- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This Just In! NO ONE SAW Erika Kirk collapse in a parking lot
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:14 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:14 pm to AlterEd
quote:
You won't do it, will you?
This man here is a federal agent. Nothing wrong with that and I thank you for your service. But I am skeptical of any fed who has opinions on this topic. No offense intended and I hope you can understand my skepticism.
I've literally shared numerous times on this board that I am a Deputy US Marshal
There's people here and other Razorback sports forums where I go by the same username that know me in real life, and would laugh in your face right now as far as me being some sort of deep state "FED"
Great going Sherlock, you cracked the case!
ETA - I fail to see what any of that has to do with Candace Owens or the Kirk family. If you think either one is related to some sort of government psyop (let alone the US Marshal's Service being some sort of CIA/FBI adjacent agency) then you're nuttier than Candace.
When you scream about every little thing being a grand conspiracy, nobody is going to listen when you legitimately stumble upon the real conspiracies. Your credibility is shot. Alex Jones stumbled on a real conspiracy or two in his time that should've been huge news, but nobody took him seriously because of the other insane outlandish shite he spewed. Take notes.
I'm just a dude, while technically working for the federal government, has been to DC all of one time when I was a kid with my grandma. Yet you think taking the angle of "look he's a FED therefore nefarious!" is a proper way of attacking me - yet you can't understand that there's influencers and attention whores out there whom would attack someone like Erika Kirk just as nefariously and falsely for their own gain. You literally did it TO ME in this very thread.
This post was edited on 3/25/26 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:15 pm to the808bass
quote:
1) It’s not parody. It’s actual points Candace makes in her podcast.
2) I think most people know I’m mocking her.
By the downvotes, I assumed people thought those were “the views of this publication.”
And yes…
abject mockery is what that odd (and seemingly manufactured) sect deserves.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:18 pm to the808bass
What is Candace’s end game here? Like why is she so hyper-focused on tearing down this woman?
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:24 pm to 9Fiddy
I think it’s multi-faceted but still simple.
1) Her audience demands Erika content. If she doesn’t talk about Erika in a podcast, it performs miserably versus those that go after Erika.
2) She views herself as the heir to the right wing podcaster sphere.
3) She is jealous of Turning Point, people’s near veneration of Charlie and, most importantly, that Charlie chose Erika
4) She’s not an incisive thinker. The podcast I listened to today had her spending 20+ minutes on the “finding” that Andrew Kolvet wasn’t on the plane that he said he was on going to Provo the day of the shooting. Ergo, he was part of a military operation to kill Charlie. She gets sucked into the dumbest theories because her brain allows it.
1) Her audience demands Erika content. If she doesn’t talk about Erika in a podcast, it performs miserably versus those that go after Erika.
2) She views herself as the heir to the right wing podcaster sphere.
3) She is jealous of Turning Point, people’s near veneration of Charlie and, most importantly, that Charlie chose Erika
4) She’s not an incisive thinker. The podcast I listened to today had her spending 20+ minutes on the “finding” that Andrew Kolvet wasn’t on the plane that he said he was on going to Provo the day of the shooting. Ergo, he was part of a military operation to kill Charlie. She gets sucked into the dumbest theories because her brain allows it.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:30 pm to stlslick
quote:
it wasn't 2 long ago, the conservatards on here loved:
Candace
MTG
Bannon
etc
Literally were sucking their dicks
I called candace out as a grifter when she first began, mtg was an idiot before she was voted in, and bannon is a crook and shitbag
Then they found out that all of them were on Turkey/Muslim Brotherhoods payroll.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:35 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
What is Candace’s end game here? Like why is she so hyper-focused on tearing down this woman?
Clicks and views. She saw Erika Kirk thrust into the national spotlight after Charlie was brutally murdered on camera and got envious that another woman was receiving that level of attention in the press and in hearts and minds. Classic woman behavior to hate another woman receiving more attention than them. Women very famously hate eachother and will brutally undercut each other when given the chance.
It's not much deeper than that
Popular
Back to top


0







