- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tommy Robinson arrested again
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:46 am to jimmy the leg
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:46 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
He used a liberal rag that was clearly biased as his source.
Sure, and nobody has disputed the facts reported.
quote:
Then, got his feelings hurt when he was told, “You know, they may be correct, but they may also be putting forth bullshite.”
That is not what was said
1
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's irrelevant.
To you. Then again, it doesn’t support your narrative. Like I said, spectrum.
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is not what was said
Dude, someone posted the motto for them. THEY referenced themselves in that manner.
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:50 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
To you. Then again, it doesn’t support your narrative. Like I said, spectrum.
It's relevant ONLY if you frame it in a partisan way (which you did).
As you said
quote:
Murdering one’s political opposition is a tried and true trait associated with the FAR LEFT.
Assassinations are a non-partisan issue.
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:52 am to Bernie Bierman
Is that the “illegal” film?
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:53 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Dude, someone posted the motto for them. THEY referenced themselves in that manner.
And? who gives a shite.
They reported he screened the movie and was arrested.
As I said:
quote:
I don't think the fact that he screened the movie is in dispute.
They could be fricking Mao or Hitler, and it would not make a difference. Nobody is disputing that he screened the movie.
From the original article:
quote:
Nick Lowles of Hope Not Hate wrote on X: “Tommy Robinson is currently screening the film Silenced in Trafalgar Square, just 48 hours before he appears in the High Court accused of breaking an injunction preventing him from releasing the film.. He’s heading to jail.
“The Attorney General’s office have been made aware of Tommy Robinson screening a film he was banned from showing. Such a flagrant disregard for the law could well see him facing the maximum two-year sentence. Only himself to blame.”
Attacking the source is retarded in this instance.
Posted on 7/28/24 at 11:56 am to USAFTiger42
10+ days with some of the frickery going on
Posted on 7/28/24 at 12:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:a righteous quest to tame the climate is the rantings of a left-wing loon
OK now what is their stance on actual policies
This post was edited on 7/28/24 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 7/28/24 at 1:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The basketball players don’t like Trump so the trumptards are boycotting
You don't know what objective means.
Posted on 7/28/24 at 3:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Assassinations are a non-partisan issue.
Posted on 7/28/24 at 3:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Attacking the source is retarded in this instance.
quote:
You were the one claiming the article posted was beyond reproach. I’m just pointing out that the source should be questioned, especially with that lead in sentence.
I’m sorry that I will pass on blindly believing
quote:
Hope Not Hate on X:
quote:
I don't think the fact that he screened the movie is in dispute.
I have not seen it confirmed yet (well other than claims by lefties).
This post was edited on 7/28/24 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 7/28/24 at 3:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm making no comment on my personal opinions of the propriety of the substance of the situation
This defines who this clown claims to be. “Just because I posted this doesn’t mean that I agree with it”.
Don’t officially say anything so I don’t have to defend anything. I will just post about how stupid others are. But never make a claim.
sfp needs to be ignored.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The point is, there is no objective outlet saying he was arrested for TERRORISM.
He posted that and every account/outlet repeating/reporting it goes back to his account stating it (without evidence)
quote:
Kent police said on Sunday night that a man, 41, had been detained at the Channel tunnel in Folkestone under schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, which allows police to stop, examine and search passengers at ports, airports and international rail terminals.
He was subsequently arrested “for frustration of a schedule 7 examination”, the force said, and was later released on bail while inquiries continue.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:14 am to UncleFestersLegs
LINK
Was waiting for this.
Thanks for updating.
I await SFP telling us how this was exactly what he said had happened originally and you just don’t get it on the level he does.
Was waiting for this.
Thanks for updating.
I await SFP telling us how this was exactly what he said had happened originally and you just don’t get it on the level he does.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:20 am to the808bass
Both articles in that link are very....typical
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:25 am to EZE Tiger Fan
They really can’t help themselves.
When I was younger, you could turn to the Editorial page to find out the political opinions of the newspaper staff.
Now, it’s on every page.
When I was younger, you could turn to the Editorial page to find out the political opinions of the newspaper staff.
Now, it’s on every page.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:32 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
He was subsequently arrested “for frustration of a schedule 7 examination”,
So not TERRORISM. Thank you for confirming.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:34 am to the808bass
quote:
I await SFP telling us how this was exactly what he said had happened originally and you just don’t get it on the level he does.
Read your own link
quote:
The person who is detained can be held for up to six hours, is legally obliged to answer questions and must provide the password or Pin for electronic devices, or be held to have committed a criminal offence if they refuse.
In an audio clip posted on Robinson’s X account, formerly Twitter, he is heard telling his ex-wife that officers have demanded the PIN code for his phone.
Robinson says he objected to the request because there would be legally privileged information on his phone, relating to an ongoing High Court case, and interviews that he has carried out relating to a documentary that he is making.
aka, not TERRORISM
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Schedule 7 of what?
LINK
Oh right. The Terrorism Act of 2000
I love that you can’t let this tar baby go.
LINK
Oh right. The Terrorism Act of 2000
quote:
Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides police officers with unique powers to examine people who pass through the United Kingdom’s borders. It allows them to stop, question and when necessary, search and detain individuals and goods travelling through the UK’s borders to determine whether they may be involved or concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.
I love that you can’t let this tar baby go.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 7:43 am to the808bass
quote:
Schedule 7 of what?
LINK
Oh right. The Terrorism Act of 2000
Irrelevant to what he was arrested for. That's just the title to a set of laws and not the specific law he's alleged of violating.
Was he arrested for TERRORISM, or a charge similar to obstruction of justice? The latter.
quote:
I love that you can’t let this tar baby go.
He wasn't arrested for TERRORISM. I was right on calling that bullshite out.
And you are the one who always likes to use the word sophist(ry), while doing it in that last post
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News