- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Reveals ‘We Now Know Everything’ About the 2020 Election
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:29 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:29 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Why would I want to do that?
Lulz
You accused me of addressing you, and yet I didnt
Why would you do that?
Edited to add your debunking statement
quote:
I'd be happy to go through those one at a time, if you're game, starting with 1 or wherever you like. I won't pretend I'm familiar with all of them but we can consider the facts of each and present evidence/counter evidence and see where that leads
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:29 pm to Decatur
awe, you poor thing. did Trump rub some sand in your vagina!
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:38 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Lulz
You accused me of addressing you, and yet I didnt
Why would you do that?
Edited to add your debunking statement
This looks my screen name on top
You continue to be confused. I never claimed I would debunk anything, which makes it even more confusing that you added what I actually said again:
quote:Notice the distinct lack of any debunking language. That wasn't me.
I'd be happy to go through those one at a time, if you're game, starting with 1 or wherever you like. I won't pretend I'm familiar with all of them but we can consider the facts of each and present evidence/counter evidence and see where that leads
Then you asked me to "debunk" the conviction of the woman in AZ which makes no sense in context. Why would I even want or need to "debunk" her conviction?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:43 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:1. It refutes the claim that there's "no election fraud."
When were the goalposts ever small-town registration errors, signature issues, or people voting twice in school board races?
2. It is just one thing in many that has been discovered
But keep working for the gaslighters
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:44 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:Who made that claim?
1. It refutes the claim that there's "no election fraud."
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:45 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:You are trying to deny brute fact. It happened. It can't be denied. You are chief gaslighter and a very gullible person
Nope
quote:
Attorney General William Barr
quote:So he's not claiming it DIDN'T happen. Just that he didn't want to investigate what was uncovered
"If you take 2 million cellphones and figure out where they are physically in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, just by definition, you will find many hundreds of them have passed by and spent time in the vicinity of these boxes,"
BTW, continuing to use sources that have been repeatedly proven as being politically biased and even outright liars isn't going to work on me.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:45 pm to northshorebamaman
You said you wanted to go through each line. I gave you just one. Now you dont
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:47 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:Well, to any reasonable person
So judges reviewing evidence, hearing arguments, and ruling that the claims failed on substance is now what makes it look suspicious?
The judges were NEVER going to allow the election to be decided in their courtroom. That seems pretty obviously clear
quote:They didn't all "fail"
Every failed case
quote:Otherwise known as evidence of election fraud
If that process feels suspicious to you it’s because you’ve built a worldview where being wrong is just more proof you’re right
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:48 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Why not let the evidence have it's day in court? In some cases when it was, the plaintiffs won
Walking into a courtroom and spewing circumstantial nonsense
Why would we not err on the side of caution?
quote:And the evidence was given it's time in court. That should bother every american
It’s about what you can prove
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:49 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:Much of it has been posted itt, genius. You think that snopes retorts actually mean something
If you can find evidence of rampant voter fraud in 2020 please post
quote:
So far what has been provided has been easily debunked
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:51 pm to Canon951
Ok. Now what. Need some perp walks, indictments, convictions, and prison terms.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:51 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Who made that claim?
That idiotic oklafag went on and on for millions of posts about it for years
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:53 pm to Bama Mountain
In case this hasn't already been posted
database
Of note
50+ Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing
GOP plaintiff prevailed on 14 of the 21 cases decided on the merits.
database
Of note
50+ Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing
GOP plaintiff prevailed on 14 of the 21 cases decided on the merits.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:54 pm to RobbBobb
quote:I've offered several times. Here's the list:
You said you wanted to go through each line. I gave you just one. Now you dont
quote:
1) Broken tabulators in (R) heavy precincts
2) Violations of laws during covid voting
3) Illegals given documents to allow them to vote
4) Addresses with multiple votes
5) Empty lots with multiple votes
6) Illegal drop boxes provided by biased groups
7) No supervision of drop boxes
8) Envelopes with holes revealing key votes
9) Tabulators illegally fitted for Internet access
10) Windows covered to thwart election observers
11) (R) watchers told to go home until the next morning, while (D) tabulators returned after a short break and continued counting
12) 100,000 voters removed from rolls, after the election was won with less than 20,000 votes in those states
13) Criminal convictions for trafficking of absentee ballots
14) Convictions for illegal voting
15) Convictions for Inter-State voting (aka duplicate voting)
16) Convicted felons recorded as having voted
17) Convictions for Intrastate voting (aka votes recorded in multiple towns)
18) Convictions for deceased voting by a relative
19) Convictions for non-resident voting
20) Convictions for illegal voting (using company address to register)
21) Felony conviction for registrars voting for people who had moved out of the jurisdiction
22) Elections employee convicted of bribery to add votes to 2020 election
23) Conviction for multiple votes cast across 3 or more US states
We starting at 1 or 23?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:54 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Attorney General William Barr said the data revealed nothing at all.
Do you really think he invested the time & resources to make this claim? The time frame between the election and this was relatively short and should be ignored.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 9:56 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:It would be ridiculous to claim voter fraud doesn't exist.
What rock have you been living under? This board was on fire with claims like that in the wake of 2020
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:21 pm to Napoleon
quote:
Y'all been saying this for years. Let's see the proof.
If it was rigged there should be evidence. Not just feelings.
Anyone who doesn't know the truth is just a guy sitting around with blinders on, there is no excuse. The Dems know they stole it, they FIRETOLD the steal in blogs by saying on Election night it will seem like a Red Wave, but our votes will keep coming in. The problem was Trump got 75 Million Votes, so they had to stop the Election in all 7 states, throw out the observers and count until "they won.
So I will explain how Biden cheated and how Trump and Elon stopped the cheat in 2024. They used facebook and Cities giving them DATA they were not supposed to have to see who were the people who never or rarely ever voted. Then when they mailed out Ballots (COVID 19) they picked up all the ballots and filled them out and stuff the boxes as 2000 mules showed. But even that wasnt enough, but get this, Trump got a higher percentage of the Black vote, Women vote and Latino vote in 2020, so how did Biden "win" the 2020 election?
Why stuff ballots in New York or Ill. ? Waste of time. Since White Males are the least likely to vote they stuffed the ballot boxes with white makes who had not voted in 2 or 3 cycles. Many say they tried to vote for Trump only to be told they had already voted.
So, Trump and Elon and the Big Data polling guy got a list of these "Low Propensity Voters" and they set out to get those type voters to fill in a ballot EARLY and to vote early, 2 or 3 weeks ahead if possible. They did 2 things, that locked in these Low Propensity mostly white male voters AND it stopped the Dems from cheating by stuffing their names in, they looked on lists and were like, they already voted. They are not supposed to have those lists, the Cites (Sodom sites) give them these real time lists so the can cheat.
Anyone who still refuses to admit the Dems stole 2020, Biden git 81 Million Votes BRO Obama only 67 million.
There is far more proof, an Objection by a Congressman or Senator would have gave the "Standing in Court" the Dems knew that, this they had to stop the Objections, they did that via the Fedsurection Riot, Pelosi changed from Regular Order to Emergency Order, thereby counting the Electors in session without giving anyone the chance to Object. Now they will not have Standing in any court, and this NO DISCOVER will be allowed, and true discover would have bused the Dems as cheaters. So, when you say courts did this and that, its just a fib, or lie, no Courts ever gave STANDING, and that means no facts were ever looked at. DUH
By the way, if the Riot Plan by those 300 or so Feds/FBI had not worked, The Pipe Bombs were going to be used to go to Emergency Orders.
Basically, you really do not understand anything. You just buy whatever line the libs feed you.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:28 pm to SirWinston
quote:
SMH. Look at the legal case against Trump in NYC as an example of why it's impossible to "prove" that Detroit, Atlanta, Philly and Milwaukee stole the 2020 election.
Shake your head all you want. I didn't say anything about proof.
I said if you know everything, then show what you say you know. Whether you can prove it or not.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:31 pm to Napoleon
The proof is the 81 million votes. There is no way. Trump had more votes in 20 than 24. And we are a threat to democracy. My honest opinion is the day is coming.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:46 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I think the preponderance of evidence indicates that the democrat controlled states (and cities) used COVID to allow an unprecedented amount of fake ballots in a manner that could never be done again.
Bingo. Crazy the amount of votes cast for Dems was similar the election before Covid and the election after Covid.
Huge outlier for Biden that one election and it’s not even close. You really have to be an idiot to say where’s the proof. It’s right in front your face…
This post was edited on 10/27/25 at 10:46 pm
Popular
Back to top



1



