Started By
Message

re: Tina Peters data- 29k election records deleted or altered…

Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:37 pm to
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
44412 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:37 pm to
"Clerical era"

-SFP
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85602 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Especially after seeing what the Obama and Biden Administration did to whistleblowers. Dems punish anyone who exposed their corruption.


laughs in Vindman
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54702 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Why not keep the data herself?


So steal the data and commit a crime?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

You are a goddamned idiot. They certainly changed the electoral votes on the presidency whether or not it would have changed who won the presidency.


That was not the implication of my comment.

Those were valid, legal votes. A clerk just didn't sign documentation that the machine counts were 0. People seem to think the votes themselves were fraudulent, which was the point of my comment. The clerical error didn't add votes for Biden or take votes from Trump.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

Releasing it into the public domai

She didn't do that herself, though, which is a major problem

Having another unauthorized third party steal it is another major problem

Using the ID fraudulently of another person is also a major problem

None of these things are legal or follow the proper protocols of the whistleblower statute
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7914 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:43 pm to
It’s not the Republican’s fault. They want this to happen. Republicans are complicit with the demorats.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13738 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

laughs in Vindman


Might wanna re-read the thread that contain articles and videos of how the Obama and Biden Administration punished whistleblowers.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Chelsea Manning


Did not follow proper protocols

quote:

John Kiriakou


Did not follow proper protocols

Again, my question was

quote:

Which of these that followed the law was thrown in jail?


Both occurred prior to the Trump era, I might add, which removes them from the framing of his post as well
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 7:45 pm
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13738 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

None of these things are legal or follow the proper protocols of the whistleblower statute


So let’s ignore the fraud on this technicality, especially given how whistleblowers have been treated under Dem Administrations…
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

So steal the data and commit a crime?


Her giving the data to a third party was another crime. Keeping it herself decreased her criminality
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13738 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:46 pm to
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55732 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Comey said no reasonable prosecutor would seek charges against Hilldawg because Hilldawg showed "no intent" to break the law although she destroyed evidence after being informed not to destroy said evidence.

Looking back on it all and what we now know about all of James Comey's deep state preservation / actions, he was going to bury the evidence for Hillary.
He was never going to allow it to harm her.
He was going to tie up the loose ends.


SloMoFo and BoozyDumbAss know this, it's why they steer clear.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90544 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:46 pm to
Crime!
Proper frickng protocol!

Legally irrelevant!

Old news!
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 7:47 pm
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
11388 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:46 pm to
So the judge denying for factual evidence to be used is interfering with an election?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

So let’s ignore the fraud

That's a separate discussion. No fraud has been proven. Some random on the internet has made unverified claims.

We're at the point where y'all have to admit she broke the law, first.

Then we can discuss the sentencing issues

Then we can get to whatever this guy is claiming

Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13738 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:47 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

SloMoFo and BoozyDumbAss know this


Tina Peters showed PLENTY of intent.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90544 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:47 pm to
Random
Irrelevant
Old news

Protocols!
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44231 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Which were thrown in jail?


None.

Their families were ruined financially.

Happy?
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5900 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 7:48 pm to
Watch the clip that the op posted and try to say lawfare does not exist mfer.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram