Started By
Message
locked post

Theresa May attacks 'unacceptable face of capitalism'

Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:28 am
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8328 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:28 am
LINK

quote:

Businesses who pay excessive salaries to senior executives represent the "unacceptable face of capitalism", Prime Minister Theresa May has said. The "excesses" of some bosses was undermining confidence and "damaging the social fabric of our country", she wrote in the Mail on Sunday. Firms that face shareholder revolts over salaries and bonuses will be named on a new public register, Mrs May said. She also said firms could decide how workers are represented in boardrooms. The Conservatives' manifesto said executive pay should be approved by an annual vote of shareholders. Mrs May's article does not mention this commitment, but instead says firms that have a "shareholder revolt" on pay will be named on a new public register.

quote:

Mrs May said most of the UK's biggest businesses invested in their workforces and looked after the interests of employees and investors. However, she said that "too often in recent years we have also seen another, unacceptable, face of capitalism". A "minority of firms are falling short of the high standards we expect of them," she added. "Some have deliberately broken rules that are designed to protect their workers. "Others have ignored the concerns of their shareholders by awarding pay rises to bosses that far outstrip the company's performance."
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:30 am to
Government interference in business. What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Regret nothing that made you smile
Member since Oct 2005
13348 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:33 am to
Look, I'm all for capitalism and a free market. But when companies that make profits of 20 billion one year see they are only going to make 21 billion the next start laying off thousands of workers, then reward the top executives with multi million dollar rewards, I see red. And the businesses that provide life and/or health preserving services like health insurance, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies should be fricking ashamed at the amount they charge Americans compared to what citizens or governments in other countries pay.
This post was edited on 8/28/17 at 11:35 am
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29452 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Government interference in business.

What do you think would happen without antitrust laws?
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
7317 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:39 am to
quote:

But when companies that make profits of 20 billion one year see they are only going to make 21 billion the next start laying off thousands of workers, then reward the top executives with multi million dollar rewards, I see red


Their company, their decision.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:50 am to
quote:

What do you think would happen without antitrust laws?


Nothing that a free and socially connected market couldn't resolve. Antitrust laws are outdated and unnecessary.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260547 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Look, I'm all for capitalism and a free market. But when companies that make profits of 20 billion one year see they are only going to make 21 billion the next start laying off thousands of workers, then reward the top executives with multi million dollar rewards,
7

Are they supposed to keep workers to do jobs that aren't needed anymore?
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43119 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:54 am to
From a government that still has royalty and The Crown, interesting.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43119 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:55 am to
Not so subtle jab at Pres Trump.
Posted by toni_the_tigress
Member since Aug 2017
120 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Look, I'm all for capitalism and a free market. But when companies that make profits of 20 billion one year see they are only going to make 21 billion the next start laying off thousands of workers, then reward the top executives with multi million dollar rewards, I see red. And the businesses that provide life and/or health preserving services like health insurance, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies should be fricking ashamed at the amount they charge Americans compared to what citizens or governments in other countries pay.


Exactly. Greedy corporations lavish bonuses on executives while they lay off their workers. I'm sure most have country club and other private club memberships too.

We need to cap executive pay.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:56 am to
So are you really for free market?
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45123 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 11:59 am to
quote:

We need to cap executive pay.


We need to also cap pay for everyday workers. Food service, Auto workers, welders, oil field workers, and especially teachers and doctors and nurses and every other medical profession.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260547 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

We need to cap executive pay.


Do they teach Econ at LSU?
Posted by lsulaker
BR
Member since Jan 2009
1361 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:03 pm to
She just trying to pull votes from the Corbynites, which wont happen. It could cause her to lose alot of support from the right.
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8328 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

It could cause her to lose alot of support from the right.


British right ain't like the American right, Bubba.
Posted by athenslife101
Member since Feb 2013
18564 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:06 pm to
They're public companies most of the time. It isn't their company. It is the stockholders.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

What do you think would happen without antitrust laws?


Nothing that a free and socially connected market couldn't resolve. Antitrust laws are outdated and unnecessary.




The failure of the free market to solve the problems created by trusts/monopolies is the reason we have anti-trust laws. They are neither outdated nor unnecessary.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260547 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:


The failure of the free market to solve the problems created by trusts/monopolies is the reason we have anti-trust laws. They are neither outdated nor unnecessary.


Created by crony capitalism.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56503 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I see red


You sure do
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119155 posts
Posted on 8/28/17 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Look, I'm all for capitalism and a free market. But when companies that make profits of 20 billion one year see they are only going to make 21 billion the next start laying off thousands of workers, then reward the top executives with multi million dollar rewards, I see red. And the businesses that provide life and/or health preserving services like health insurance, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies should be fricking ashamed at the amount they charge Americans compared to what citizens or governments in other countries pay.


:kige:
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram