- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Tweeting 7/16/17: Media officially on suicide watch
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:35 am to Bunyan
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:35 am to Bunyan
Never trust a man that continually deflects.
It's no wonder why his son is a pompous jack that can't take responsbility for his own actions.
He never learned how to. His best influencer never did
It's no wonder why his son is a pompous jack that can't take responsbility for his own actions.
He never learned how to. His best influencer never did
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:37 am to Bunyan
Trump melting down on twitter because Jr admitted to taking meetings with Russian agents.

Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:38 am to Gaspergou202
quote:
Your Arkansas election results DO NOT disprove my contention that voting 3rd party candidates is just sophomoric political masturbation.
I had 4 choices on election day:
1) Trump - Vote wouldn't matter because I knew Trump would easily win Arkansas anyway.
2) Hillary - Shitty candidate with a ton of baggage, controversy, and zero charisma
3) Stay home - Same as 1
4) 3rd party - Meaningless except for the tiny voice of displeasure in the status quo
I voted 3rd party (where available) in the local election too and I'll vote straight line 3rd party from here on out. I'd rather vote for a probable shithead than a proven one.
And if you don't want a 3rd party candidate stealing your votes then maybe field a better candidate
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:43 am to Salmon
quote:
There were more than just Trump and Hillary.
Correct.
There was Trump.
There was Hillary.
And there was [insert name here] wasted protest votes!
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:45 am to Bunyan
media's amused by 45
they're not intimidated by him
they're not intimidated by him
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:50 am to AUbused
Yea they seem like accurate sources. Why was Fusion GPS person there? Why was lawyer granted entry on expired visa? What were the "extraordinary" circumstances that the doj insisted were important? Can you answer any of these?
Posted on 7/16/17 at 10:51 am to LSU1NSEC
Evidence? They sure want to get him put of office fairly quickly. They're scared he'll shut them down or expose them because he has all the information they don't want him having
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:24 am to dbeck
quote:
And if you don't want a 3rd party candidate stealing your votes then maybe field a better candidate
Wow! Somebody is a resident of Oversimplification Arkansas!
A vote FOR a candidate or cause is NOT a stolen vote.
But you didn't vote FOR anything or anyone.
quote:
4) 3rd party - Meaningless except for the tiny voice of displeasure in the status quo
I voted 3rd party (where available) in the local election too and I'll vote straight line 3rd party from here on out. I'd rather vote for a probable shithead than a proven one. And if you don't want a 3rd party candidate stealing your votes then maybe field a better candidate
Voting against anything (ex: "status quo") or anyone (ex: Hillary) is also not stealing votes. It's wasting votes in a little unnoticeable temper tantrum!
Explain the difference between a third party voter saying my vote only matters as a meaningless tiny voice of displeasure, or a non voter saying my vote is a meaningless tiny voice so I show my displeasure by not using it?!
Since no EC vote has ever been won or lost by one popular vote, I don't care if you squander your vote as a non vote or an no influence 3rd party. But one day???!
And pray tell oh mighty nay voter, how do you know the results before the votes. Hillary was in the bag, and Dewey beat Truman! Be careful what you wish for! Every time a third party won significant votes, the least desirable main candidate won.
Also don't be surprised if neither contending candidates don't work for or give a shite about you or your protesting vote. This too is "status quo"!
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:27 am to LSU1NSEC
quote:
media's amused by 45 they're not intimidated by him
They will be!
They will be!
CNN should have been already! But fools rush in.
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:33 am to Gaspergou202
quote:
how do you know the results before the votes. Hillary was in the bag
Call it a hunch.
Donald Trump 677,904
Hillary Clinton 378,776
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:37 am to Bunyan
quote:
With all of its phony unnamed sources
I am still not convinced that a high percentage of these 'unnamed sources' actually exist. Reporters are just making shite up and claiming it's from unnamed sources.
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:45 am to Zach
quote:
I am still not convinced that a high percentage of these 'unnamed sources' actually exist. Reporters are just making shite up and claiming it's from unnamed sources.
You're probably right Zach, but its also possible to find any number of unnamed sources to say anything, about anyone, and whenever needed if they can be assured that they will stay unnamed, unknown, and irresponsible.
Edit: That's how gossip works, and witch trials start!
This post was edited on 7/16/17 at 11:47 am
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:54 am to Bourre
quote:
This is going to be my background image for Facebook.
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:55 am to StrongSafety
quote:
Never trust a man that continually deflects.
DNC/MSM Political Complex: "Muh-Russia, muh-Russia, muhRussia, ..."!
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:56 am to Salmon
quote:
High ground is an expression to describe the act of looking down upon others for something. Like mocking someone for voting for a certain candidate. This is basic stuff that I wrongly assumed you understood. I won't make that mistake again. My apologies.
You're confused. You stated that Trump voters had no "high ground". So your position is that they don't possess the quality you stated in your post...they don't look down on others for something?
Basic stuff.
Posted on 7/16/17 at 11:59 am to LSU1NSEC
quote:
media's amused by 45 they're not intimidated by him
Thats funny, right there, i don't care who you are.
Posted on 7/16/17 at 12:01 pm to AUbused
That only exists in your mind.
Posted on 7/16/17 at 12:04 pm to AUbused
quote:
Trump melting down on twitter because Jr admitted to taking meetings with Russian agents.
Sooooo
Your claiming that Obama gave special clearance for "Russian agents" to enter America to influence our elections???!!!
OMG! Putin-Obama Collusion!
Posted on 7/16/17 at 12:11 pm to Gaspergou202
The “but…but…but…HILLARY!” and “but…but…but…OBAMA!” from Trump, from Fox News, from Trump staffers, and from the right in general is getting old.
And we’re not falling for it anymore?—?at least thinking people aren’t (the Trump cultists will eagerly clutch any straw they can find).
Southern Trump cuck idiots will never see it any other way, but don't have a big voting base and, in general, don't matter.
And we’re not falling for it anymore?—?at least thinking people aren’t (the Trump cultists will eagerly clutch any straw they can find).
Southern Trump cuck idiots will never see it any other way, but don't have a big voting base and, in general, don't matter.
Popular
Back to top


2




