Started By
Message

re: Trump Revokes Everyhing signed by Biden’s Autopen

Posted on 11/28/25 at 5:47 pm to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92948 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

RelentlessAnalysis


Which tarded poster are you the alter of?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1457 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Which tarded poster are you the alter of?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92948 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 6:11 pm to
Probably Hank or SFP with how dumb and far left you are
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
7958 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Electronic signatures are enforceable. Black & white stuff.


only if they are verified

You tell me Biden knew about every single autopen signature and I don't mean that he understood, that he understood they happened.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
32279 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 6:17 pm to
He’d proudly vote for Biden today. Of course that retard thinks Biden knew what was going on
Posted by newmexicotiger
Member since Sep 2017
4039 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Electronic signatures are enforceable


Not when a subordinate is electronically signing it without your knowledge. The guy has Stage 6 dementia. Severe cognitive decline, requiring extensive assistance for all activities.

The guy could not dress himself. I'm not mocking him. It's just the harsh reality of an unforgiving disease.









Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Member since Oct 2025
1457 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

quote:

Electronic signatures are enforceable. Black & white stuff.
only if they are verified

You tell me Biden knew about every single autopen signature....
I was discussing signatures on contracts under the UCC, not Biden and the autopen.

Y'all can discuss that one to your hearts' content. We can speculate about Biden's (limited) competence, especially at the end of his term, but it just isn't all that interesting because nothing substantive will come from this Trumpian proclamation.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465113 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Probably Hank or SFP with how dumb and far left you are

You're competing with Vox for biggest retard in this thread with that comment, and that's saying a lot considering the idiocy he's posted
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465113 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

You tell me Biden knew about every single autopen signature and I don't mean that he understood, that he understood they happened.

Your issue is that the burden is going to be on you to prove this, and without Biden testifying to it, it's going to be VERY difficult...effectively proving a negative (he did not have the cognitive ability)
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
18742 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:00 pm to
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
36991 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

The Bush DOJ settled this 20 years ago.

'The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.'
Looks like an EO to me.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148061 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 7:20 pm to
Sir Winston regrets stumping for Trump
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8833 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

Trump hates the Constitution.


The Biden Autopen administration hates the Constitution.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
8833 posts
Posted on 11/28/25 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

When your response is insults, not facts, it confirms I am right.


Wrong. His response confirms the fact that you are a moron.
Posted by SaintsTiger
1,000,000 Posts
Member since Oct 2014
1921 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 6:12 am to
quote:

Your issue is that the burden is going to be on you to prove this, and without Biden testifying to it, it's going to be VERY difficult...effectively proving a negative (he did not have the cognitive ability)


We already have Congressional testimony by his own staff establishing this.

Try again
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92948 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 6:14 am to
You and your alters are frantically trying to defend the autopen

How shocking.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51809 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 6:19 am to
quote:

He can’t revoke Hunter’s pardon but hopefully all of the autopen pardons get revoked and upheld.

Don’t get your hopes up; they won’t be. The burden of proof is on Trump, not Biden, and it is almost impossible to prove that Biden didn’t verbally approve an auto-pen signature.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465113 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 6:22 am to
There is not any solid testimony to establish he had no idea what was going on, and he's come back and stated he approved it all.

Just look at the stupidity in how they spun it in their Congerssional report

quote:

“Barring evidence of executive actions taken during the Biden presidency showing that President Biden indeed took a particular executive action, the committee deems those actions taken through use of the autopen as void,” the report says.


That, uh, ain't how it works. They're flipping the burden. Why? Because they know they can't come close to meeting their burden.

....and we go literally back to the point I made (that you quoted).

They are conflating the easy story (Biden having cognitive decline, which we all agree on) with the hard allegation (Biden's cognitive decline was so great in the instance of each autopen usage that the validity of the authorization is in question). Lots of bait and switch going on without any real proof of the hard allegation.

Basically, they're arguing "See? He had cognitive decline, generally. Now HE has to prove each act he did was valid."

When in reality, they would have to go through each act and prove the incompetence and lack of later concurrence on every. single. action.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
12544 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 6:27 am to
That gobbledygook is not ‘settled’ law; only the Supremes can adjudicate such questions.

But thank you for letting us know you do not understand how our government actually works…
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
7867 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 6:33 am to
quote:

We already have Congressional testimony by his own staff establishing this.


Isn't there a report saying they could not charge Biden criminally because he was too incompetent to stand trial
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram