- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump is reportedly complaining about Elon in private — and hates ‘President Musk’ joke
Posted on 1/8/25 at 11:59 am to Barbenheimer
Posted on 1/8/25 at 11:59 am to Barbenheimer
They continue to attempt to drive that wedge with this narrative 
1
Posted on 1/8/25 at 12:55 pm to Barbenheimer
I am old enough to remember the Russian dossier and the Moscow whore story so go ahead and eat the gruel the NYT is feeding to the sheep.
Posted on 1/8/25 at 12:57 pm to Barbenheimer
quote:
according to a reporter.
This is where I stopped reading...
Posted on 1/12/25 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:AI poster eval is intriguing d/t potential cross-application. After futzing with ChatGPT I got nowhere near the output you've claimed here. Grok is another story though. In fact the detail and accuracy there is impressive. Are you sure you didn't use Grok?
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/12/25 at 11:02 am to Who_Dat_Tiger
quote:
They continue to attempt to drive that wedge with this narrative
They dont need to, the differences in ideology will do that naturally.
Bannon has already gone full progressive. I expect Elon to do the same before long.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 11:08 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Are you sure you didn't use Grok?
e.g.,
quote:
Estimating someone's IQ from online posts involves significant speculation, as IQ tests are formal, standardized assessments that measure specific cognitive abilities under controlled conditions. However, we can infer some insights based on the characteristics of SlowFlowPro's posts on Tigerdroppings.com:
Logical Reasoning and Critical Thinking: His posts demonstrate a clear ability to construct logical arguments and engage in critical analysis, often indicative of higher cognitive functions associated with higher IQs.
Verbal Intelligence: His articulate and precise language use suggests above-average verbal IQ, which is a significant component of IQ tests.
Pattern Recognition and Analysis: Discussions where he identifies trends or underlying issues show pattern recognition skills, another area tested in IQ assessments.
Based on these observations:
ChatGPT Analysis: One thread on Tigerdroppings.com mentions a ChatGPT analysis of SlowFlowPro's posts suggesting intellectual traits consistent with someone in the above-average to highly gifted range, estimating his IQ to be between 120–140. While this is not a formal IQ test, it's based on an AI assessment of his writing style, argumentation, and the complexity of topics he engages with.
User Feedback: Some users on the forum have humorously or seriously speculated about his intelligence, with comments ranging from jest to acknowledgment of his intellectual capabilities. However, these are not scientific assessments.
Given these points:
Speculative Estimate: If we were to very loosely estimate based on the above observations and the informal analysis by ChatGPT, SlowFlowPro's IQ might be speculated to be in the 120-140 range. This range would classify him as having above-average to highly gifted intelligence. However, this is a very rough estimate and should be taken with significant caution:
Limitations:
Online posts do not provide the controlled environment of a formal IQ test.
IQ is multi-dimensional, and not all aspects (like spatial or numerical reasoning) can be inferred from text-based interactions.
The nature of forum discussions can be affected by numerous variables like motivation, time spent, or the desire to engage in debate, which can skew perceptions of intelligence.
Conclusion: While we can infer that SlowFlowPro shows signs of high intelligence through his engagement on Tigerdroppings.com, accurately estimating IQ from such data is highly speculative. An actual IQ assessment would require him to take a standardized test under controlled conditions.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 2:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Donald Trump would “muzzle” Elon Musk if he were not happy with his attacks towards the UK, according to a former aide.
The world’s richest man and the president-elect’s close ally has shaken Westminster as he repeatedly slammed the UK to his 210m followers on X in recent weeks.
LINK
Posted on 1/12/25 at 2:24 pm to NC_Tigah
SFP is a Liberal and useless Attorney!
His IQ, now klein anyone else’s can be determined by some AI ANALYSIS App that supposedly breaks down posts and grammar in an online chat room.
Every single message i’ve sent is on my cell phone & often guve apologies for my grammar or run-ons, because it’s a pain in the arse to post from a cell phone.
But this is TD, so who cares!
and why do you feel compelled to bring up that a-hole SFP, that guy is a POS Liberal Ambulance Chasing scumbag.
His IQ, now klein anyone else’s can be determined by some AI ANALYSIS App that supposedly breaks down posts and grammar in an online chat room.
Every single message i’ve sent is on my cell phone & often guve apologies for my grammar or run-ons, because it’s a pain in the arse to post from a cell phone.
But this is TD, so who cares!
and why do you feel compelled to bring up that a-hole SFP, that guy is a POS Liberal Ambulance Chasing scumbag.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 3:39 pm to Westbank111
quote:Mainly because I like to keep up with AI offerings, capabilities, and limits. I've engaged manipulations forcing AI to produce responses it is superficially programmed to avoid. It's kind of like beating a chess computer. But SFP says he got ChatGPT to spit out info I've not been able to duplicate on that platform. So I'm curious as to how he did that.
and why do you feel compelled to bring up that a-hole SFP, that guy is a POS Liberal Ambulance Chasing scumbag.
Also TTBOMK, SFP doesn't play the med mal game. If he does, I've missed it.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 3:40 pm to Barbenheimer
Sounds like something MSM would say...
Posted on 1/12/25 at 4:11 pm to Rebel
quote:It's written all over her face
A nasty woman.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 4:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If it were anyone else, I'd be much more leery, but Trump has fed info to her for years, so it's well above a 0% chance of being legitimate.
Oh here we go again with your dumb shite…
From the very article you shared
quote:
According to Haberman, the remark by Trump was a “meaningless line, almost certainly intended to flatter.” “The reality is that he treats everyone like they are his psychiatrists — reporters, government aides, and members of Congress, friends and pseudo-friends and rally attendees and White House staff and customers,” Haberman wrote. “All present a chance for him to vent or test reactions or gauge how his statements are playing or discover how he is feeling.”
Posted on 1/12/25 at 4:21 pm to Bunk Moreland
SFP gets WREKT again
Posted on 1/12/25 at 4:27 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I've engaged manipulations forcing AI to produce responses it is superficially programmed to avoid.
Care to share any context? I have also found it requires prodding to get to seemingly more truthful answers.
quote:
But SFP says he got ChatGPT to spit out info I've not been able to duplicate on that platform. So I'm curious as to how he did that.
Perhaps you are not a paid user? Per Chat GPT:
quote:
Ultimately, the key difference is the level of access to advanced features and higher-quality responses, with paid access offering a more robust experience for assessing message board postings.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 5:04 pm to idsrdum
quote:ChatGPT and Gemini both can be worked to the point of apologizing for illogical and/or anti-scientific programming on medical or climate topics.
Care to share any context?
quote:Possibly that's the difference?
Perhaps you are not a paid user? Per Chat GPT:
If so, Grok is a good alternative.
This post was edited on 1/12/25 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 1/12/25 at 5:05 pm to Paddyshack
What a weird and random melt.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 5:08 pm to idsrdum
quote:
Perhaps you are not a paid user? P
I do not pay for ChatGPT
After this exchange, I started on a paid plan with Gemini, but I'm not asking it to do this sort of stuff (the free Gemini was utterly useless, FWIW).
The "Deep Research" on Gemini is a game changer as of today (until the next game changer). I also use GSuite for my business and it fully itegrates
all of that (although we're supposed to get a paid version via GSuite at some point, allegedly).
Posted on 1/12/25 at 5:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:How so?
The "Deep Research" on Gemini is a game changer as of today
Can you share the lines you used to get the ChatGPT output?
Among the free versions, IMO Grok has now jumped out in front.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 5:22 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
I didn’t think journalists did that.
Well, no such thing as a true journalist exists anymore throughout legacy MSM outlets.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 5:31 pm to NC_Tigah
Go find the OT thread on it. I posted a lot more of the stuff as I was doing it. I also would play of other posters who came up with better searches.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News