- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The whistleblower report isnt concordant with the call transcript
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:29 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:29 am
Thus the transcript is fake and we must believe the whistleblower who wasnt there during the call.
Is this really the case they are trying to run with peach mint on?
Is this really the case they are trying to run with peach mint on?
10
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:30 am to Cosmo
quote:
Thus the transcript is fake and we must believe the whistleblower who wasnt there during the call.
Is this really the case they are trying to run with peach mint on?
This is the same group that said John Kerry beat George Bush because exit polls were more accurate that the actual polls.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:31 am to Cosmo
Ignore the video showing the Defendant didn't commit the crime!
Convict him because someone was told he did it!
Convict him because someone was told he did it!
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:33 am to Cosmo
Exactly one year ago they were believing one of the worst "victims" in American history.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:33 am to SCLibertarian
Because they are sad they resort to insanity trying to unseat a duly elected President.
Two country solution?
Two country solution?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:33 am to Cosmo
quote:
Thus the transcript is fake and we must believe the whistleblower who wasnt there during the call.
Is this really the case they are trying to run with peach mint on?
We need to worry about being morally right, not factually correct
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:35 am to Cosmo
Why not ? Democrats don’t have any requirement that anything be plausible or truthful. So yeah, they will run with anything they can. They are in the post Constitutional phase of government- the French Revolution phase. They are The Mob.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:41 am to Cosmo
The complaint repeatedly accuses Trump of pressuring zalensky. This has been proven false by the transcript and refuted directly by zalensky. It also, without being witness to the call, assumed this was done to affect the 2020 election- which was never mentioned in the call. There is a reason this complaint had been dismissed by all of the governing bodies charged with reviewing it. It’s not worth the paper it’s printed on. Now we are finding out that Schiff has been sitting on this for months.
It’s a sad day for lady liberty
It’s a sad day for lady liberty
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:46 am to Cosmo
How could it be? The “whistleblower” had no personal knowledge of the call.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 9:09 am to Cosmo
quote:
Thus the transcript is fake and we must believe the whistleblower who wasnt there during the call. Is this really the case they are trying to run with peach mint on?
Hearsay and innuendos are the backbone on all Democrat attacks.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 9:32 am
Posted on 9/26/19 at 9:13 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
This has been proven false by the transcript
Not if you know the super secret world leaders code!
Posted on 9/26/19 at 9:44 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
It also, without being witness to the call, assumed this was done to affect the 2020 election- which was never mentioned in the call.
Did you see the Rudy G quote? Or the supporting documentation in the foot notes?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 9:48 am to bmy
I saw your momma’s titties.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 9:51 am to Cosmo
quote:
Thus the transcript is fake and we must believe the whistleblower who wasnt there during the call.
If someone tells me something and I pass it on, am I a whistleblower?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 9:53 am to Dale51
It’s a little more complicated.
Do you believe Orange Man is, in fact, bad?
Do you believe Orange Man is, in fact, bad?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 9:57 am to Cosmo
Sadly, we don’t have a media helping in holding people accountable. They instead are complicit in the spreading of lies.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 10:00 am to the808bass
quote:
It’s a little more complicated.
Do you believe Orange Man is, in fact, bad?
I heard someone say that, so I assume it must be factual?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News