- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump Obstruction Question
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:35 pm
The media today is going all in on "Trump has committed obstruction".
Are they saying that he committed obstruction of justice in an investigation of a crime that he did not commit?
If that is the case, they are out of their minds. That is also assuming that a sitting president can even obstruct justice in the first place.
Are they saying that he committed obstruction of justice in an investigation of a crime that he did not commit?
If that is the case, they are out of their minds. That is also assuming that a sitting president can even obstruct justice in the first place.
7
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:36 pm to brett408
Now it looks like he should have obstructed this sham....
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:38 pm to brett408
They accused him of a crime. He said 'No, I didn't.'
That is obstruction of justice now.
That is obstruction of justice now.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:41 pm to brett408
quote:They're in their circular semantics routine. It didn't say he didn't obstruct. Therefore, he did obstruct. What a bunch of desperate, juvenile idiots.
The media today is going all in on "Trump has committed obstruction". Are they saying that he committed obstruction of justice in an investigation of a crime that he did not commit? If that is the case, they are out of their minds. That is also assuming that a sitting president can even obstruct justice in the first place.
I just called the State Police and they don't have a record that you did not speed. Therefore, you did speed.
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:46 pm to brett408
Bigger question should be how does he obstruct an espionage investigation which would therefore have no "crime" to obstruct?
If they are using the FISA court to survail US citizens it is supposed to be regarding espionage, which is not something the president can obstruct because those types of investigations are supposed to be at the behest of the president..
If they are using the FISA court to survail US citizens it is supposed to be regarding espionage, which is not something the president can obstruct because those types of investigations are supposed to be at the behest of the president..
Posted on 4/18/19 at 1:49 pm to brett408
quote:
“We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a president’s corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice,”
Posted on 4/18/19 at 2:54 pm to brett408
i loved the guy on CNN who was saying it was clear obstruction of justice when trump went to RR and demanded mueller be replaced forced to step down because he has clear undeniable conflict of interest in investigating trump after trump refused to appoint him as AG.
never mind the fact this was before the investigation even started and it was only about getting a non biased person in charge of the SC
according to the report trump "wanted" to obstruct justice by firing mueller but he was told he couldnt do it or it would actually be obstructing justice
dimms take that to mean he had the clear "intent" to obstruct justice so based on his "intent to break the law" he has committed an impeachable offense for thinking it
never mind the fact this was before the investigation even started and it was only about getting a non biased person in charge of the SC
according to the report trump "wanted" to obstruct justice by firing mueller but he was told he couldnt do it or it would actually be obstructing justice
dimms take that to mean he had the clear "intent" to obstruct justice so based on his "intent to break the law" he has committed an impeachable offense for thinking it
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 4/18/19 at 3:24 pm to brett408
quote:.
That is also assuming that a sitting president can even obstruct justice in the first place.
I think we can all agree that this is a dangerous line of thought
Posted on 4/18/19 at 3:38 pm to bmy
I think we can all agree that you were hoping the lie you bought was true.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 3:41 pm to roadGator
quote:
I think we can all agree that you were hoping the lie you bought was true.
Link it
good luckPosted on 4/18/19 at 3:42 pm to bmy
Link what?
A belief?
Nah.
You can act coy all you like. No one believes you.
A belief?
Nah.
You can act coy all you like. No one believes you.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 3:43 pm to bmy
Hilarious how all you loons are now acting like you never believed the collusion hoax.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 3:45 pm to thebigmuffaletta
That 995 tool has been chirping about obstruction all day as if collusion was never even a thing. They are relentlessly dishonest.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 3:49 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Hilarious how all you loons are now acting like you never believed the collusion hoax.
Link it. Should be easy. Closest thing I've said that I can recall is that DJT Jr. would probably be indicted and that obviously didn't happen.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 3:52 pm to bmy
quote:
DJT Jr. would probably be indicted
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News