- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:10 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
every illegal requires a hearing before deportation,
This is of course what this ruling means.
This post was edited on 5/16/25 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Great example of an utterly irrelevant comment based on emotion.
No. The irrelevant shite is lawyers standing around water coolers and masturbating with their minds.
Laken’s parents are without their child. That’s pretty relevant.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:11 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
leftist lawyer delaying bullshite
There is no partisanship involved in following laws and lawful orders of courts.
quote:
There are 20 million of them. It will only take 3,000 years to get rid of all of them
Not a justification for breaking the law or lawful orders of courts.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not a justification for breaking the law or lawful orders of courts.
It is for me. You can sit around and bemoan this with your wife.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Great example of an utterly irrelevant comment based on emotion.
So she was irrelevant?
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:13 pm to the808bass
quote:
The irrelevant shite is lawyers standing around water coolers and masturbating with their minds.
quote:
Laken’s parents are without their child. That’s pretty relevant.
Not to a discussion of the law.
Hell, there isn't any controversy with that sad case. He's clearly illegal and clearly committed a heinous crime. He's being punished (after being given proper due process) and isn't even being deported, I don't think.
What does that horrible tragedy have to do with an argument about the Presidential administration acting within the constraints of the Constitution and the statute authorizing specific authority re: deportation?
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:14 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
So she was irrelevant?
To this discussion? Yes.
In life? Obviously not.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not a justification for breaking the law or lawful orders of courts.
bullshite, if the vermin are allowed to breed us out of existence there will be no courts or anything else left.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not to a discussion of the law.
Sure. No one gave a frick about the law letting them in. You included. Now you’re all about the niceties of law. No sale.
quote:
What does that horrible tragedy have to do with an argument about the Presidential administration acting within the constraints of the Constitution and the statute authorizing specific authority re: deportation?
You’re not that dumb. frick yourself.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
To this discussion? Yes.
So her murderer wasn’t an invader, he was a citizen?
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is scant, if any, government coordination, specific goals, or any other hallmark of invasion.
Didn't it meet at least two of the criteria? What would government coordination and specific goals mean in the spirit of the act?
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:17 pm to the808bass
quote:
No one gave a frick about the law letting them in.
And Biden/the Dems lost in 2024 largely due to this executive discretion by Biden's admin.
Political choice and political consequences. Again, not relevant to this discussion.
quote:
You included.
quote:
Now you’re all about the niceties of law. No sale.
Biden did nothing illegal. I always disagreed with his policies in this area on a political level and still do. That political opinion doesn't change anything regarding the legality of his executive discretion in this discussion.
quote:
You’re not that dumb. frick yourself.
So, are you choosing not to answer my simple question? I know you're intellectually capable of doing so (unlike many others weighing in).
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:19 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
So her murderer wasn’t an invader,
Correct
Even if he was, was the Aliens Enemies Act even being invoked by the admin at the time of her murder? No. How is a discussion of the AEA relevant, then?
quote:
he was a citizen?
False choice fallacy
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:20 pm to loogaroo
quote:
the spirit of the act?
I'm not a leftist. I don't interpret laws this way.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:20 pm to jimmy the leg
Ignore the ruling like Biden did with Student Loans


Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So her murderer wasn’t an invader,
quote:
Correct
So he was invited in?
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Biden did nothing illegal.
No one cares about your definition of legal. It’s what a moral retard would argue. That’s because you’re morally retarded.
quote:
So, are you choosing not to answer my simple question? I know you're intellectually capable of doing so (unlike many others weighing in).
You just argued that Biden did nothing illegal by facilitating the illegal immigration and paying them to be here.
Then you suddenly can’t connect the dots.
Maybe you are that dumb.
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
False choice fallacy
Wow!
Popular
Back to top



2






