- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This sure sounds like a terrorist organization to me
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:23 am to SammyTiger
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:23 am to SammyTiger
quote:
The plaintiff in the case are arguing that they are not Venezuelan gang members and deserve a chance to actually defend themselves and continue to apply for asylum.
They are here illegally. Thats good enough reason to deport them. Deport every GD foreigner that is here illegally. ALL OF THEM!!
1
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:30 am to Smokeyone
quote:
The Supreme Court can take the case and if the president ignores them then congress can impeach him. Not some snot nose activist judge.
Well, that isn't how it works.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:54 am to thebigmuffaletta
Séamus Malekafzali @ @Seamus_M... • 6h
A French researcher was detained on arrival in the US, his computer and phone confiscated/ searched, and his texts criticizing Trump's cuts to scientific research were deemed by DHS agents as "hatred of Trump [that could bel described as terrorism." He was deported the next day.
According to a diplomatic source to AFP, the incident occurred on March 9. The space researcher was reportedly subjected to a random check upon arrival, during which his work computer and personal phone were searched. The same source also reported that messages discussing the Trump administration's treatment of scientists were found. He was reportedly accused of messages "that reflect hatred toward Trump and can be described as terrorism." His professional and personal equipment was reportedly confiscated, and the researcher was sent back to Europe the next day.
Reminder of freedom of opinion
According to another source briefed on the case to AFP, the French researcher was accused by the American authorities of "hateful and conspiratorial messages." He was reportedly informed of an FBI investigation, for which "charges were dropped," the source continued.
A French researcher was detained on arrival in the US, his computer and phone confiscated/ searched, and his texts criticizing Trump's cuts to scientific research were deemed by DHS agents as "hatred of Trump [that could bel described as terrorism." He was deported the next day.
According to a diplomatic source to AFP, the incident occurred on March 9. The space researcher was reportedly subjected to a random check upon arrival, during which his work computer and personal phone were searched. The same source also reported that messages discussing the Trump administration's treatment of scientists were found. He was reportedly accused of messages "that reflect hatred toward Trump and can be described as terrorism." His professional and personal equipment was reportedly confiscated, and the researcher was sent back to Europe the next day.
Reminder of freedom of opinion
According to another source briefed on the case to AFP, the French researcher was accused by the American authorities of "hateful and conspiratorial messages." He was reportedly informed of an FBI investigation, for which "charges were dropped," the source continued.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:03 am to TinyTim
quote:
A French researcher was detained on arrival in the US,
LOL you groomers are now going to pontificate over every incident. I love this so much.
You frickers want the worst of the worst here so bad that you are willing to post bullshite stories about other people coming in to defend them.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:03 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
What if the President is wrong in his application of the law? Is there any review of that?
What if he is right? I know! Lets take a vote from the people in the U.S.. Oh, we already did that.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:05 am to bama1959
quote:
They are here illegally.
They know this. They don't care. Progressives value illegals over their domestic enemies. As soon as that point registers, everything else makes sense.
They don't give two shits about laws or due process when it comes to you, but an illegal, violent gang member? Well, they deserve only the best accomidations and defense. Oh, by the way, you will also pay for this with your taxes.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:07 am to TinyTim
Unnamed sources huh?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:08 am to TinyTim
fricking alters
TinyTim
Member since Oct 2023
7 posts
TinyTim
Member since Oct 2023
7 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:44 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Well, that isn't how it works.
100% how it works. Neither congress nor the courts are a superior agency to the executive branch. Just like the executive can essentially sue congressional actions in courts to challenge their validity. 2 branches can override 1.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:51 am to Smokeyone
quote:
100% how it works.
No, it isn't.
quote:
Neither congress nor the courts are a superior agency to the executive branch.
They don't need to be for your claim that federal judges can't check the executive branch to be complete bullshite.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:00 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
What if the President is wrong in his application of the law? Is there any review of that?
Short Memory? Impeach!
Don't you remember Adam Schiff swore every day for months that he had the "Evidence" during the fake impeachment.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:
That being said, is TdA a "terrorist organization?"
Grok says:
TdA is considered a terrorist organization by Texas and, as of recent federal actions, by the U.S. government, based on its violent transnational activities and perceived threat to public safety and national security.
Whether this label fully aligns with traditional definitions of terrorism may still be debated, but the designations carry significant legal and operational weight in the jurisdictions applying them.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:20 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
They don't need to be for your claim that federal judges can't check the executive branch
So you honestly believe a rando judge is a superior agency to the executive branch of the government?
That’s insane. Especially in regards to The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798
Posted on 3/20/25 at 1:41 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
So you honestly believe
Believe has nothing to do with it. That's the way it is, whether you like it or agree with it.
quote:
rando judge is a superior agency to the executive branch of the government
Do you believe the executive branch is superior to the judicial branch?
This isn't some "rando judge," and there are processes in place.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:13 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Do you believe the executive branch is superior to the judicial branch?
The office of the president is a superior agency to a random judge. Yes unequivocally. Fast track it to the SCOTUS
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:12 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
The office of the president is a superior agency to a random judge.
The. Executive. Branch. Is. Not. Above. The. Judicial. Branch.
quote:
Yes unequivocally.
Wrong.
quote:
Fast track it to the SCOTUS
Your pivot changes nothing about what I've said.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:18 pm to Bunk Moreland
by the judicial system no, by congress yes. congrats you're an idiot.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:22 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
The. Executive. Branch. Is. Not. Above. The. Judicial. Branch.
In disputes between the President and _________ the SCOTUS is the agency that has jurisdiction. A random activist judge can rule, see the decision appealed and appealed again to the SCOTUS. While the appeals are going through the courts and the president ignores them (until SCOTUS) what recourse do you feel the lower court should have?
They can appeal to fast track appeals to SCOTUS and request they order an injunction. But beyond that what recourse do you feel they have? Are they going to imprison the executive branch? Realistically, not theoretically, what do you want the lower court to do?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:25 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
A random activist judge can rule, see the decision appealed and appealed again to the SCOTUS.
You understand that Congress could impeach Trump right now, right? They can, because that is how it actually works, not this wishcasting bullshite you're peddling.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:59 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You understand that Congress could impeach Trump right now, right?
They can theoretically try to impeach him (and have) over any nonsense they want (again have).
Do you see anyone in congress, even the dipshit progressive “squad” girls, moving impeachment proceedings through congress?
So, beyond theoreticals, what recourse do you believe or feel a random activist judge has now?
Page 13 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News