because tariffs were going to increase prices. Now, you're complaining because Trump is working to not increase prices.

Basically, you just complain unless Trump does everything your way, even when the results are the same.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283351 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:



You complained because tariffs were going to increase prices. Now, you're complaining because Trump is working to not increase prices.


Through central planning, which is far left.

Not through market forces, which is far right.

Yall are simply Democrats pretending
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
9342 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

This is getting into the very territory that Trump's critics accused him of. This is dictatorial.


Oh my, aren't we dramatic today.

I just watched a WW2 documentary. Apparently Hitler went around encouraging companies to do the right thing for the people by reminding them of how he helped their industry all the time. It's how he consolidated power. What a tyrant.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Yikes. Not even a basic understanding of the facts. He was telling US automakers the White House would look down on prices increasing. The tariffs are on foreign auto makers.


Its pretty obvious to me who doesn't have a basic understanding of the facts.

BBonds


And since you have been asking just what Trump can do if the automakers tell him to pound sand and raise their prices instead of losing money on every vehicle they make, the EPA is under the Executive branch. The EPA is a tool he can use to frick them up 3 ways to Sunday.

That's just one way.

Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
9342 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Isn't he essentially saying, because foreign cars will be priced higher, because of tarfiffs, US makers shouldn't increase pricing as they're not facing those tariffs?


Yes, but the anti-tariff fundamentalists think prices absolutely must rise. There is simply no alternative. American companies have to raise prices. Actions only ever have one consequence to them, the worst one that lets them whine despite real world examples to the contrary.

The anti-tariff people are primarily the same ones complaining about Trump nonstop for the greater part of a decade.
Posted by frogtown
Member since Aug 2017
5436 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Notice how they avoid things like BCreed posted about Reagans tariffs on autos.


No one is avoiding it. You are ignoring the fact Reagan's quotas cost American consumers.

FWIW, the Japanese were going to move some production to the US without the Reagan quotas. Labor costs for Japanese workers in the auto sector were higher than their American counterparts in the US in 1980. They wanted to capture that.
This post was edited on 3/30/25 at 1:17 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
54833 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

No one is avoiding it. You are ignoring the fact Reagan's quotas cost American consumers.


Yeah but it didn't. Every last one of you few can not see a total picture if it was shown to you 247!


You just aren't capable of of looking past your nose.


quote:

FWIW, the Japanese were going to move some production to the US without the Reagan quotas. Labor costs for Japanese workers in the auto sector were higher than their American counterparts in the US in 1980. They wanted to capture that.


I ignore nothing. I look at a complete picture.

Created 100k+ jobs and around 150k with supporting. They continue to expand.

The Japanese gov heavily substized their industry.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
17156 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Heres a way to lowers costs…eliminate dealerships. Straight to consumer with a set price. Dealerships remain only to provide service

Courts won’t let them in many states.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

What these globalists in this thread are doing is sky screaming. Some companies make 80% of their cars here and only some parts are effected.

Name them. Then tell us why that's a good thing. Are you advocating for the US auto market to be truncated down to just a couple brands that escape most or all of the tariffs?

Data I saw, culled from NHTSA had one brand, Tesla, that fit your description. Other data indicated that Ford may be right at the 80% level. For Ford, all of their trucks are final assembly in the US, but much of the components are from overseas. So they'll be affected by this. And Tesla will still be affected even though 100% of their final assembly is in the US. Virtually every vehicle has components and assembly overseas.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in response to the announcement, wrote: "To be clear, this will affect the price of parts in Tesla cars that come from other countries. The cost impact is not trivial."

quote:

Notice how they avoid things like BCreed posted about Reagans tariffs on autos. They don't like to talk about it because they can not wrap their minds around it working.

Prices are going up. We just had record inflation with Biden and Trump is about to add to that.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
15751 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Then that isn’t the price hike he was referencing, clearly. Did you read the quote?


You seem to have the same understanding of manufacturing as Trump, which isn’t much of anything.

This isn’t real estate.

Almost all US good are about to be more expensive. Companies just can’t eat tariff increases on supplies they have to use.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283351 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:26 pm to
quote:


The Japanese gov heavily substized their industry.


And we dont?

Why are you pushing to protect these woke arse corporations that takes advantage of you every step of the way?
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
9049 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

There's no reason to increase prices on US cars other than US automakers being greedy


Sure there is. Their operating expenses just gone higher for no reason other than the government making it so. So it sounds to me that you feel like arguing that private enterprise shouldn’t adjust their pricing to keep their existing margins. The market is adjusting higher with moves like this. Not adjusting with it will make you less profitable and that can lead to other problems. It’s foolish beyond belief but don’t blame the corporation for making changes to keep themselves profitable. Your anger should be directed at government for changing the landscape.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
12261 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:28 pm to
Material costs haven't risen much but labor costs have over the last 5 years. The retired boomers have left a huge void in the blue collar workforce.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
39960 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

CCP


quote:

Not conservative.


Is that why you love them so much?
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
8222 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

He's forcing Americans to buy foreign cars with tariffs?


Auto makers are forcing Americans to buy cars with higher prices?

quote:

Do you also understand that all that needs to happen for the tariffs to go away is foreign countries getting rid of tariffs on our products?


Incorrect. Less than that is necessary. All that needs to happen is for Trump to drop them.

quote:

Huh? How are these the same to you?


Because both are a choice.

quote:

one is complete unnecessary greed. There's no reason to increase prices on US cars other than US automakers being greedy and at that point they wouldn't have a built-in advantage of having the best priced vehicles on the market.


Again, I objected to that bullshite coming from the Biden administration. Did you, or were you in agreement then?

Here's a whole article about that same nonsense when Biden was the one spouting exactly the same thing: Companies Stop Gouging Consumers

Corporations have exactly zero obligation to only charge what you or Biden or Trump or anyone else thinks you "should" charge for their products. They made it, they get to decide what they are willing to take for it.

And since Trump's tariffs are going to increase their expenses (there is only one car company that makes all of the car in America—Tesla...hmmm—every other company is going to pay higher prices for parts), of course they are going to charge more. And since the "going rate" for cars is going to go up even more than the cost of their expenses, of course they are going to follow the "going rate" upward. To do anything but that would be to violate their fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders. It would literally be technically illegal to leave money on the table just because Sh Nuff thinks they should.

Since you're asking all of these questions, I'll ask you one.

You realize that the government setting the prices on goods is literally the definition of fascism, right? Trump isn't doing that (yet), but he's attempting to influence them.

Again, he's becoming exactly what his critics have accused him of being all along with stuff like this.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram