- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TRUMP FULLY ACQUITTED
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:07 pm to PsychTiger
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:07 pm to PsychTiger
I think all of the news people were sent WARNINGS that if they dare to say THE name they are breaking federal law.
Why is everyone still believing it is against the law to say his name?
Why is everyone still believing it is against the law to say his name?
1
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:10 pm to BayBengal9
Republican Senators seem like they are playing prevent defense with today's questions.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:10 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I think all of the news people were sent WARNINGS that if they dare to say THE name they are breaking federal law
The First Amendment would laugh at any attempt at such a charge.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:11 pm to TigerCoon
Well that just got interesting...
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:11 pm to TigerCoon
Question from AZ (Sinema?) Murkowsi, Manchin and Collins.
Bipartisan question now or have there been others?
Bipartisan question now or have there been others?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:12 pm to BuckyCheese
First one I've heard so far, but I missed a chunk of yesterday.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:14 pm to BuckyCheese
muh Logan Act violations?
Was this in the articles?
Was this in the articles?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:15 pm to PhDoogan
quote:
muh Logan Act violations?
Was this in the articles?
No, but this gives Trump's team a chance to undercut "Muh Rudy".
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:15 pm to PhDoogan
I think the following would be perfect content for a slide.
Can we not
Identify
Anyone who
Read reports on
Any person who
May have real
Evidence about
Leaks or
Lies related to the
Anonymous whistleblower?
Can we not
Identify
Anyone who
Read reports on
Any person who
May have real
Evidence about
Leaks or
Lies related to the
Anonymous whistleblower?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:15 pm to PhDoogan
Kennedy putting Nads up against Philbin. 
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:16 pm to BuckyCheese
DIS GUN BE GUD
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:16 pm to PhDoogan
Between Mueller, the pre-trial hearings, and now this farce, I wonder what the final accounting of money and time will be that was wasted. It may end up the most wasteful government expenditure EVER without a single thing to show for it. The F35 may have been extraordinarily over budget, but at least it actually exists.
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:17 pm to Centinel
Muh announcements!
It's so clear, I'm not going to bother to explain why it's clear.
It's so clear, I'm not going to bother to explain why it's clear.
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:17 pm to jdd48
Minor earthquake just felt in DC.
Oh wait, that was just Nadler stepping to the podium.
Oh wait, that was just Nadler stepping to the podium.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:17 pm to Centinel
Get ready for a 5 minute nonresponsive rant
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:18 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
This was slick by Kennedy and Ernst. They knew the order, so Nadler has to go first....then Philbin can destroy his argument.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:21 pm to Centinel
Philbin doing some nice work here
Put him in a psychologists office and determine what % of motive was this vs. that
Put him in a psychologists office and determine what % of motive was this vs. that
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:22 pm to Centinel
And as expected Philbin destroyed him.
And now Roberts says to not direct questions at specific managers. Is that his call to make? If there is no rule against it he has no basis.
And now Roberts says to not direct questions at specific managers. Is that his call to make? If there is no rule against it he has no basis.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:22 pm to Centinel
Roberts stepping in to prevent that embarrassment to the Dems from happening again.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 3:22 pm to PhDoogan
Ya, I figure Roberts would call that. Can't say I disagree, although the Republicans got to pull it off first.
Page 126 of 214
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News