- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
To our pro-Honest Bob people on here. Do you believe Trump will eventually be indicted?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:14 am
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:14 am
Do you guys believe they'll eventually find something on Trump?
If so, what for?
If so, what for?
This post was edited on 4/11/18 at 8:15 am
20
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:15 am to Deuces
Not sure. I think a LOT of people around him are going to be indicted.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:15 am to The Spleen
quote:
Not sure. I think a LOT of people around him are going to be
What for though?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:15 am to The Spleen
For what?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:17 am to The Spleen
If Trumps people get indicted...the Obama/Hillary crew ought to be next.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:17 am to Deuces
quote:
What for though?
Write every possible charge on pieces of paper and put them in a hat; start drawing shite out
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:18 am to BBONDS25
quote:
For what?
For too much winning
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:18 am to BBONDS25
It’s all a wait and see situation. Right wingers on this board demand that the future be foretold by profits and seers. We just all have to wait and see.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:20 am to Deuces
quote:
Not sure. I think a LOT of people around him are going to be
What for though?
Aiding and abetting the coup against HRC.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:24 am to Deuces
This is the US government we are talking about. If they want you to go down for something, they will find it.
I'm not sure if Trump himself will ever be indicted as I think their whole goal is to simply destroy his reputation. Like another poster said though, people around him will go to jail because those people don't provoke a visceral response in Trumps supporters.
I'm not sure if Trump himself will ever be indicted as I think their whole goal is to simply destroy his reputation. Like another poster said though, people around him will go to jail because those people don't provoke a visceral response in Trumps supporters.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:30 am to Deuces
quote:Dunno.
Do you guys believe they'll eventually find something on Trump?
If so, what for?
If it's a bullshite charge like "Tweets that obstructed justice" there will be a monumental price to be paid by midterm democratic candidates.
However my guess is that Mueller will find at least:
- Federal election law violations
- Money laundering (through decades-old Russian mob connections)
- Tax fraud
We Dems knew that Trump was a money-laundering, mob-connected con artist back when everyone thought he was one of us.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:34 am to austintigerdad
quote:
e Dems knew that Trump was a money-laundering, mob-connected con artist back when everyone thought he was one of us.
If this is true, why did y'all love him so much? If you knew he was such a crooked person, don't you think it's aiding and abetting that behavior? What does that say about the democrats and their integrity?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:35 am to Deuces
quote:
What for though?
Not sure. I think there are several potential charges on the table for them, but I'm not privy to the evidence so really have no idea. My guess would be campaign finance, money laundering, and bank/wire fraud mostly.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:36 am to austintigerdad
Interesting on the tax fraud. As no disrespect: do you think that’s really a likely charge? It occurred to me when I read that, that he’s been audited every year for almost a decade (or at least claimed it). Do you think it’s likely Mueller finds something the IRS missed?
Secondly, all those charges have no connection to the campaign and collusion, the stated purpose of the SC. It’s an obstruction of justice cause of the blue dress kind of case then. That didn’t exactly help the GOP in 1998/2000.
Personally, I think the most likely charge will be obstruction or perjury, from something that hasn’t happened yet. Probably when he takes the stand in a few years and gets asked about some sexual conquest.
Secondly, all those charges have no connection to the campaign and collusion, the stated purpose of the SC. It’s an obstruction of justice cause of the blue dress kind of case then. That didn’t exactly help the GOP in 1998/2000.
Personally, I think the most likely charge will be obstruction or perjury, from something that hasn’t happened yet. Probably when he takes the stand in a few years and gets asked about some sexual conquest.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:38 am to Deuces
A better question is this.
Can any of them admit that quite obviously, the 2016 surveillance of a political opponent by the incumbent party was clearly out of bounds?
Back in 2016 to early 2017, these people said, "well, they wouldn't have surveilled if they didn't have a STRONG reason to.
Well. Um. If they had strong evidence then...........we wouldn't still be doing this silliness in April of 2018.
The bottom line is, our outgoing admin corruptly used the intelligence apparatus to attack a political opponent and their entire party is 100% fricking OK with it.
Can any of them admit that quite obviously, the 2016 surveillance of a political opponent by the incumbent party was clearly out of bounds?
Back in 2016 to early 2017, these people said, "well, they wouldn't have surveilled if they didn't have a STRONG reason to.
Well. Um. If they had strong evidence then...........we wouldn't still be doing this silliness in April of 2018.
The bottom line is, our outgoing admin corruptly used the intelligence apparatus to attack a political opponent and their entire party is 100% fricking OK with it.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:39 am to cokebottleag
quote:
Do you think it’s likely Mueller finds something the IRS missed?
If you've ever dealt with an IRS agent you'd know this would absolutely by likely.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:41 am to ShortyRob
quote:
back in 2016 to early 2017, these people said, "well, they wouldn't have surveilled if they didn't have a STRONG reason to.
This and they also said it was a lie. We can go back and find tons of threads calling him a liar and media stories saying that his accusations of surveillance weren't true.
Now we have gotten this far, and it turns out those accusations were very true, plus more, but everything's totally ok. Outgoing admins spy on opposition all the time and it's perfectly acceptable.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:42 am to The Spleen
quote:
If you've ever dealt with an IRS agent you'd know this would absolutely by likely.
Your experiences with the Service are different than most, then. 
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:43 am to Deuces
The investigation will not find anything. And it will continue until Trump is out of office.
Establishment politicians have far more to gain by the investigation continuing than ending, even if something is found.
Establishment politicians have far more to gain by the investigation continuing than ending, even if something is found.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 8:43 am to TBoy
quote:
Right wingers on this board demand that the future be foretold by profits and seers
And left wingers are convinced a conviction is coming. They have no evidence or reasons to believe this. But they believe.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News