Started By
Message

re: Trump tweeting whistleblower attorney donated to Biden!

Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by latigerfan2
covington, la
Member since Jan 2005
2176 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:19 pm to
It’s blackmail of a foreign government. And how impotent does Obama look in all of this? Apparently he was letting all of his “subordinates” run wild during his 2 terms.
Posted by Spirit Of Aggieland
Houston
Member since Aug 2011
4607 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:20 pm to
I am realistic, and expect that almost all of these attorneys have contributed to either one party or the other. They are attorneys.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167395 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:22 pm to
Everybody go tweet to the witch dentures clattering POS Speaker AOC

https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1176898993986707456
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

It’s blackmail of a foreign government.
That’s literally what we do with nations all the time, like threatening other nations who deal with Iran and other nations under sanctions.
quote:

And how impotent does Obama look in all of this?
I mean a bunch of nations (and organizations like the IMF) were calling for the prosecutor’s removal, so I’m not sure how getting him removed would look bad if he was as corrupt as they said.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167395 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:26 pm to
Thanks to the Q people and many others for making Crowdstrike trending on twitter.

Now that's what I am talkin bout!

https://freebeacon.com/politics/ukraine-whistleblowers-lead-attorney-donated-to-biden/
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Maybe what actually happened was bribery, but I don't see how you could say that what he STATED (withholding a loan to remove a corrupt prosecutor) is bribery. That's not much different than the DOJ withholding loans from sanctuary cities or putting sanctions on a country and withholding funds from them.



Ummmm...

Biden withheld foreign aid from Ukraine unless and until the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden's criminal activity with Barisma (sp?) was fired.

FYI, using public tax payer funds for personal gain is a big no no.

Surprised you didn't know that.


And holding back funds from sanctuary cities is to shape public policy by democratically elected officials in the public's interest (even if you personally don't like it).

Personal gain versus policy initiatives.

There is MASSIVE difference.
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 2:31 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

That’s literally what we do with nations all the time, like threatening other nations who deal with Iran and other nations under sanctions.


But not for personal gain. At least the personal gain part is hidden for the most part.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89039 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

whistleblower attorney donated to Biden


He also worked for Hillary at one time, so I’m not sure what’s so shocking about this.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

I mean a bunch of nations (and organizations like the IMF) were calling for the prosecutor’s removal, so I’m not sure how getting him removed would look bad if he was as corrupt as they said.


I've already covered this.

It's contrived bullshite.

Literally ALL of this chatter started after this prosecutor got the company Hunter worked for in his sights.

Congrats. You discovered the rest of the west listens to the leaders of the world's largest super power.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89039 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Congrats. You discovered the rest of the west listens to the leaders of the world's largest super power.


That’s what’s so funny about the ‘muh EU’ and ‘muh IMF’ idiots. They like to act as if those angels Obama and Biden wouldn’t or even couldn’t exercise any undue influence over those already sketchy organizations. Absolutely impossible that it would happen.
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 2:52 pm
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Literally ALL of this chatter started after this prosecutor got the company Hunter worked for in his sights.
The whole ordeal (Biden joining board in 05/14; Shokin appointed in 02/15; US publicly accusing Shokin of corruption in 09/15; Shockin’s removal of 03/16) relatively quickly. If he was corrupt, then it would have had to occur in that time anyways.

And regardless, this doesn’t explain why a whole bunch of other countries were calling for his removal. Biden may not even been important enough to do something that corrupt and lie about the Shokin’s corruption to even Obama (on his way out), let alone other nations.
quote:

Congrats. You discovered the rest of the west listens to the leaders of the world's largest super power.
So it was a corrupt global effort to take out this prosecutor to protect the son of a relatively obscure Vice President in a lame-duck administration, and it couldn’t have just been that the prosecutor was corrupt?

And they took on all that risk for that one prosecutor, but they kept him in office for months and kept alive to tell about it?

But I guess we’ll give the guy who spent years working for the Communist Government of the Soviet Union the benefit of the doubt.
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 3:14 pm
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157786 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 7:25 pm to
Nice dodge
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

And look at all the money Trump gave the D's, and not only that, he even had the Clinton's at his wedding, endorsed Hillary's presidential abilities, and was golfing buddies with Bill. Maybe that's why they're still free and clear legally, because their buddy is in power (I don't believe that).

So could you so unconditionally support someone who went way beyond just donating money to a crooked D candidate? Or maybe it's just not that big of a deal if someone supports a particular candidate at one time or another when most of their life is independent of that.



You're a dumb arse

clap clap clapclapclap
Posted by QboveTopSecret
America
Member since Feb 2018
3495 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 8:10 pm to


Biden could be the first Medal of Freedom awardee to lose his Freedom.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 9/25/19 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

but I don't see how you could say that what he STATED (withholding a loan to remove a corrupt prosecutor) is bribery.



bribe definition "money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust"

if you remove X prosecutor, you will receive the withheld money. If you do not remove X, then you will not get money. This is the scenario that occurred.
Money was threatened to be withheld based on conduct, and was disbursed based on said conduct being performed, from the mouth of Biden himself.

quote:

That's not much different than the DOJ withholding loans from sanctuary cities or putting sanctions on a country and withholding funds from them.



sometimes bribes are legal, like what you listed federal vs state. However using your office to bribe foreign officials for the benefit of yourself/family benefit is not one of those instances. Bribery occurred, to deny this is serious mental gymnastics.

There may be an argument as to whether Biden's bribery was for personal gains or whether it was legitimate policy. But there is no argument that bribery occurred.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram