- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This sham of a closed hearing would be similar to this...
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:23 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:23 am to SlowFlowPro
You're awfully confident.
Any chance this works out for the Dems?
Any chance this works out for the Dems?
1
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:25 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Any chance this works out for the Dems?
yeah if they can keep mud slinging without recourse or proof that can obviously work
i don't think they're going to lose the house and may win the Presidency (but who the frick knows at this point b/c we have no idea who will win)
i was saying earlier that IF they do lose? the far Left is going to go utterly fricking insane
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:30 am to SlowFlowPro
With good reason. Rule of law would be turned upside down. e.g. DOJ was arguing in court this morning that Trump legit could shoot someone and can't be investigated.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:34 am to TigerDoc
quote:While i find that silly, let me know when he's actually done something that someone without TDS should give a frick about
With good reason. Rule of law would be turned upside down. e.g. DOJ was arguing in court this morning that Trump legit could shoot someone and can't be investigated.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:35 am to ShortyRob
No need to bother with you, Rob. 
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:36 am to TigerDoc
quote:
No need to bother with you, Rob.
Agreed. Because I'm not afflicted with your insanity.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:36 am to TigerDoc
quote:
With good reason. Rule of law would be turned upside down.
c'mon
but i guess that will be the commentary when the USSC goes 7-2 by 2024
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:37 am to TigerDoc
quote:
and can't be investigated.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:37 am to ShortyRob
You're pretty reasonable on trutherism, tho, so credit there.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:37 am to SlowFlowPro
c'mon, what?
They're not arguing it? The courts won't uphold it?
They're not arguing it? The courts won't uphold it?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:38 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Patience
When this conspiracy theory inevitably fails to get the bad orange man, will you deny you believed in it just like you deny you believed in the Russian collusion hoax?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:38 am to TigerDoc
quote:That's because I'm always reasonable.
You're pretty reasonable on trutherism, tho, so credit there.
But hell. 90% of what Democrats claim Trump did is bald faced lies and the other 10% is shite that I"m like, "yeah, and?"
Sorry. Being my political opponent doesn't suddenly confer immunity from investigation upon you.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 10:48 am to TigerDoc
quote:
The courts won't uphold it
you're also taking an extreme legal hypothetical, which is made for specific purposes of a constitutional issue (b/c you have to push the literal extremes), as a serious argument. it's rhetorical and not tactile, if you want to think of it that way.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
Well, sure. We're not at risk of a presidential shooting spree (I suspect Trump has never fired a gun).
But the fact that the lawyers are arguing so absolutely that a sitting president can't be investigated is ridiculous. The left and the right should oppose that idea. Especially government-fearing libertarians.
But the fact that the lawyers are arguing so absolutely that a sitting president can't be investigated is ridiculous. The left and the right should oppose that idea. Especially government-fearing libertarians.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 11:08 am to TigerDoc
quote:
But the fact that the lawyers are arguing so absolutely that a sitting president can't be investigated is ridiculous. The left and the right should oppose that idea. Especially government-fearing libertarians.
real libertarians aren't worried b/c it's a silly argument that won't win
it's the same as the insane arguments immigration attorneys have been making while judge shopping to get those injunctions that have basically all been slapped back. just lawyer stuff
Posted on 10/23/19 at 11:30 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
When this conspiracy theory inevitably fails to get the bad orange man, will you deny you believed in it just like you deny you believed in the Russian collusion hoax?
What exactly would I have to deny that I believe in here?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 12:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:no DA's office use an entire staff for one investigation. The OP isn't accurate. This is closer to a grand jury as said. This is not the trial. They still can't do the indictment vote without the full panel.
The entire body of Congress is the DAs office in this analogy
This is 100% what occurs in a grand jury 99.99999% of the time.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News