- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tommy Robinson arrested again
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:17 am to moneyg
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:17 am to moneyg
quote:
Are you denying it?
Uh, yeah.
I'm still for small government and the promotion of capitalism/trade as one of my primary focuses.
I want to gut federal spending.
I want to eradicate the Police State and the return of constitutional protections against state encroachment into our personal lives.
Now, less government will mean more social freedom too, which I've always supported. That will be spun as "Leftism" but that's part of libertarianism (and always was there. It's no change).
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:22 am to SlowFlowPro
Dude, you used:
as a source, and then doubled down on it.
Congrats on losing your virginity though.
Just don’t let her cut off your jewels.
quote:
the anti-racism group Hope Not Hate.
as a source, and then doubled down on it.
Congrats on losing your virginity though.
Just don’t let her cut off your jewels.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I discussed civil liability, which isn't even a government issue. Discussion =/= support.
You created the thread
Back to the topic, I think you are getting caught up in the semantics vs. reality.
I think the better description of you isn't necessarily a leftist...but a progressive. Your tactics to argue by making false or misleading claims, trying to redirect the argument, focusing on small details rather than the true subject being discussed is very in-line with your modern progressive who has no interest in the truth. This is how you approach every topic.
People who call you a leftist are just making a logical leap about why you do that. I think they are right. The truth is the truth, whether you admit it or not.
This post was edited on 7/31/24 at 9:33 am
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:32 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
as a source, and then doubled down on it.
Congrats on losing your virginity though.
Just don’t let her cut off your jewels.
So what policies did this implicate, specifically?
Posted on 7/31/24 at 9:34 am to moneyg
quote:
You created the thread
To discuss personal responsibility, yes.
quote:
I think the better description of you isn't necessarily a leftist...but a progressive.
Very tomato/tomato, but still lol-worthy
quote:
Your tactics to argue by making false or misleading claims, trying to redirect the argument, focusing on small details rather than the true subject being discussed is very in-line with your modern progressive who has no interest in the truth. This is how you approach every topic.
So you can't find any policies, and are creating a straw man about alleged rhetoric style.
So you really don't have any evidence of any political shift, do you?
Posted on 7/31/24 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So you can't find any policies, and are creating a straw man about alleged rhetoric style.
quote:
So you really don't have any evidence of any political shift, do you?
I didn't suggest you have shifted policy. I've commented on how you've changed overall. And, I clarified what I think most people notice. You are trying to restrict the conversation to your political stances which we know you aren't honest about (as evidenced by you not being willing to admit that you were supporting civil liability for those not vaccinated)
I don't know that you've shifted much politically. I think you've always been on the left. I just find you have zero intellectual honesty these days and your posts are almost always driven by an emotional response to something. It forces you to take absurd stances as you try to back into a logical argument.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 2:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I know you typically are on the "back the blue" side of things,
Welp. This shows how much you’re paying attention. Good effort, though.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 2:56 pm to moneyg
quote:I remember those threads.
as evidenced by you not being willing to admit that you were supporting civil liability for those not vaccinated
quote:You guys still don’t get it?
I don't know that you've shifted much politically. I think you've always been on the left. I just find you have zero intellectual honesty these days and your posts are almost always driven by an emotional response to something. It forces you to take absurd stances as you try to back into a logical argument.
This place is where SFP gets his dopamine hits.
He takes a contrarian stance on nearly every topic to entice an argument and attention.
There is a reason he has a post count as high as he does.
It is a drug for him.
This post was edited on 7/31/24 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 7/31/24 at 3:38 pm to Scruffy
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
Says authorities are holding him based on some Terrorism Act legislation. Arent you a lawyer? Then you should know governments have been using terrorism legislation to overreach and overcharge people.
quote:
There is no reporting, other than his twitter account, that this was used.
It appears some public order laws were used for police to deal with the protests (his were not the only ones going on at that time/place), but that's not applicable if he was arrested for contempt of court for an unrelated, non-protest, non-terror matter (showing the film).
12 pages later still taking L's
This post was edited on 7/31/24 at 5:05 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






