- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump admin to drop the $1.8 billion weaponization fund
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:12 pm to udtiger
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:12 pm to udtiger
quote:
So he reinstates his $10 billion suit against the IRS
You sky screamers sure showed him! Now the USA is exposed to an additional $8.2 billion in damages.
I bet he doesn’t try to reinstate the suit.
2
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:13 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I bet he doesn’t try to reinstate the suit.
Yea I doubt he does. Especially not with midterms coming
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:14 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
quote:
So he reinstates his $10 billion suit against the IRS
How do you reinstate a settled suit?
Is the 1.8 billion fund being established? You know...the terms of the agreement?
No?
Then there is no agreement (i.e., no settlement)
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:15 pm to stout
Sure. You can donate to them to. Go right ahead.
This defection game yall play on every single topic is so tiring. Fatiguing, even. 2 things can both be shite. Even 3. You're not forced to defend stupid shite because daddy endorsed it.
This defection game yall play on every single topic is so tiring. Fatiguing, even. 2 things can both be shite. Even 3. You're not forced to defend stupid shite because daddy endorsed it.
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:16 pm to udtiger
quote:
Then there is no agreement (i.e., no settlement)
Not how it works if Trump is the one backing out
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:16 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
justice for people who got entrapped
They can still get that, easily enough. File a civil rights action as several of them already have, and/or join the class action suit against the Capitol Police.
Trump can have the DOJ settle those lawsuits for very large sums of money.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:16 pm to udtiger
quote:
Is the 1.8 billion fund being established? You know...the terms of the agreement?
No?
Then there is no agreement (i.e., no settlement)
So you agree he'd have to exhaust appeals before he could argue a breach. Then, who would that argument be against? DOJ for believing they could setup an illegal fund?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:17 pm to LawTalkingGuy
quote:
They can still get that, easily enough. File a civil rights action as several of them already have, and/or join the class action suit against the Capitol Police.
Trump can have the DOJ settle those lawsuits for very large sums of money.
Username checks out
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:21 pm to stout
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:25 pm to stout
He should wait till after the midterms. He is owed that money.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:25 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:
The storm is coming. And they will be outside.
You guys are just embarrassing yourselves now with the hopium. Call him on his bs
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:31 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I bet he doesn’t try to reinstate the suit.
He can't. At his request, it was dismissed with prejudice, so it's over.
Even if he could re-file it, ill bet the second time around the court would dismiss it pretty quickly, both for being time barred and lacking a case or controversy.
However, the Judge did request Trump to respond to the motion from several Judges claiming the lawsuit was a fraud on the court. This is more directed at Trump's attorneys, since the Judge accepted the motion as invoking Rule 11. Rule 11 matters can be addressed by the court without re-opening the case.
That could be part of the reason Trump is giving up on the weaponization fund, but I doubt he would do that just to help his attorneys.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:33 pm to LawTalkingGuy
I saw the DOJ statement saying they’ll abide by the injunctive order. I didn’t see one saying they won’t pursue it at all. I wonder if a reporter saw the DOJ tweet and just got it wrong.
It’s not like Trump to do such an about face on something like this.
It’s not like Trump to do such an about face on something like this.
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:36 pm to udtiger
quote:
Then there is no agreement (i.e., no settlement)
Irrelevant at this point. Trump voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit WITH PREJUDICE, and did not make the settlement part of his dismissal motion. Didn't even mention the settlement.
His case is dead, and if he decides his administration does not have to abide by the terms of his little agreement, thats up to him.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:38 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I wonder if a reporter saw the DOJ tweet and just got it wrong
The first rule of reporting on legal issues is the reporter will inevitably get something wrong
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:40 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Good. Insurrectionists deserve nothing
Which ones were jailed for insurrection?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:41 pm to stout
Good. It was a terrible idea, i'm surprised they ever rolled it out.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:43 pm to udtiger
quote:
You sky screamers sure showed him! Now the USA is exposed to an additional $8.2 billion in damages.
You think the government pays damages?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:43 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
How do you reinstate a settled suit?
It was reinstated by a judge to examine the legality of the settlement. Obviously the administration saw the writing on that wall and dropped the fund.
I'm sure they'll come up with a different settlement package.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 4:06 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It was reinstated by a judge to examine the legality of the settlement.
Not really re-opened. Not yet. The judge is considering the Rule 11 issues raised by the third party motion, and has ordered the Plaintiffs to file a response.
One issue she wants briefed is whether the case should be re-opened due to fraud on the court
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News