- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump ally Lindell wins appeal in lawsuit over $5 million 2020 election contest
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:20 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:20 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Huge win for you guys!
Ehh, just more proof you are a retard.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:20 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Egg all over the faces of the law offices of Racist Boosie, SFP and Cwill
I don't think that's egg.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:25 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:
this has nothing to do with the actual 2020 election
this is about a private contest about the 2020 election that Lindell ran that ended with nobody winning. the contestants were civilians and one of them sued for the prize money ( the $5 million)
It was a contest to prove him wrong about the 2020 election.
No one could.
This was about the 2020 election and data from the actual 2020 election.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 4:28 pm to terd ferguson
quote:
So you think he should just stay quiet and hand over $5M?
uhhh, what? lol
I'm saying genuine Crackheads with resources like Lindell don't just "give up" on a fight.
Really not that deep. I'm glad he won
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:06 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Trump ally Lindell wins appeal in lawsuit over $5 million 2020 election contest
Sending another MyPillow to my liberal cousins now.
Hilarity will once again ensue.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:27 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’m not sure I ever commented on the Lindell suit.
You have made comments about "the pillow guy" and the Dominion lawsuit.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:32 pm to TDTOM
Good. We will still get good deals on his pillows. lol
Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:35 pm to boosiebadazz
All the fake lawyers on this board were wrong


Posted on 7/23/25 at 5:53 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Huge win for you guys!
Yep. The leftist losses are stacking up.
Enjoy em..
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:06 pm to tigerfan 64
Stacking e-lawyers like cord wood.
LOL
LOL
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:18 pm to TDTOM
Lol Mikey lies about the data but is gonna escape on some vague contract terminology. Nice
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:23 pm to TDTOM
We really need to work on what people claim as melts on here
.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:34 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Huge win for you guys!
Not really a win for me but obviously it's a crushing loss for you.
For whatever weird reason
Posted on 7/23/25 at 6:36 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Huge win for you guys!
Another big L for you. This, everything else and Sandman
Posted on 7/23/25 at 8:08 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Lol Mikey lies about the data but is gonna escape on some vague contract terminology. Nice
You blatent fricking liar. There was no "vague contract terminology".
Per the article, the appeals judges ruled that arbitration panel CHANGED the terms of the signed contract while in arbitration.
quote:
Circuit Judges James Loken, Lavenski Smith and L. Steven Grasz concluded on Wednesday that the arbitration panel improperly amended the contest's contract terms, putting new obligations on Lindell concerning the data at issue.
“Fair or not, agreed-to contract terms may not be modified by the panel or by this court,” the appeals court said.[b]
Shove this loss up your azz.
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 7/23/25 at 8:10 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
We really need to work on what people claim as melts on here
Kinda tough to do. You melt on most of your posts.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 8:20 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:
You blatent fricking liar. There was no "vague contract terminology".
Per the article, the appeals judges ruled that arbitration panel CHANGED the terms of the signed contract while in arbitration.
Well you've read the article but seemingly don't understand how Mikes credibility is still trash even if he keeps his money(simply requires candidates name in one of 11 files as an example thanks to wording of his contest). It didn't validate that any files were actually from the election, or were the packets he claimed to have showing vote count changes ....
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:13 am to oklahogjr
quote:
oklahogjr
How bad are you crying right now?
Back to top


0








