- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:30 pm to dgnx6
quote:
What crime did she commit.
Identity theft (the CO law calls it "criminal impersonation"), whatever the CO law is for unlawful access of a computer/data system
The jury found her guilty of Attempt to influence a public servant, which is a CO law that I"m not specifically familiar with, but here is the statute:
quote:
Any person who attempts to influence any public servant by means of deceit or by threat of violence or economic reprisal against any person or property, with the intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant's decision, vote, opinion, or action concerning any matter which is to be considered or performed by the public servant or the agency or body of which the public servant is a member, commits a class 4 fe
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:30 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
She was literally doing her job
She was literally not.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:48 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
If she had been trying to change votes rather than trying to preserve the record of voting her sentence would be appropriate. The reality was that she was trying to preserve proof that dems were engaged in fraud as usual.
I can appreciate why you don't necessarily want to have to be in the position of delving into possible motives to excuse versus bringing down the hammer on activities such as this.
By the same token, I'd be shocked if there aren't any number of officials who have been found doing things similar, or worse, around election stuff who never sniffed a minute of actual prison time.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 2:13 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Folks who know the difference between Q & Anons have made the distinction since Q settled the matter in mid-Oct. 2020. Anyone who persists in the "QAnon" label after that is just trying to bludgeon folks with their ignorance.
:itsrealtomedamnit:
-Vox
Posted on 10/2/25 at 2:20 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, Tina
You leftist are all for reducing sentences for violent criminals but cheer on excessive sentences for you political opponents. You are a hypocrite
Posted on 10/2/25 at 2:25 pm to Bourre
quote:
You leftist are all for reducing sentences for violent criminals but cheer on excessive sentences for you political opponents. You are a hypocrite
Marxism never had a First Amendment or a right to free speech. They have always had "crimes against the state," mass liquidations, gulags, re-education camps and assorted other slave labor punishments.
Stalin built the Soviet subways with slave labor.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 2:34 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, Tina
I wish black fathers thought this way.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 2:37 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
Stalin built the Soviet subways with slave labor.
It's funny how the aesthetics of so much of Soviet architecture is so terribly drab, yet they somehow knocked it out the park in such an over the top manner with their freaking subway stations.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 2:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
She was an election official in Colorado who fraudulently used the identity of an IT person to access data she didn't have the authority to access and transferred that data to an unauthorized third party. That third party then published the data, which included personal data of voters in Mesa County, IIRC, and all sorts of sensitive data for the elections office.
Daniel Ellsberg thinks she ought to be released...
Posted on 10/2/25 at 2:45 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Are you suggesting that election fraud doesn't exist? You would say something moronic like that
It’s 2025, and people are still believing debunked claims of election fraud in this particular instance.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 3:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This and J6 prove they aren't.
At this point I’m not even sure MAGA can be called right wing or conservative. It’s like its own thing. Populist in nature but pulls from both the left and right in their ideology
Posted on 10/2/25 at 3:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
She was literally not.
Wasn’t she tasked with preserving the data?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 3:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
How long are they supposed to keep federal election records?
This post was edited on 10/2/25 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 10/2/25 at 3:52 pm to 56lsu
quote:Dude, 9 years..
you can't show these brainwashed maga's facts and expect them to listen. it's not in their dna.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:28 pm to loogaroo
quote:
How long are they supposed to keep federal election records?
The records were never threatened.
That was bullshite that the Lindell-adjacent charlatans used to make her think she had to do something. It was a fugazi.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:28 pm to loogaroo
quote:s
Wasn’t she tasked with preserving the data?
If it was her job to monitor and maintain the electronic data, she'd have had direct access and wouldn't have had to use a third party's credentials, illegally.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:07 pm to Nelson Biederman IV
quote:
something would have been done about this if it were legitimate
You're right. Something would have been done - they were going to delete the data showing fraud
Inexcusable naivety
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:07 pm to jclem11
quote:Which law? The election fraud?
So the right is no longer about rule of law?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:08 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
The reddest of red flags that a moron has been detected
SFP=fraud
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News