- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The justification for owning tatical weaponry
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:28 pm to geauxskeet
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:28 pm to geauxskeet
He was kinda joking.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:35 pm to Kriegschwein
That’s pretty much one of the only types of weapons that military uses that civlallins can buy without special permits, licenses, tax stamps, etc...
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:35 pm to rebeloke
No justification needed. We can purchase whatever is legal. It's not all of our fault when someone commits a crime with a firearm.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:37 pm to rebeloke
quote:
All military grade weapons are up for discussion.
I'll bite if your knowledgeable enough to acknowledge that a .223 AR15 is not a "military grade weapon".
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:40 pm to BACONisMEATcandy
I never saw an AR-50 in the military.
Saw a bunch of Barrett .50s but never an AR-50
The military doesn’t care for single shot anything. Except maybe grenade launchers.
Saw a bunch of Barrett .50s but never an AR-50
The military doesn’t care for single shot anything. Except maybe grenade launchers.
This post was edited on 2/25/18 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:04 pm to TigerFanatic99
I really think you mistake me for the anti-gun crowd.
I don’t care what you call it, what I care about is where you think the line is.
I don’t care what you call it, what I care about is where you think the line is.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:05 pm to rebeloke
If you can't define what you are talking about, how can you have a coherent discussion?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:26 pm to rebeloke
quote:
All military grade weapons are up for discussion.
FFS. You have no clue what you’re talking about. I’m willing to bet you couldn’t tell the difference between a 5.56 round and a .22 round.
Because a Ruger Mini 14 and an AR shoot the same ammunition and are both semi automatic rifles. But one makes you nervous because it looks “scary.”
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:27 pm to elprez00
The Mini does not sound dangerous.
It's mini for fricks sake.
It's mini for fricks sake.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:28 pm to Kriegschwein
I thought my sarcasm was obvious.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:28 pm to TigerBait1971
If it made a high pitched noise and looked like Pelosi Galore it could run for Congress as a Democrat.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:43 pm to rebeloke
Most Americans don’t own military grade rifles. Lord knows I would not want to put an off the shelf AR-15 against a military grade AK-47 or M4.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:57 pm to rebeloke
quote:
ust interested in hearing the pros and cons in arguments for owning tatical weapons. All military grade weapons are up for discussion. Should private citizens be allowed to own military grade weapons?
My AR is not military grade. It is a simple semiautomatic rifle that has a 30 round clip.
A Military Grade Weapon would have a selector switch which would allow it to operate as a semiautomatic or as a repeat fire in either/or burst mode and fully automatic.
The AR platform simply allows you to quickly change out accessories such as flashlights, sights, optics or laser pointers/rangefinders. This makes it easy to customize.
The round most common for the AR platform is the 5.56x45mm and/or .223 Rem.
It is a relatively small round that has little use as a large game hunting caliber.
It’s best characteristic is it’s high speed flat trajectory and low weight but it is not the choice for large game. There are many semiautomatic rifles that fire a much more powerful round that will cause much greater damage.
The AR is demonized by those that are completely ignorant of firearms and want to create a boogie man to scare the masses to create an environment indicative to gun confiscation for political gain.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:58 pm to rebeloke
Shall not be infringed upon...
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:07 pm to Wtxtiger
Actually an AR fires in an arc.
Not very flat.
Not very flat.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:11 pm to elprez00
WHY does it matter what I think? What matters is what should be legal and how you justify it.
For example, if you outlaw any weapon based on lethality, then that opens a concurrent law that should apply to vehicle or aircraft. I mean if we outlaw military weapons then it follows vehicles and aircraft would be outlawed as well.
For example, if you outlaw any weapon based on lethality, then that opens a concurrent law that should apply to vehicle or aircraft. I mean if we outlaw military weapons then it follows vehicles and aircraft would be outlawed as well.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:21 pm to rebeloke
Is there a military that actually equips their forces with AR-15s?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:23 pm to rebeloke
quote:
Just interested in hearing the pros and cons in arguments for owning tatical weapons.
My home being broken into is a highly tactical situation.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:24 pm to Volvagia
I handle would handle that with my 870.
Highly effective.
Highly effective.
Popular
Back to top


1






