- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump didn’t order an end to the temporary protected status of the 350,000 Haitians
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:53 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The executive order was made by Biden and was just expiring, but a Federal Judge decided it’s not allowed to expire
“This is starting to border on insanity. So Biden administration put in a temporary protection order for 350,000 Haitians. It was done through executive order, so there was no vote, there was no law, there was no legislation.
It was just the Biden administration saying, I wanna give these people temporary protected status, which he's allowed to do.
Now, when Trump came in office, he could have created an executive order and got rid of it, but he said, I'm not even gonna do that. I'm just gonna let it expire. Like, this is not the Trump administration doing anything. They are just letting the policy from Biden expire when it was supposed to.
However, a Washington DC based federal judge, Ana Reyes, who is a Biden appointee, has blocked the Department of Homeland Security from ending temporary protected status, which is, I hate the way that's worded because that's not what they did. No, the Trump administration isn't ending their protected status.
They're simply letting the executive order from the Biden administration expire when it was supposed to.
And now you have a judge who basically says, You don't get to do that. You don't get to let executive orders expire. That is f*cking insane. This isn't a law. This isn't legislation. Nobody voted on this.
This was just the Biden administration saying, I want to temporarily protect these 350,000 Haitians. And Trump saying, okay, I'm gonna let that status expire and they can be deported. And a judge who has no purview in this whatsoever was just like, No, I'm gonna set immigration legislation. I'm gonna set policy….. She doesn't get to do that.”
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:56 am to Ailsa
We have a judge problem. A big one.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:04 am to Ailsa
quote:
Trump didn’t order an end to the temporary protected status of the 350,000 Haitians
Distinction without a difference. Allowing the order to expire has the same result.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:07 am to Ailsa
Judge should be arrested. Pure and simple.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:15 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Distinction without a difference. Allowing the order to expire has the same result.
It does relative to what the judge did.
While I take the position (and I believe the SCOTUS would as well) that the President is completely within his authority to revoke or rescind any such dubious "legal" status conferred by a prior President, this is not an instance where Trump did so before the actual expiration of the established term - where some judges have contended he is bound by APA as well as restrictions on his discretion (again, bullshite of the highest order, but there it is).
This is not that.
This is the 18 month term expiring and the Executive making the decision to NOT extend it, which is 100% its sole discretion. Period. End of mother fricking story.
This judge has essentially supplanted her decision for that of the Executive Branch. A clear violation of the Constitution- ergo, illegal. She is impersonating the President and acting as a usurper. She should be arrested and stripped of her judgeship.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 10:32 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:23 am to udtiger
Should bs an easy reversal then
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:30 am to Ailsa
Deport them anyway. The judge will have no law to charge DHS under.
Popular
Back to top

4







