- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TRUMP: US Will Impose 100% Tariff on China Starting November 1st
Posted on 10/11/25 at 6:35 am to John Barron
Posted on 10/11/25 at 6:35 am to John Barron
Now remove every Chinese student from every university.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 6:48 am to mwade91383
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. what is going on with bitcoin. i looked last night and it was down nearly $9000. gold seems to be more of a safety play than bitcoin.Posted on 10/11/25 at 7:03 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Gee, why would China want to jerk us around with respect to rare earth metals?
I own shares of both MP Materials and Uranium Energy Corp that have been stagnant for years, but since April they have been 2 of my biggest gainers.
Looks like another opportunity to buy the dip after all the sellers are washed out.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 7:05 am to texas tortilla
Exit liquidity for the powerful.
There’s always been bad actors but this level of corruption is insane.
There’s always been bad actors but this level of corruption is insane.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 7:14 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:
I own shares of both MP Materials
It will be interesting to see if their Mountain Pass mine stays solvent. My company worked on Project Phoenix when it was Molycorp, and while we got paid, there were horror stories of other contractors getting stiffed when they went bankrupt.
Yes it would be nice to have rare earths mines and refined here in the states, but it’s not like there haven’t been billions invested in this mine before.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 7:55 am to mwade91383
quote:Nor do you have to be eaten alive with TDS, you just choose to be.
Again, you don’t have to be this stupid about everything. You just choose to be.
E.g., NASDAQ futures start *aggressively* selling off at 7:52 PM (green circle) for no reason whatsoever. EXCEPT that's not quite true, is it?
Trump announced tariffs on Canada, Europe, and the rest of the world at 8:06 PM (blue circle).
Right.
EXCEPT The White House trade team earlier completed letters during ongoing meetings. Anonymous tips to wires (e.g., Reuters) hinted at Canada/EU escalations, but there was no formal alert. Rumors built. The markets showed mild after-hours volatility.
Then .... wait4it ... at 7:52 PM a call went out to the press per leaked WH prep notes that there would be a formal announcement. Based on the building rumors of Canada/EU escalations, market action was immediately responsive.
Now you can presuppose Trump et al are making bank with this stuff. You can wig out with TDS and claim there's no other possible explanation. You can ignore the fact this stuff has always occurred. Markets move by the time news breaks ... "Buy the rumor. Sell the news." You can make those claims, or hold those TDS beliefs as you wish. But calling others "stupid" d/t your personal TDS is a really bad look.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 8:42 am to mwade91383
quote:
Dafuq? Were posting anonymously on a website called tiger poop.com. Nobody here actually thinks their opinion matters But to the point, corruption is bad, actually. It’s not that complicated.
No shite. Still nothing can be done by whining about it.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 8:43 am to NC_Tigah
Given everything else we’re seeing that’s a super naive hypothetical, but also absolutely on brand for you.
Show me those blatant examples of this “always occurring” tied directly to news from the whitehouse/dem administration. We’re going to need to see your receipts on that.
Also, are you just ignoring the several other exampels? More coincidences?
Show me those blatant examples of this “always occurring” tied directly to news from the whitehouse/dem administration. We’re going to need to see your receipts on that.
Also, are you just ignoring the several other exampels? More coincidences?
Posted on 10/11/25 at 8:44 am to DemonKA3268
Do you have a point or are you just yelling at the clouds?
This is a message board. Do you know what a message board is?
This is a message board. Do you know what a message board is?
Posted on 10/11/25 at 8:50 am to John Barron
When if ever is all this bullshite going start being advantageous to the regular working man…
Posted on 10/11/25 at 8:50 am to NC_Tigah
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I’m sorry man but at some point, if you can’t see what’s happening, you have nobody to blame but yourself.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 9:15 am to AirbusDawg
quote:
I'll give anyone that wants it 1000/1 odds that come November 1, there will not be a 100% tariff on China. This guy just keeps fricking us with this shite. Why not just say starting right now, 100% tariff? It's embarrassing to listen to this bullshite. He's been a total disaster on everything but the border.
We are raking in over 30 billion a month in tariffs with no inflation and trillions of committed investments, what an asinine statement.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 9:22 am to RogerTheShrubber
What major world economies are doing better and looking better than the US post covid?
Are there a bunch of them or few to none cause I really don't know.
Are there a bunch of them or few to none cause I really don't know.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 9:23 am to mwade91383
quote:
that’s a super naive hypothetical
I'm not certain you know what the word "hypothetical" means. I simply laid out the facts and timeframe. There were no hypotheticals, nor openings for naivety.
quote:You cannot be serious
Show me those blatant examples of this “always occurring” tied directly to news from the whitehouse/dem administration. We’re going to need to see your receipts on that.
Perhaps you've heard of Hunter Biden or Nancy Pelosi ... get your own receipts on her.
BTW, I defended some of Paul Pelosi's trades in the same way I'm pointing out the errors in your assumptions here. I did the same with Kelly Loeffler when she was falsely accused by her Republican opponent.
During the Obama Admin, rumors of insider trading were so rampant (especially during the ACA runup) that the Stock Act was passed.
This post was edited on 10/11/25 at 9:24 am
Posted on 10/11/25 at 9:29 am to trinidadtiger
Posted on 10/11/25 at 9:30 am to mwade91383
quote:Let's be crystal clear. I'm not saying that insider trading does not occur or that crackdowns are not in order.
I’m sorry man but at some point, if you can’t see what’s happening, you have nobody to blame but yourself.
My issue is with your assumption they are being coordinated with Trump cronies. I laid out exactly how insider moves could have occurred independent of that in the South African and July 10 instances.
This post was edited on 10/11/25 at 9:33 am
Posted on 10/11/25 at 9:45 am to NC_Tigah
The fact that you think what Hunter and Pelosi did (while bad) are comparable (esp in terms of scale or egregiousness) shows how deeply unserious you are.
Rumors? Again, provide receipts for your beliefs. This is not a high bar.
Rumors? Again, provide receipts for your beliefs. This is not a high bar.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 9:50 am to NC_Tigah
Well I’m glad we agree on that part. The credibility of our markets is rapidly deteriorating which can lead to really bad longterm consequences.
That’s still a lot of coincidences (even if you put aside that SA trade) to argue against the painfully obvious. Like how many different blatant examples would it take?
That’s still a lot of coincidences (even if you put aside that SA trade) to argue against the painfully obvious. Like how many different blatant examples would it take?
Popular
Back to top


0





