- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: They Are Now Growing Real Human Skin to Put on Robots
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:20 am to BoarEd
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:20 am to BoarEd
"The one thing that makes us human".
One of the most idiotic things ever said in human history. Nevermind all of our organs and millions upon millions of cells which have tiny factories working inside of them, and all the complexity. Oh, and that thing called a soul.
A robot will never know how to think. It will only "know" what people feed into it's database. But, sure, skin is the one thing that makes us human.
One of the most idiotic things ever said in human history. Nevermind all of our organs and millions upon millions of cells which have tiny factories working inside of them, and all the complexity. Oh, and that thing called a soul.
A robot will never know how to think. It will only "know" what people feed into it's database. But, sure, skin is the one thing that makes us human.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 12:21 am
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:23 am to Metaloctopus
Who said anything about putting skin on a robot is what makes it human?
ETA: Never mind, I realize you took that from the person in the X post. Yeah, I don't mean to endorse anything some random says on X about it. I only used the X post because it's easier to bring the information over to here. Otherwise I would have had to pull up the relevant links that I can't embed on this website and then share the images manually. Being able to embed X posts may mean sharing information from people whose opinions I don't necessarily endorse, but want to pass along their information anyways. If that makes sense.
ETA: Never mind, I realize you took that from the person in the X post. Yeah, I don't mean to endorse anything some random says on X about it. I only used the X post because it's easier to bring the information over to here. Otherwise I would have had to pull up the relevant links that I can't embed on this website and then share the images manually. Being able to embed X posts may mean sharing information from people whose opinions I don't necessarily endorse, but want to pass along their information anyways. If that makes sense.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 12:28 am
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:26 am to BoarEd
quote:
Who said anything about putting skin on a robot is what makes it human?
They're touting "DNA", but all it is is skin. Which I am completely opposed to even that, but there is way more to being human than cloning skin.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:31 am to Metaloctopus
Edited. And yes, it uses human DNA. The skin is made from living human skin cells. So it does use human DNA.
So technically, yes, the X user is correct. They have given robots the one thing that makes us human. Our very DNA.
So technically, yes, the X user is correct. They have given robots the one thing that makes us human. Our very DNA.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 12:33 am
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:32 am to BoarEd
quote:
ETA: Never mind, I realize you took that from the person in the X post. Yeah, I don't mean to endorse anything some random says on X about it. I only used the X post because it's easier to bring the information over to here. Otherwise I would have had to pull up the relevant links that I can't embed on this website and then share the images manually. Being able to embed X posts may mean sharing information from people whose opinions I don't necessarily endorse, but want to pass along their information anyways. If that makes sense.
I knew you weren't endorsing it, my comment was directed at the tweet, itself.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:33 am to BoarEd
quote:
Edited. And yes, it uses human DNA. The skin is made from living human skin cells. So it does use human DNA.
I do realize that, it's just that there's a whole lot of DNA missing when all you have is skin. They're oversimplifying what it is to be human, is my point.
edit- And, as I said before, you also need a soul. DNA, even if you have all of it, is not about to be "the one thing" that makes us human.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 12:35 am
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:39 am to Metaloctopus
quote:
it's just that there's a whole lot of DNA missing when all you have is skin.
We are splitting hairs now, but this isn't true. The DNA found in the skin cells is the exact same as the DNA found in brain cells. And every cell throughout the human body.
The distinction you're trying to make is the soul, or lack thereof. But my question is, once it gets to a certain level, how can you tell in a face to face interaction? You can't. As stated in the OP, it will soon get to the point where you won't be able to tell the difference between your neighbor and an AI driven NPC. And this isn't gullibility. This is where the science and the research is actually headed.
The question of the soul is a question for the man above.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 12:50 am to BoarEd
quote:
robots will be able to cut and bleed
So what? They'll never be able to distinguish right from wrong. They have no soul, no concept of eternal reward or eternal punishment. They're just robots, automatons; whatever sort of fleshly pursuits their designers attempt to furnish them with.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:32 am to BoarEd
quote:
We are splitting hairs now, but this isn't true. The DNA found in the skin cells is the exact same as the DNA found in brain cells. And every cell throughout the human body.
The distinction you're trying to make is the soul, or lack thereof. But my question is, once it gets to a certain level, how can you tell in a face to face interaction? You can't. As stated in the OP, it will soon get to the point where you won't be able to tell the difference between your neighbor and an AI driven NPC. And this isn't gullibility. This is where the science and the research is actually headed.
The question of the soul is a question for the man above.
This seems like a case of being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative with me.
One doesn't simply produce DNA, and poof, there's everything you need. The way the cells in the body read DNA differently to make up other body parts is not something you can replicate in a robot. And as for straight up cloning, we know that has been done with animals, but it always comes with defects.
But you seem hung up on trying to prove to me that it doesn't matter either way, because no matter what, it's a big deal. Well where have I disputed that? I said I was entirely against it, because I am. I am against any form of cloning, and I am against AI. My point was strictly that the tweet was dumb for saying they'd given robots the one thing that makes us human.
And why is the soul a question for "the man above", as you put it? It's not a question at all, because God has already answered it. He set humans apart from all other living creatures for a reason, and our soul is the greatest differentiating factor.
No person can understand what it is to be human, or have any meaning in life, if they don't start from the word of God.
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 1:47 am
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:05 am to BoarEd
That's impossible. They can get really close to it but only God is the creator no one else.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 6:05 am to BoarEd
There's some good to be done by science, then there's the the dr jekyl's out there that have truly evil things in their minds.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 7:24 am to BoarEd
quote:
Once we get something into our minds, we create it.
We need teleportation machines dammit!
Posted on 7/23/26 at 7:35 am to CCT
quote:
Clutching pearls? This is the future that can frick up the human race.
The atomic bomb? Your pants pissing is about 80 years too late.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 7:41 am to BoarEd
quote:
He had no idea what was said in the OP or in the first 3 pages of the thread
Nothing said in the first three pages of a tigerdroppings thread is going to change where our current tech is.
What I said was correct. This will require a circulatory system to work. And since its living tissue, now you have infection/hygiene issues.
Muh sweat glands!!!! What purpose would this serve outside of requiring you to clean this android more often to avoid skin degradation?
Maybe you're not gullible. Maybe you're just an idiot.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 7:44 am to Willie Stroker
quote:
quote:
As long as it fixes me a sammich after Ive treated her worse than a farm animal for hours in the bedroom..... I approve!
That’s a unique take.
Most of us don’t have a reference point of how we treat farm animals in the bedroom.
Do you treat chickens any different from calves or sheep?
Oh lawd!!! Wrapped kinda tight, huh??
It was a fricking joke! Actually, back in the day Andrew Dice Clay said in one of his stand up acts....
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:20 pm to lake chuck fan
Sounds like Replicant dermatoligist a hot new career path for someones kid.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:52 pm to BoarEd
Holy shite. They better be able to melanize some skin, or robots will also be called racist.
Posted on 7/24/26 at 6:02 pm to Lizardman2
Maybe Hypercolor robot skin that matches the malanin of whoever its interacting with at that particular moment.
Popular
Back to top

1






