- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump is considering to to remove Biden’s limitations on Ukraine air strikes in Russia
Posted on 5/27/25 at 9:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/27/25 at 9:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
It was always a pipe dream at best.
0
Posted on 5/27/25 at 9:52 pm to John Barron
Nafo cancer you need it.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 10:01 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Putin called Trump an emotional woman. That will derail it also…
Yeah that’s just playing in Miss Lyndsay’s hands.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 10:09 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
Democrats are not acting in the best interests of the USA. The fact that the establishment Republicans have proven they aren't either is what disappoints me.
When did the Republicans prove that they weren't acting in the best interest of Americans? Would that be when Nixon expanded the Vietnam War? Maybe it was when the Reagan administration was negotiating with terrorists and selling missile to Iran? Perhaps it was when they lied to us to get us into two wars and then passed the Patriot [sic] Act? Could it have been the way the Republican administration handled COVID in 2020?
How could anyone look at EITHER party over the past 50 years and think either one was EVER working in our best interests?
Posted on 5/27/25 at 10:20 pm to RaoulDuke504
Does it cause more bleeding out of these shite countries?
Posted on 5/27/25 at 10:51 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
How could anyone look at EITHER party over the past 50 years and think either one was EVER working in our best interests?
There are at least a few republicans who support cutting unaffordable federal bureaucracy, fighting waste and corruption, reversing Biden's (or whoever ran his administration) destructive open border policy, and oppose involvement in an insane war with Russia. Maybe a few Democrats too, but I missed their voices in recent years.
But, undeniably, many or most of the Republicans in Congress are just as corrupted, and dumb, as their counterparts. At this point, I'll be happy if Trump just manages to burn the GOP establishment to the ground, so citizens who'd like to vote for responsible governance might have better choices next time.
This post was edited on 5/27/25 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 5/27/25 at 11:19 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
I'll be happy if Trump at least burns the GOP establishment to the ground so citizens who'd like to vote for responsible governance might have different choices next time.
The problem is the corporatized structure of the party system. Basically the majority shareholders of two large corporations decide who the people will choose between. It's not working in our best interests.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 11:29 pm to RaoulDuke504
Earlier on, Trump said if Putin didn't negotiate in good faith that he'd give Ukraine all of the arms they ever dreamed of.
Putin can't piss down Trump's collar and tell him it is raining.
Putin can't piss down Trump's collar and tell him it is raining.
Posted on 5/27/25 at 11:37 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:Well, that would be one of the confusing things....
The restrictions are because everyone knows the country Who missiles are launched is the country who actually planned the attack. Because Ukraine without the intelligence of those nations have no use for them.
You can excuse NATO striking Russia in Ukraine but not NATO striking Russia in Russia.
we're openly providing lethal aid. And Ukraine is strking with those arms into Russian claimed, occupied, across recognized border (Russia proper) against the Russian army and infrastructure.
But not to deep. It's like telling a QB he can throw deep, but not enough for a touchdown.
Why is ok to strike Russian territory say 60 km deep but not 90 or more?
It makes no sense.
Secondly, if we're going to restrict the use of lethal aid then just don't give it. It's lethal aid. But we don't want it to be too lethal?
Posted on 5/27/25 at 11:40 pm to Jbird
quote:
Does it cause more bleeding out of these shite countries?
According to Rubio we are the ones bleeding out and no longer have stockpiles to give
Posted on 5/27/25 at 11:45 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
He's been rage tweeting and melting to the press for a few days over Russia. Something is up.
What’s up is he is a narcissistic, draft dodging, fat arse blowhard who is almost 80 and has no clue how to just shut up, stop supplying Ukraine with $ and arms and just hyper focus on domestic issues.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:03 am to WildernessTraveler7
Pretty much sums it up.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:08 am to RaoulDuke504
It's just a minor incursion...
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:16 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
It's amazing how MAGA goes from anti-interventionist to "peace through strength" at the drop of a hat.
It's even more amazing how adult males melt down over a tweet with absolutely zero sources just because they don't like Trump. You want to hear bad news about Trump, so you will believe and react to every story put out there. You're no different than all the democrats in that regard.
You people literally believe every negative unsourced tweet just so you can complain about Trump. Trump has repeatedly voiced peace through strength going back to his first term, so your comment also makes no sense.
Perhaps you just don't remember a few short months ago on the campaign trail when Trump said he would give Ukraine support if Russia didn't come to the table. Like your whining, Trump's position has been consistent.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:20 am to WildernessTraveler7
quote:can you back that up with facts with the definition of a dodger someone who's lottery number (or cutoff) came up AND had a deferment?
What’s up is he is a narcissistic, draft dodging, fat arse blowhard who is almost 80 and has no clue how to just shut up, stop supplying Ukraine with $ and arms and just hyper focus on domestic issues.
What was the cutoff number for the N69 draft (covering birth years 1944-1950)?
What was Trump's SS number for 6/14 and was it below the cutoff number above?
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:23 am to WildernessTraveler7
quote:
What’s up is he is a narcissistic, draft dodging, fat arse blowhard who is almost 80 and has no clue how to just shut up, stop supplying Ukraine with $ and arms and just hyper focus on domestic issues.
Number of Posts: 46
Registered on: 5/4/2025
Posted on 5/28/25 at 5:36 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:
It hilarious how people like you will speak with such confidence
Ukraine striking in Russia doesn’t change the front line
No shite. The reason to try to strike distant Russian cities is to create war weariness and dissent, not to change the front lines directly. Russia has been doing the same thing. So, yes, I’m confidant that what is already happening would happen more if the weapons were provided.
quote:
No one has long range missiles to give Ukraine to even make a difference that will cause Russia war efforts to collapse
Well, who knows? You sure seem, er…confidant.
Let me ask you, confidant sir, if long range bombing of cities doesn’t do anything why is Russia doing it? Putin just not as smart as you? Maybe not as confidant?
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 5:40 am
Posted on 5/28/25 at 7:27 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Number of Posts: 46 Registered on: 5/4/2025
Imagine being a grown man concerned about another man’s post activity…you always stand out as a bootlicker so thanks for further exposing your cultish tendencies.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:20 am to Penrod
quote:exactly. It isn't going to change the front lines... at this point.
The reason to try to strike distant Russian cities is to create war weariness and dissent, not to change the front lines directly. Russia has been doing the same thing. So, yes, I’m confidant that what is already happening would happen more if the weapons were provided.
However, preventing those deeper strikes have prevented the Ukranians from hitting supply nodes and aerodromes that the Russians have put just out of the 'artificial' range. Which is pretty damn close.
It is a WWI style war of attrition, supply and training (thus troop rotation) is everything. The Russians have been able to do both unmolested for years.
It's too little too late now I think. So it is for the "PR" reason you stated at this point. Which, historically, very rarely works. Bombing Hanoi, the blitz, the bombing of Germany... did increase their war weariness, but increased their resolve at least proportionally. Especially in totalarian regimes, which is what Russia (and now Ukraine under war time rules) is.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 8:24 am to WildernessTraveler7
quote:
Number of Posts: 46 Registered on: 5/4/2025
quote:195 & 356
Imagine being a grown man concerned about another man’s post activity…you always stand out as a bootlicker so thanks for further exposing your cultish tendencies.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News