re: Trump survives second assassination attempt - RDS initiates separate FLA investigation

Hannity back on Fox saying he was almost there on the golf course but he was busy. When he was a carpenter/painter/worker he fell off a roof, he knows roof slopes.

Hannity has Trump on tonight. Hannity told the Fox News Decision Desk in 2020 Trump was going to a victory podium and then they shut down the rustbelt.

So why is Hannity trusted beyond his sensei moves? Trump could do an exclusive anywhere. WHY Hannity?

The media and left are blaming Trump and Vance pointing out Haitians. FBI agent lady saying Trump should be told to curb where he golfs. USSS thinks they saved face with this...

quote:

---

This isn’t true. You don’t have to lie. If you’re not lying, then start reading books and get smarter.

---

You might get a whole lot smarter just by reading the definition of the word populism and comparing it to the central tenets of Marxism.


pop·u·lism
/'päpy??liz(?)m/
noun
a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.

Marxism-Marx made class struggle the central fact of social evolution. “The history of all hitherto existing human society is the history of class struggles.”

In Marx’s view, the dialectical nature of history is expressed in class struggle. With the development of capitalism, the class struggle takes an acute form. Two basic classes, around which other less important classes are grouped, oppose each other in the capitalist system: the owners of the means of production, or bourgeoisie, and the workers, or proletariat.

If you want to quibble about semantics (you apparently do), then fine. Marxism is about a lot more than just populism. It has more nuance and in it's original form, at least, is more exclusively economically focused, although Marixsm didn't stop being developed as an idea after Marx died and has expanded into forms well beyond it's original form.

But practically speaking, you tell me.

What's the difference between a Marxist who tells me that the problem with society is that the bourgeoisie control all aspects of society and an American populist who tells me that the problem with society is that the Deep State controls all aspects of society? Or the Elite, or Global Elite, or Uniparty, or whatever silly term is most en vogue at the moment?

What's the difference in a Marxist who favors government actions that trend toward collectivism in the name of helping the proletariat and an American populist who favors the same policies because they help "ordinary citizens," or "The Little Guy?"

Do you really not see that the only difference is in the semantics used?

Do you really not see that neither viewpoint values individual freedom and responsibility and instead values collectivism?

Do you really not see that the justification in both scenarios is the narrative of the class struggle between the "Elites" and "Common People?"

There are many low IQ posters on this board—so many it scares me because I know that for every one that posts here there are 10,000 out in the world not posting.

I genuinely never thought you'd be posting like one of them.

quote:

---

Case in point.

---

Exactly. You conservatives failed so miserably it took a Dem to save the shite party you love so much

quote:

---

Hannity in 2020 over so much, but most especially telling us lies that all would be arrested any moment.

---

Yes, I agree. I will not watch any mainstream news anymore, they lie on both sides. I prefer the reporting on X. They present the information in short, microblog style which is really good.

quote:

---

Which is 99% of them and you all keep voting them in
By definition that is a failure

Conservatives failed

---

leave him be. he is fighting ghosts. i bety he loved W, mccain and mittens tho. total moderate RINOS. a guy can be conservative on the vast majority of issues like reagan or trump but if they frick up on 1 or 2 issues they scream MUH (fill in blank) is not a conservative hurr durr.

shits hilarious. still wondering who's alter he is. we will find out in due time.

quote:

---

Conservatism never failed.

---

I mean, depending on how you define it, it always fails.

If you see it as "conservation" of existing norms, it's definitely failed. However I would argue also that conservatism as an antonym to "liberal action" is also failing. There is absolutely a time and place where fire must be fought with fire. It's this weird purism that emerged over the last 30 years that's killing the GOP.

quote:

---

Liberal Hank or anotber Cuckeye alter

---

yeah those 2 have been MIA for quite some time.

quote:

---

yeah those 2 have been MIA for quite some time.

---

Shhhh....don't call them back.