- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tina Peters data- 29k election records deleted or altered…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
She didn't do that herself, though, which is a major problem
She made it public. There was no intent to use the data in any other way than to reveal it.
quote:
Having another unauthorized third party steal it is another major problem
That’s what she was prosecuted for. But that’s not relevant to your statement that I responded to. That would have been a much better argument than “why didn’t she keep it”.
quote:
Using the ID fraudulently of another person is also a major problem
None of these things are legal or follow the proper protocols of the whistleblower statute
You ar moving on from the “why didn’t she keep it” argument? Say that if that’s the case.
1
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:55 pm to Warboo
quote:
You do not wonder why?
I'm assuming they're fricking idiots.
The vote totals were confirmed in recounts and various post-election analyses. The failure to certify a 0 count didn't have any net effect on the election.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:55 pm to Placekicker
quote:
He promised transparency and protection for whistleblowers, until…
Do you think I voted for Obama?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Here’s how black Jesus handled whistleblowers- They didn't follow the law.
Yeah follow the law and find out the true meaning of lawfare. You are a sick demented individual.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which of these that followed the law was thrown in jail?
If whistleblowers were expected to always follow the letter of the law what is the purpose of whistleblower protections?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:57 pm to moneyg
quote:
She made it public
She did not. She gave it to an unauthorized third party who works with Pillow man and HE made it public.
quote:
There was no intent to use the data in any other way than to reveal it.
Irrelevant to the underlying crimes.
quote:
That’s what she was prosecuted for. But that’s not relevant to your statement that I responded to. That would have been a much better argument than “why didn’t she keep it”.
My question was not the totality of my argument.
It was a specific response to this post
quote:
Tina Peters was trying the best way she knew to preserve the image of those voting records
Emphasis on the "to preserve" portion of his post.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think I voted for Obama?
Don’t care who you voted for. The last 2 Dem Administrations punished whistleblowers after offering transparency and protection.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:59 pm to shinerfan
quote:
If whistleblowers were expected to always follow the letter of the law what is the purpose of whistleblower protections?
You realize the whistleblower statutes have protocols and procedures in place to do the whistleblowing, right?
It's specifically to thwart idiots like Tina Peters from going rogue vigilante, especially while being influenced by third parties
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think I voted for Obama?
You probably voted for yourself you sick mfer.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The vote totals were confirmed in recounts and various post-election analyses. The failure to certify a 0 count didn't have any net effect on the election.
Common sense mfer. Use it for once.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's specifically to thwart idiots like Tina Peters from going rogue vigilante, especially while being influenced by third parties
You’re a little slow tonight, so I’ll spell it out to you.
In a blue state, under a Democrat Administration, anyone who whistleblows against them is punished, not protected.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You realize the whistleblower statutes have protocols and procedures in place to do the whistleblowing, right? It's specifically to thwart idiots like Tina Peters from going rogue vigilante, especially while being influenced by third parties
That would be awesome if the statutes would be followed. You know the truth mfer.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which ones who followed the law were ruined financially?
Anyone subject to lawfare.
You are okay with the government being weaponized against the citizenry.
I am not.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:07 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Anyone subject to lawfare.
The word that can't be defined, and if someone attempts to do so, won't defend their definition
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The word that can't be defined
Lawfare: The Weaponization of the government (via the DoJ and judiciary) so the judicial process can be utilized against members of its citizenry in order to suppress, oppress, ostracize, or intimidate.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Goodness Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:12 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
The Weaponization of the government (via the DoJ and judiciary) so the judicial process can be utilized against members of its citizenry in order to suppress, oppress, ostracize, or intimidate.
That definition covers basically every prosecution in history.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The word that can't be defined, and if someone attempts to do so, won't defend their definition
It’s ok, folks. Lawfare doesn’t exist. SFP just told us so. Those whistleblowers who were fired and indicted? Didn’t happen. Tina Peters who uncovered election fraud? Living free. And Trump? They totally didn’t make up charges to try to jail him. They didn’t extend the statute of limitations for one year to get Trump.
None of it ever happened. It’s all a figment of our imagination.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:14 pm to Placekicker
A whistleblower telling the truth, and yet some here act like she's the female version of Al Capone. Those peopke should be ashamed, especially the 2 so-called lawyers who are supposed to care about justice.
I guess the moral to this story is, "Cheating is okay as long as it's done against President Trump."
PS - Obtw, I watched something just yesterday. She's old (66?) and I believe she has lung cancer, but I believe they said that she's kept in solitary confinement for 22 hours a day.
#DESPICABLE
I guess the moral to this story is, "Cheating is okay as long as it's done against President Trump."
PS - Obtw, I watched something just yesterday. She's old (66?) and I believe she has lung cancer, but I believe they said that she's kept in solitary confinement for 22 hours a day.
#DESPICABLE
Posted on 12/22/25 at 8:15 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Lawfare doesn’t exist. SFP just told us so.
That's specifically not what I said.
quote:
Those whistleblowers who were fired and indicted? Didn’t happen.
Again, you still haven't found an example to answer my question.
quote:
Tina Peters who uncovered election fraud?
That has yet to be determined
quote:
They didn’t extend the statute of limitations for one year to get Trump.
Now you're mixing up civil lawsuits and criminal prosecutions. You're on a roll of failure
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News