Started By
Message

re: Trump considering winding down military operations in Iran

Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:19 pm to
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36693 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:19 pm to
Well gole dern bruh, that’s a lot of stuff for a question that really only calls for a yes or no answer. And it’s a true yes or no question, not some lame arse attempt to corner you or jam you up.

Is there any particular reason why you declined to answer either simply yes, or no?
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25207 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:20 pm to
Israel is a big boy now......
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41529 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Well gole dern bruh, that’s a lot of stuff for a question that really only calls for a yes or no answer. And it’s a true yes or no question, not some lame arse attempt to corner you or jam you up.




quote:


Is there any particular reason why you declined to answer either simply yes, or no?


Is there any reason why you haven't answered the last question I asked you?



ETA: also, this is just another deflection attempt on your part. You moved the goal post and you know it.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 9:28 pm
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41529 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Do you believe that the administration issued a final conclusion that Iran’s entire nuclear program had been destroyed as it existed when the bombs dropped, AND that their ability and/or capability and thus their desire to at least attempt to reconstitute the program had been permanently eliminated??


And this qualifies as a straw man.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11280 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:30 pm to
Everything is perfectly clear. Iran could not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, which they have been months away from developing for well over a decade.

Also, Trump is the only president who could have kept us out of war with Iran, as he himself repeatedly told us. So we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, which Tulsi said they didn't have, in 2025. Then we attacked them last month because Israel was going to attack them because they were months away from developing a nuclear weapon since we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and that would lead Iran to attack American bases.

Iran has never posed a threat to the United States, but we had to attack them first, not because of Israel, but because they posed an imminent threat to the United States.

Fortunately, we have won the war, which was not a war but a special operation, in Iran now several times in the last two weeks. It is basically over but might not be over for some time because we already won. We also don't need anyone to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which we knew they would close, which is why we didn't prepare, and we now need allies to help open.

What are you guys not understanding?
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36693 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:32 pm to
Lol no, no it isn’t. Your claim of a strawman is a strawman. What I asked was exactly at the center of the debate.

**And stop upvoting yourself.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 9:36 pm
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41529 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

What I asked was exactly at the center of the debate.




quote:

And stop upvoting yourself.


I just upvoted my last 2 comments to prove it wasn't me.

Beat you again.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41529 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Your claim of a strawman is a strawman.


Also, this is one of the funniest things I've ever read.
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
2796 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:49 pm to
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36693 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:49 pm to
Oh, I didn’t realize you were in the zone looking to eek out a win against me, one of those midweek tune up games, in preparation for league play. Noble effort, I’ll give you that.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36693 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Also, this is one of the funniest things I've ever read.

Dayum. I knew I was good, but I didn’t know I was THAT good.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
17528 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:53 pm to
Well done.

quote:

they posed an imminent threat to the United States.


It’s absolutely comical anyone is buying this.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41529 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:55 pm to
You're welcome, now frick off. You've wasted enough of my time.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11580 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

It’s absolutely comical anyone is buying this.


You're fricking retarded if you don't believe it. You're talking about a country with a history of attacking Americans and American interests literally at every opportunity. Hundreds of times.

The amount of imagineering you idiots have to do to continue to be against anything and everything this President does is astounding and you genuinely do suffer from mental illness. Seek help.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12273 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Everything is perfectly clear. Iran could not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, which they have been months away from developing for well over a decade. Also, Trump is the only president who could have kept us out of war with Iran, as he himself repeatedly told us. So we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, which Tulsi said they didn't have, in 2025. Then we attacked them last month because Israel was going to attack them because they were months away from developing a nuclear weapon since we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and that would lead Iran to attack American bases. Iran has never posed a threat to the United States, but we had to attack them first, not because of Israel, but because they posed an imminent threat to the United States. Fortunately, we have won the war, which was not a war but a special operation, in Iran now several times in the last two weeks. It is basically over but might not be over for some time because we already won. We also don't need anyone to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which we knew they would close, which is why we didn't prepare, and we now need allies to help open. What are you guys not understanding?


Ah-ha. You managed to unravel the web. Now I understand, it’s crystal clear.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36693 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

You're welcome, now frick off. You've wasted enough of my time.

Looks like those wins didn’t happen for you after all. Hey, keep at it though, kid. Eventually you’ll hit pay dirt.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41529 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

Everything is perfectly clear. Iran could not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, which they have been months away from developing for well over a decade.

Also, Trump is the only president who could have kept us out of war with Iran, as he himself repeatedly told us. So we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, which Tulsi said they didn't have, in 2025. Then we attacked them last month because Israel was going to attack them because they were months away from developing a nuclear weapon since we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and that would lead Iran to attack American bases.

Iran has never posed a threat to the United States, but we had to attack them first, not because of Israel, but because they posed an imminent threat to the United States.

Fortunately, we have won the war, which was not a war but a special operation, in Iran now several times in the last two weeks. It is basically over but might not be over for some time because we already won. We also don't need anyone to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which we knew they would close, which is why we didn't prepare, and we now need allies to help open.

What are you guys not understanding?


You sound like you work in the White House.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13418 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

And you could argue it already has.


You'd be fairly dumb to argue that at this point.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13418 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

What are you guys not understanding?


What I'm not understanding is why anyone thinks any of that is any different than the way Trump talks about and reports on everything.

That's his standard script for everything. From tariffs to the border to Iran.

So what I don't understand is why all of a sudden people think this is something different.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 10:42 pm
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
41529 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

You'd be fairly dumb to argue that at this point.


Why?

The 82nd Airborne has been mobilized, but Trump is saying we're just about to drag up and leave Hormuz fricked. The power structure in Iran is still standing, oil has skyrocketed, and infrastructure in multiple Arab states has been blown to hell.

It looks like in a couple of weeks, we'll either have troops on the ground or we'll be pretending like everything is normal. Frankly, neither outcome would surprise me.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram