- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump may be in more trouble than people think he is
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:18 pm to oldtimefootball
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:18 pm to oldtimefootball
You sir are an idiot and there is zero chance you voted for him twice
0
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:21 pm to oldtimefootball
Statue of limitations hv run out even if was a federal crime but this is a nothing burger.
Now where are we with the Laptop and millions to the big guy and family.
Now where are we with the Laptop and millions to the big guy and family.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:22 pm to oldtimefootball
But what about the statute of limitations?
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:26 pm to oldtimefootball
So you voted for Trump AFTER the Russia hoax, AFTER the exact same Stormy stuff failed the first time, AFTER the bogus Ukraine impeachment, and AFTER everything else… some seven federal investigations, 3ish state investigations, and countless media smear. But THIS is the one? This is different? This isn’t just another partisan persecution? Jesus man. It isn’t even new.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:26 pm to oldtimefootball
quote:
Trump may be in more trouble than people think he is
I've seen this movie many times and the endings are all the same.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:27 pm to oldtimefootball
quote:bullshite
April through December of 2017,
A lil tip for ya. Trump was not ceo nor employed by the Trump organizatiom because his "presidency" wouldnt allow it. Trump had nothing to do with anything at that point.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:29 pm to oldtimefootball
The charges will not stand ... it will be thrown out. With that said, it does not mean there is not anything interesting in it and they know that.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:33 pm to Marcus Aurelius
The female attorney he just hired is a beast and would not have taken the case if she thought she couldn’t win it.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 9:40 pm to oldtimefootball
My understanding is there is no FEC requirement to disclose the details of an NDA. None. He could not have violated campaign finance laws in this case. What tree are you even barking up here?
Posted on 4/5/23 at 10:09 pm to oldtimefootball
You
Got
Him
This
Time
I
Am
Certain
!
Got
Him
This
Time
I
Am
Certain
!
Posted on 4/5/23 at 11:11 pm to SECdragonmaster
There are some dense people on this board. This is not a FEDERAL case. Trump is accused of claiming that $130,000 paid to Cohen was a business expense and thus defrauded the Borough of Manhattan, the City of New York, and the State of New York. The CRIME was tax-related and nothing else. If you dimwits can read and comprehend, look for the Statement Of Facts and read it. I am not advocating for or against Trump.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 11:26 pm to oldtimefootball
quote:
Trump is charged, among other things, with claiming the payments to his personal attorney, Michael Cohen, were business-related attorney retainer fees when the payments were actually reimbursements to Cohen for paying off Stormy Daniels to keep her silent about an alleged affair with Trump.
Trump resigned from all of his businesses when he was elected. The Soros commie bullfrog's made up charge took place after he was no longer in control of the companies alleged infractions. The accusations are BS political persecution.
Storm should be charged with extortion.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 11:28 pm to oldtimefootball
quote:
This is not a FEDERAL case. Trump is accused of claiming that $130,000 paid to Cohen was a business expense and thus defrauded the Borough of Manhattan, the City of New York, and the State of New York.
How can one person be so dense?
quote:
This is not a FEDERAL case.
But it is. What paperwork did Trump have to file in NYC to run for the office of president? The DA is out of his jurisdiction
quote:
was a business expense and thus defrauded the Borough of Manhattan, the City of New York, and the State of New York
Again, Trump was not the CEO of a NYC based company in 2017, when the payments were made. He was the POTUS, and did not conduct any BUSINESS in NYC, which is the only jurisdiction that this DA has by law
Posted on 4/5/23 at 11:30 pm to TigerAttorney
quote:
That special prosecutor is the real problem.
Yep….Bragg is a nothing burger. The Fulton County prosecutor has a nothing burger as well.
But we are already hearing leaks about the special prosecutor and obstruction of justice, which is their go to when they can find the underlying crime.
Posted on 4/5/23 at 11:34 pm to TBoy
quote:
It’s a crime to knowingly misclassified personal expenses as business expenses thereby defrauding the taxing authorities
Trump resigned from all of his companies when he was elected President. He was no longer in control and hadn't been for some time when the whole Cohen/Storm extortion took place but that won't stand in the way of TDS delusions.
Bragg should be arrested for corrupt abuse of power, disbarred and jailed.
Posted on 4/6/23 at 12:34 am to oldtimefootball
Seriously doubt it.
Posted on 4/6/23 at 2:06 am to oldtimefootball
I’m not a lawyer, so I can’t say. But I’ve read a lot of expert opinions on this, and left, right and center, they seem to think this case is a bad joke. I’m going with that.
Posted on 4/6/23 at 4:03 am to oldtimefootball
What specific criminal statutes were violated?
Why are they not listed in the indictment? That creates a 6th Amendment issue.
Why are they not charging him with the underlying crimes?
So these checks that Trump wrote out were in 2017 AFTER the election was over. How is that a campaign finance violation? He was already President. So that just leaves us with the book keeping issue which are misdemeanors that have run past the statute of limitations. There is no felony.
This indictment is a joke. An indictment with no specific crimes listed and stacked counts. Which tells anyone with any sense that the case is weak. Stacking the counts like that to me is like trying to fluff a college paper with word salad so that you can reach the 1000 word minimum.
I don't put it past a NY jury with a judge with serious conflict of interest issues presiding to convict Trump. But it will absolutely get overturned on appeal to the higher court, if not thrown out before it even goes to trial in the first place.
I'm far from a legal expert, but I can read the indictment and the Constitution.
Why are they not listed in the indictment? That creates a 6th Amendment issue.
Why are they not charging him with the underlying crimes?
So these checks that Trump wrote out were in 2017 AFTER the election was over. How is that a campaign finance violation? He was already President. So that just leaves us with the book keeping issue which are misdemeanors that have run past the statute of limitations. There is no felony.
This indictment is a joke. An indictment with no specific crimes listed and stacked counts. Which tells anyone with any sense that the case is weak. Stacking the counts like that to me is like trying to fluff a college paper with word salad so that you can reach the 1000 word minimum.
I don't put it past a NY jury with a judge with serious conflict of interest issues presiding to convict Trump. But it will absolutely get overturned on appeal to the higher court, if not thrown out before it even goes to trial in the first place.
I'm far from a legal expert, but I can read the indictment and the Constitution.
Posted on 4/6/23 at 4:04 am to oldtimefootball
quote:A felony is a very specific charge. If there is no felony there is no case here. None!
The initial payments to Cohen were paid by Trustees of Trump's personal trust, so Trump could say that he did not make the payments himself, therefore he was not guilty. However, for reasons unknown, after the second payment, Trump began making the payments from his own personal bank account with his signature on the check.
Previous local and federal prosecutors struggled to even concoct a misdemeanor out of the thing. Meanwhile, the SOL on any related misdemeanor has long since run its course.
Where is the FELONY?
Posted on 4/6/23 at 4:04 am to Penrod
Just watch the long faces on MSNBC, CNN etc when they talk about how weak the charges are and that should tell anyone not stricken with TDS all they need to know.
If this were a strong case, these people would've been engaged in an elated circle jerk.
If this were a strong case, these people would've been engaged in an elated circle jerk.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News