re: They didnt even try to hide the money trail.Daycares in Mn donate $35 million to campaigns

So, according to you, evidence isn’t pr


Sure thing Jan.

[quote]The problem is that the conceptual framing of that conclusion jump is irrational, specifically how it's based in a binary in/out group paradigm. The implication is that there is a pre-approved script for approval within the in group (we call this NPC behavior) and anything outside of that script is supporting the out-group.[/quote

Holy word salad, take the L and move on. This is a stretch even for your lonely arse.

quote:

---

Wait until you find out what nursing homes do for state pols in LA ?

---

Please link to the information confirming that any of these nursing homes are fake. If they actually are performing services, it's hard to deny them their rights.
If they are just mailing addresses or empty buildings, then that's another matter.
Its amazing how some support criminal behavior.

quote:

---

Please link to the information confirming that any of these nursing homes are fake.

---

What in OP establishes that any of those are fake?

Also, you may be late to the party. I'll update you. OP doesn't even show donations to pols.

quote:

---

Also, you may be late to the party. I'll update you. OP doesn't even show donations to pols.

---

SlowPolsweren'tinonitpro!

Because there’s really not that many democrat voters and they have to commit fraud after fraud to keep the charade up. It’s like the lying and snowball adage.

quote:

---

quote:
This is his SOP. When he doesn’t like the direction a thread is going he will post something completely irrelevant and then argue his new point for 50 pages


So true.... I was curious what Grok would provide when asked about this type of person. So I asked! Lol

Grok:

quote:

What would you say about a person who is an extreme contrarian that always argues vague points of a topic and attempts to prove himself more intelligent than others?

A person like that—someone who’s an extreme contrarian, habitually argues vague or tangential points, and seems driven to prove intellectual superiority—tends to exhibit a cluster of traits that are more about personal insecurity than genuine intellectual curiosity.Here’s a breakdown of what’s usually going on:Chronic contrarianism often stems from a need to differentiate oneself rather than a pursuit of truth. Healthy skepticism challenges ideas constructively; extreme contrarianism rejects consensus reflexively, even when the consensus is well-supported. It’s less “I think this might be wrong because…” and more “Everyone’s wrong because I say so.”
Arguing vague points is a common tactic in bad-faith discussion. By staying nebulous or shifting goalposts, they avoid being pinned down and proven wrong. It’s a defensive strategy: if the point is never clear, it can’t be decisively refuted. This keeps them in the game longer and preserves the illusion of intellectual dominance.
The core motivation is often to signal superiority. Conversations become performances where winning (or at least not losing) matters more than learning or reaching understanding. This can be rooted in insecurity, narcissism, or a fragile ego that equates being wrong with being worthless. Proving “I’m smarter than you” temporarily soothes that fragility, but it’s a hollow victory because it alienates others and rarely leads to real insight.

In short, such a person isn’t usually the confident genius they’re trying to project. More often, they’re someone who’s deeply afraid of looking ordinary or fallible, so they adopt a posture of perpetual one-upmanship. It’s exhausting for everyone around them and, ironically, undermines their own intellectual growth—because you don’t learn much when your primary goal is never admitting you might be wrong.The healthiest response (if you have to deal with them) is to disengage or set firm boundaries. Engaging on their terms usually just feeds the cycle

---

Holy shite. Nailed it.

quote:

---

How are so many of you stupid enough to read the OP, and not immediately recognize it as complete bullshite?

---

7.5 hours of shame left