- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:02 am to Dale51
quote:The left thinks the right hates NASA because it's a government program.
What are you basing that claim on? Just curious.
The right is inherently nationalist, and beating other countries in high tech shite makes people proud of their country so the right actually loves NASA. Unfortunately the left has used NASA as a glorified weatherman to study polar ice caps and shite in the name of a politically charged issue like global warming. That is just never going to get a lot of funding in congress, especially not from a Republican Congress. Even a democratic controlled congress would only fund climate research enough to be able to say they care. Nobody gets excited about that shite though, not even the left. It's fricking boring.
Trump has a real chance to build the space program to it's former glory here. Building the space program would bring a lot of high paying jobs to a swing state in Florida. Unfortunately I predict the NASA leadership will push back on human exploration. They are personally invested in climate change research and truly believe that should be one of NASA's primary missions. Trump's plan is to transfer earth science to NOAA. NASA will hate this because they look down on NOAA and of course there are a lot of NASA employees who only do earth science.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:04 am to jeff5891
quote:
jeff5891
quote:
People here were incredibly happy that the NASA budget was cut
Only you and the other willfully ignorant out there.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:06 am to auggie
quote:
Yea. bullshite
People here were incredibly happy that the NASA budget was cut
Want to show some examples?
Me. frick NASA. If it needs to be explored, Microsoft will do it. NASA isn't some untouchable government organization. They need to go.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:09 am to jeff5891
quote:Huh?
People here were incredibly happy that the NASA budget was cut
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:13 am to MrCarton
quote:
Me. frick NASA. If it needs to be explored, Microsoft will do it. NASA isn't some untouchable government organization. They need to go.
I like NASA. The space program has spurred a lot of new technologies. In principle I'd agree with you that government does nothing but get in the way but in this case I think reality doesn't align with our principles.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:29 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
The left thinks the right hates NASA because it's a government program.
NASA is one of the few programs that is a return on investment.
Generally speaking, private industries will not invest in innovation if a ROI is not achieved within 5-7 years. NASA however, will invest in innovation out 20 or 30 years. This creates new technologies that revolutionizes industry.
The amount of money generated by the moon missions is unreal compared to the cost.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:34 am to reverendotis
quote:That doesn't appear to be changing. In fact, Trump's only goal for NASA is for 83 years from today.
Consider that for a moment, the United States currently does not have an autonomous functioning program of manned spaceflight at all.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:38 am to mmcgrath
The only thing mentioned so far is to get NASA out of the low earth orbit and earth science business.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:46 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:Oil exploration has benefited greatly from NASA's work in that area. I wouldn't knock its' contribution to the economy either.
The only thing mentioned so far is to get NASA out of the low earth orbit and earth science business.
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 8:47 am
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:48 am to bmy
Trump looking for the transformers
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:48 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:
Generally speaking, private industries will not invest in innovation if a ROI is not achieved within 5-7 years. NASA however, will invest in innovation out 20 or 30 years. This creates new technologies that revolutionizes industry.
We aren't speaking generally. We are speaking specifically.
Who would pay money to explore space when NASA is doing it for them at taxpayers expense?
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 8:50 am
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:59 am to MrCarton
quote:No one, that's the point. I'm okay with funding nasa to explore amd create new technologies. This will open up space to private ventures even more. Before farmers and traders came to North America European governments funded exploration missions. Before we built railroads and had cattle drives and mined gold in the west the US government sent Lewis and Clark to explore it. Private industry will take larger risks than the government will in the name of profit IF there is a real prospect of profit.
Who would pay money to explore space when NASA is doing it for them at taxpayers expense?
The space industry is booming right now. New Theoretical electromagnetic drives have been developed by private citizens. One is even going up in space for a test flight next year. Asteroid mining amd space tourism companies have already been formed.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:04 am to jeff5891
You're full of shite?
Never heard someone say, I'm against boldly going where no man has gone before.
P. S. Hillary lost.
Never heard someone say, I'm against boldly going where no man has gone before.
P. S. Hillary lost.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:56 am to bmy
I thought the free market was best... why are we subsidizing this exactly?
Posted on 11/14/16 at 10:20 am to jeff5891
quote:NASA and space exploration should be in the top 3-5 funded government entities.
Lol people on this board should hate this.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 10:22 am to bmy
Nasa has developed tremendous technology, while preparing for space exploration.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 10:28 am to bmy
This is a lie. I was told repeatedly he was anti science. and would defund NASA to fix potholes.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 10:32 am to bmy
Anything that improves our capabilities for space exploration is a good thing.
Posted on 11/14/16 at 10:36 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Let's see, if it's a 6 month to 1 year trip each way to Mars, wouldn't that make it almost a 3-year journey to any of Jupiter's moons THROUGH the asteroid belt?
Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy! Without precise calculations we could fly right through a star or bounce too close to a supernova and that'd end your trip real quick, wouldn't it?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News