Started By
Message

re: There have been 295 drone strikes between Obama and Trump

Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:22 am to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Chinese Jack Ma once said, “ america has spent, 13 trillon in wars in the last 30 years, what if they have invest that money in their own people? ”


Is he assuming zero ROI?
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:24 am to
quote:

They are definitely acts of war



Whereas planning and directing attacks against US soil are acts of peace and love.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Ask the Yemeni villagers whose homes have been razed and whose family and friends have been blown to bits with our drones


Thanks Obama.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62610 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:26 am to
quote:

If past presidents had access to them, they would have used them as well.
Obama droned the isht outta the ME. Including targeting american citizens.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:30 am to
quote:


Whereas planning and directing attacks against US soil are acts of peace and love
oh I agree with you. I'm just making fun of the left hand ringing
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:31 am to
quote:

That’s how World War One was started.




Another nonsensical and totally historically incorrect talking point.
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19333 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:32 am to
quote:

That's your left today people.


Left = Filth
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:40 am to
quote:

quote:

IMO, Americans have accepted drone strikes as something lesser than traditional acts of war when the target is a relatively nationless, ideological threat like Islamic terrorism
Honestly I suspect that if Reagan had had drones he would have used them against Libya

Drones just allow us to do what we would have done with fighter jets without having to put pilots in harm's way
The distinction between a combat drone and a cruise missile is a fine one ... more one of scale than nature.

We have been using cruise missiles to achieve similar ends for a very long time.
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19333 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:43 am to
quote:

I shouldn't have commented at all.


This

Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62775 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:45 am to
quote:

There have been 295 drone strikes between Obama and Trump


How many under Obama and how many under Trump? Also, how many civilians and American citizens killed under each?
This post was edited on 1/4/20 at 8:47 am
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126262 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:49 am to
quote:

radicalize a population
They are in a perpetual state of radicalization. It is all their political and religious leaders have.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 8:57 am to
quote:

quote:

radicalize a population
They are in a perpetual state of radicalization. It is all their political and religious leaders have.
SCL is speaking in broader terms than the current scenario. His point is that drone strikes are painless to Americans, because none of our folks are put at risk. Thus, the lure to use them is greater.

On the receiving end, however, the effect of each class of strike is essentially the same.

Think back to Serbia. Hell, you were probably involved in that conflict (TFYS).

Serbia Christians would have been no less radicalized if we droned their apartment buildings and collateral-kill a bad guy’s neighbor than are Yemeni Muslims when we drone their villages and collateral-kill their goats.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:04 am to
Wolf's point is that they aren't going to play nice with us if we leave them alone, and he's absolutely correct.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:06 am to
And I agree with that proposition.

Both Wolf and SCL are bright posters, and each of them raises a valid concern.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Ask the Yemeni villagers whose homes have been razed and whose family and friends have been blown to bits with our drones whether or not this is war. We see drones as ways to avoid combat and troop deployments, but I see our reliance on them as an easy way to radicalize a population that would otherwise be indifferent to America.


We definitely should have been more careful in Yemen but let's not forget the Cole bombers came from Yemen and Yemen has probably been the hottest bed of terrorists in the world, so they are definitely not indifferent to us.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126262 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:19 am to
Their political leadership is not inclined to have a meaningful dialogue with us. And fortunately this was a very well executed mission with little to no collateral damage (not the norm). I am not concerned in the least bit that the Iranian government is outraged. They are in a perpetual state of outrage. And their people are (in my opinion) tuned out to this faux indignation. A win-win considering how this particular individual introduced weapons, fighters and technology into the war in Iraq that dramatically increased our casualties and the overall suffering of the Iraqi people. His demise is long overdue.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:26 am to
As to this operation, I am in complete agreement with you. On Day One, I posted a “Good Trump.”

But as to the broader issue, I do share some of SCL’s concerns. The bloodless nature of a drone strike (from the perspective of the aggressor) does give rise to a temptation to use them perhaps more often thean would be wise.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:27 am to
quote:

You’re ignoring the fact that the target of the drown strike was a high ranking national official. Terrorist or not


Let's not simplify things here that don't need simplifying just because he wore a nice uniform and was part of an organized military. Actions have consequences. We didn't kill him in downtown Tehran, he flew into a warzone and got into a car with his right hand man in charge of the embassy attack. And I'm sure there are even more electronic communications further justifying our actions.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:32 am to
quote:

There have been 295 drone strikes between Obama and Trump


So, Trumpkins were bragging about how tough Trump is and how weak Obama was.

Now you're refuting that by showing how many drone strikes Obama called for.



Trumpkins are just as hypocritical as never Trumpers.

Fact.
Posted by JimmyGQ
Member since Dec 2019
3 posts
Posted on 1/4/20 at 9:34 am to
Obama was droning US citizens that lived abroad without due process. Trump droned the leader of a terrorist group. One is tough, the other is illegal.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram