- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/23/23 at 4:17 pm to davyjones
The rinos love that line of thought.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 4:21 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Trump supporters, will you vote for DeSantis in the general if he wins the nom?
Yes. I am never voting for a Democrat.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 4:25 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Trump supporters, will you vote for DeSantis in the general if he wins the nom?
No they wont. How do you think those two Communists from Georgia got elected to the Senate ? No Trump or Trump supported Candidate, no vote.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 4:30 pm to Tusksup
Here’s another way to look at it: If you were in Adam Schiff’s Congressional District, and there was a RINO running against him who actually had a realistic chance to win and snatch that seat, and at the same time the Republicans were on pace to also snatch the majority from the Democrats in the House who currently held the majority….. and every potential Republican win was indispensable and crucial for that Republican upset over the Democrats to occur -
Do you not want to do whatever it takes to get that crucial victory over Schiff, thus flipping that seat and notching one seat closer to the Republican overthrow of the Democrat majority? **Even if it means holding your nose and casting your vote for that RINO challenger? Or do you take the position that you’d rather Schiff keep the seat, and Democrats retain their majority??
Do you not want to do whatever it takes to get that crucial victory over Schiff, thus flipping that seat and notching one seat closer to the Republican overthrow of the Democrat majority? **Even if it means holding your nose and casting your vote for that RINO challenger? Or do you take the position that you’d rather Schiff keep the seat, and Democrats retain their majority??
Posted on 2/23/23 at 4:37 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Top 12 of what?
CPRI.
Are you coming back to the charity victory trough with me again? You know I’m plenty confident enough to know where things stand in the food chain, so I’ll allow another one. But don’t make it so obvious next time. And put some time in between each so it doesn’t come across quite so pathetic.
I kid, Franklin D. Broosevelt. I guess I could’ve held off on that one.
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 4:46 pm to davyjones
You're making the assumption that the rino would vote differently than schiff.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 4:54 pm to Tusksup
Your point is valid, but there’s much more to it than just an individual member’s vote. The bigger picture is the vast array of power that comes with the majority as a whole. Determination of rules, committee assignments and chairmanships, subpoena power, power over what bills come to the floor, over what happens on the floor generally, etc etc.
I’m admittedly no Congressional procedure expert, but we probably all are aware of the many other implications of holding the majority, when we stop to consider it. IMO attaining majority is much, much larger than any handful of its component members, even problem child ones. They will have to be dealt with in any possible manner of ways as time goes by, on an individual and tailored basis. Some may require whippings out back. Ok I take that part back.
I’m admittedly no Congressional procedure expert, but we probably all are aware of the many other implications of holding the majority, when we stop to consider it. IMO attaining majority is much, much larger than any handful of its component members, even problem child ones. They will have to be dealt with in any possible manner of ways as time goes by, on an individual and tailored basis. Some may require whippings out back. Ok I take that part back.
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:03 pm to davyjones
quote:
davyjones
I think I aimed too high on that one.
My bad.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:13 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Can I call a timeout and you tell me once and for all what CPRI means to you? Then we can proceed.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:15 pm to davyjones
quote:
Can I call a timeout and you tell me once and for all what CPRI means to you? Then we can proceed.
Not everything is me trying to trick someone into making themselves look like an idiot.
CPRI is Cuck Power Ranking Index. It's Fat Bastard's list of people who live in his head.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:17 pm to davyjones
quote:
Can I call a timeout and you tell me once and for all what CPRI means to you? Then we can proceed.
I would disengage….you’ll be in a full circular argument before you know it.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:19 pm to davyjones
I understand what you're saying, but still, that is what got us where we are. We have to start saying no and voting no when they don't do what we tell them.
That means we will probably have to let the dems crash the system before we can start to fix it, preferably without dem/rino input.
That means we will probably have to let the dems crash the system before we can start to fix it, preferably without dem/rino input.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:22 pm to Tusksup
quote:
We have to start saying no and voting no when they don't do what we tell them.
This^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I would have thought after the way Paul Ryan treated Trump that would be a no brainer.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:25 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I don’t think it was you trying to perform any trickery at all. I figure it was more necessary for you to need me to know what it stood for, otherwise it meant nothing to who you were directing to.
Anyway, cutting to the chase here, I couldn’t possibly be in a group of a top 12 with the initial assertion to which you replied with the acronym, because in case you didn’t notice I kinda stand alone with that viewpoint. That’s makes me top 1. But top 1 wisest. Although some may say wise asses. Let’s see if you can be jovial back.
Anyway, cutting to the chase here, I couldn’t possibly be in a group of a top 12 with the initial assertion to which you replied with the acronym, because in case you didn’t notice I kinda stand alone with that viewpoint. That’s makes me top 1. But top 1 wisest. Although some may say wise asses. Let’s see if you can be jovial back.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:27 pm to davyjones
quote:
I figure it was more necessary for you to need me to know what it stood for
Nope. You've been around enough for me to assume you'd already seen it before.
quote:
I kinda stand alone with that viewpoint
That isn't what the CPRI is about.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:30 pm to GumboPot
I will be voting in the general for whom every is not the D nominee and has the best chance to win ( seeing as there is never a viable 3rd party candidate, that will be the R nominee.)
Posted on 2/23/23 at 5:50 pm to GumboPot
The other option is a shitbrained Democrat.
Yes.
Yes.
Popular
Back to top


0





