- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The level of naivety regarding the Iranian conflict is disturbing
Posted on 6/18/25 at 3:08 pm to somethingdifferent
Posted on 6/18/25 at 3:08 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
somethingdifferent
you're just spewing MSM bullshite and claiming they are facts
the stupid emotions are from you, you're a spoiled little bitch warmonger supporter, and you come across like a video game "warrior"
I know, because I drank the dipshit koolaid from GW Bush back in 2003 on Iraq, and I was an idiot for doing it. I finally saw the light. You're the same way, and you're bearing down on stupid.
the biggest state sponsors of terrorism in the Middle East are the govts of Israel and Saudi Arabia (tied at the hip)
2
Posted on 6/18/25 at 3:09 pm to somethingdifferent
The level of naivety regarding the negative effects of US overseas intervention since WWII is disturbing.
This time will be different …
This time it’s necessary…
Smoking gun …. Mushroom cloud …
Libya seems great. Iraq seems great. Syria seems great.
I’m sure destabilizing a country of 90 million people which is 10x the size of Libya won’t have any negative orders of magnitude.
This time will be different …
This time it’s necessary…
Smoking gun …. Mushroom cloud …
Libya seems great. Iraq seems great. Syria seems great.
I’m sure destabilizing a country of 90 million people which is 10x the size of Libya won’t have any negative orders of magnitude.
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 6/18/25 at 3:38 pm to LSUAngelHere1
Or a troll given the overly simplistic Sean Hannity type of reasons.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:34 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Here are the nine countries with nuclear weapons. Russia, The United States, China, France, The United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea.
There is a very stark difference between Iran and all of these other countries. We have lived under the sense of safety that is brought by "Mutually Assured Destruction". They won't use their nukes because they will get nuked in return. Islamist states have shown us that they don't care if they die for their cause. They have 40 virgins or some shite waiting for them on the other side. They are glad when their children die as "martyrs" .... They do not value life in the same way the other countries do. That makes them uniquely terrifying to me.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:37 pm to TigerBaitOohHaHa
quote:
Islamist states have shown us that they don't care if they die for their cause.
They don't care if their peons die. The people at the top of the food chain care a great deal about not dying. you don't see those at the top strapping on the suicide vests.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:39 pm to somethingdifferent
Correct and it’s no surprise the doomsday pushers on this topic are lefty’s.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:42 pm to ned nederlander
quote:Depends on the deal but if it is part of the mitigation strategy, then I'm all for it. Whatever continues to fight terrorism and keep them at bay - over there
What are you going to say when this iteration of the conflict ends in a “deal” with these terrorists?
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:43 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:This is still naive no matter how many times it gets restated
I don’t see any obvious imminent threat to the US and most would agree there is none
quote:OUR threat from Iran
their threat from Iran
quote:I've already addressed this comment
Russia, North Korea, Pakistani and maybe a few other problem countries have Nukes yet we don’t do anything to them
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:44 pm to lsu777
quote:It's astonishing. People say crap like this but can't refute the facts
the BS the OP was spouting
quote:Was it true then like it is now?
we have heard everything he is spouting about previous conflicts
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When was the last Iranian attack in one of the 50 states?
What an idiotic question. I bet you don't even know why it's idiotic even after reading this thread and it being addressed about 50 times already
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:46 pm to FTBLFN
quote:What does this have to do with Islamic terrorism?
When is the last time a foreign enemy executed military operations on US soil?
Besides, what you're saying is that because something hasn't happened, well let's just let our guard down and relax. If you're not saying that, then you agree with the posture of the OP
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:47 pm to jchamil
quote:
The people at the top of the food chain care a great deal about not dying
Fine, they don't care about their own people--which is why they will give the orders from their penthouse in Moscow. Doesn't make me any less nuked. Point still stands
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yeah, you're right. The Iranians don't really have anything to do with Islamic terrorism. I was WAY off
I see 911 and AQ ties, which screams Saudi influence, not Iranian
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:49 pm to RobbBobb
quote:Yeah, I noticed that
How did you reply to my post before I even posted it?
How does that happen
CHICKEN. SHOW YOURSELF
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:51 pm to omegaman66
quote:I did my part
Did you rise up against the illegitimate Biden presidency?
Besides, as stupid as he is, we weren't lobbing hundreds of missiles at civilian targets
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:52 pm to Sharlo
quote:Why do people keep posting the same already refuted points over and over
The neocons and MIC have been screaming about Iran’s nuclear ambitions since the 80s. What’s changed in the past week?
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:52 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Yeah, you're right. The Iranians don't really have anything to do with Islamic terrorism. I was WAY off
We ( the CIA) created most Islamic terror groups.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 4:58 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:The OP is showing precisely how to not be naive, as opposed to naively burying your head in the sand about the real world
No, you didn't address at all how you could be so naive
quote:Let me know when you have an actual response
If you had read my entire post, like I read your entire OP diatribe, you would have seen the answer to the question you keep asking over and over
quote:What does this have to do with the fact that we have enemies we should protect ourselves from?
You are wrong. The erosion of our Constitutionally protected rights began before Islamic terrorism
quote:Let me know when you have an answer
I addressed it in my post. You should really read a post in its entirety before starting to comment on it - like I did yours
quote:I stated facts in the OP. America has enemies. It's reality
Oh, so you're a fricking pearl-clutcher
quote:That's not true. They want us to die
They don't want ANYTHING from us
quote:You're not suggesting this is why they attack us, are you? If not, what's your point?
But we don't care, we try to force it on them anyway
quote:It is not fear mongering that the US has real enemies. My word
fear-mongering
quote:Sigh. You can't actually believe this will somehow cure the khawarij from attacking infidels, do you?
Then we should just leave them the frick alone, and stop meddling in the internal affairs of sovereign nations
Posted on 6/18/25 at 5:00 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:Name them
you're just spewing MSM bullshite and claiming they are facts
quote:It is a fact that the US has enemies. Apparently you're too dull to understand that
the stupid emotions are from you
quote:Nope
you're a spoiled little bitch warmonger supporter
quote:Iraq had WMDs
I drank the dipshit koolaid from GW Bush back in 2003 on Iraq
quote:That changes nothing about the current Iran situation
the biggest state sponsors of terrorism in the Middle East are the govts of Israel and Saudi Arabia (tied at the hip)
Posted on 6/18/25 at 5:02 pm to mule74
quote:Addressed in the OP
The level of naivety regarding the negative effects of US overseas intervention since WWII is disturbing
quote:Can you prove that US actions in those areas had NO positive impact on Islamic terrorism? No, you can't
Libya seems great. Iraq seems great. Syria seems great
quote:
I’m sure destabilizing a country of 90 million people which is 10x the size of Libya won’t have any negative orders of magnitude
You don't think that would hinder the Iranian govt from funding and organizing terrorists? Of course it would. Don't be obtuse like SFP
Page 20 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News