Started By
Message

re: The Hill: Unvaccinated people should expect to catch COVID-19 every 16 months...

Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:55 am to
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46346 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:55 am to
quote:

well, this is unfortunate...

quote:
The study determined that natural immunity is somewhat short, and in a model where everyone has either been infected with COVID-19 or vaccinated against it, those who are unvaccinated can expect to be reinfected with the coronavirus roughly every 16-17 months.


Weird stuff man. Currently the real concern and story should be the increasing hospitalizations and deaths from breakthrough COVID-19 infections of the fully vaccinated. Many in Israel have been hospitalized after their 2nd booster......weird level of gaslighting by the authoritarians, I'm not surprised.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
31037 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:55 am to
They are trying really hard to fight off knowledge of natural immunity. Even making up pure BS.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119028 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:55 am to
quote:

bullshite


This is the right answer.

Posted by Frac the world
The Centennial State
Member since Oct 2014
16928 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:56 am to
First off, bullshite study.

2nd off, I don’t give a shite? I had it, it ain’t gonna be worse each time it’s gonna be easier.
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6369 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:57 am to


its been over 16 months for my entire family that has caught it and my dad has gone through 2 different cancer treatments since then and works at one of those horrible places called a school (Prek-8th)....This shite is a fraud....oh and they arent vaccinated
Posted by Syntax
FL390
Member since Aug 2020
964 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:58 am to
quote:

quote:
How often are vaccinated people catching it?


you and i both know there's not a study for that.


Why isn't there a study for that? The CDC is hell bent on keeping that info under wraps. They carefully choose their words in reports so that specific info is unavailable. Ive gotten into several Twitter arguments with one of the CNN reporters who gets tongue tied trying to explain the various studies that leave out the inconvenient truth about it.
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
6137 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 10:58 am to
The 1st US case was in Jan, 2020 (21 months ago), so I guess I'm 5 months overdue for my 1st time to have it. Although, there was that little bit of a dry cough I had for a couple of days in July, 2021.
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 11:18 am
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24969 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:01 am to
It's been 19 months since I had it. I've not taken the experimental injection. I've not been reinfected.

The Hill is full of shite.
Posted by millerf43
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2019
457 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:03 am to
From the article:

“The overall goal of the study was to provide an answer to a question that at this point in the pandemic would be impossible to answer empirically, which is how long after you’ve been infected by SARS-CoV-2 can you expect to possess immunity against the virus before you become vulnerable to reinfection?”....

"...in a model..."

I stopped reading at "model." I think it's safe to assume the model fails to account for these "defective" vaccines.
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Still that is three times longer than the vax last.


Yet you claimed once you catch covid you are protected for life.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17503 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:05 am to
And how often will the vaccinated get infected…..asking for a 4 star general buddy of mine!
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124186 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Methods
We conducted phylogenetic analyses of the S, M, and ORF1b genes to reconstruct a maximum-likelihood molecular phylogeny of human-infecting coronaviruses. This phylogeny enabled comparative analyses of peak-normalised nucleocapsid protein, spike protein, and whole-virus lysate IgG antibody optical density levels, in conjunction with reinfection data on endemic human-infecting coronaviruses. We performed ancestral and descendent states analyses to estimate the expected declines in antibody levels over time, the probabilities of reinfection based on antibody level, and the anticipated times to reinfection after recovery under conditions of endemic transmission for SARS-CoV-2, as well as the other human-infecting coronaviruses.
Findings
We obtained antibody optical density data for six human-infecting coronaviruses, extending from 128 days to 28 years after infection between 1984 and 2020. These data provided a means to estimate profiles of the typical antibody decline and probabilities of reinfection over time under endemic conditions. Reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 under endemic conditions would likely occur between 3 months and 5·1 years after peak antibody response, with a median of 16 months. This protection is less than half the duration revealed for the endemic coronaviruses circulating among humans (5–95% quantiles 15 months to 10 years for HCoV-OC43, 31 months to 12 years for HCoV-NL63, and 16 months to 12 years for HCoV-229E). For SARS-CoV, the 5–95% quantiles were 4 months to 6 years, whereas the 95% quantiles for MERS-CoV were inconsistent by dataset.
Good God Almighty that is a crap study!

It is an extrapolation based on secondary extrapolations based heavily on studies of non-SARS-CoV-2 coronaviruses. i.e., an extrapolation of an extrapolation of a guess.

And what's worse? They don't run comparatives with vaccination.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124186 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Even making up pure BS.
Yep.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:09 am to
There have been two studies that describe natural immunity from having covid as "ROBUST" and "LONG LIVED"

similar to the rest of coronaviruses immunity..

one thing suspect in this statement is their choice of "every 16 months" which just so happens to cover just about everybody who has previously had covid and enjoying natural immunity and the best immunity possible...

A study in 2008 with the few remaining survivors of the 2018 Spanish flu described near 100% immunity remained after 80+ years, and those that were studied for virus T and B cells found them as well.

So, this sounds like DEMOCRAT PROAGANDA regarding their bioweapons program that they have used against Americans. We'll see - but I have already seen enough.

THEY NEED TO BE ELIMINATED FROM ANY AND ALL AMERICAN PUBLIC LIFE - EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM
Posted by ArHog
Muss is a coward
Member since Jan 2008
33205 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:09 am to
I'm 63, been covid free for 17 months. I've been exposed 3 times that I'm aware of. I suppose I have natural immunity.




Oh and frick this authoritarian bull shite!
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
3557 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:10 am to
quote:


Yet you claimed once you catch covid you are protected for life.



You seem to be conflating “catching it” with not being protected from it. That’s dumb.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:11 am to
quote:

It's been 19 months since I had it. I've not taken the experimental injection. I've not been reinfected.

21 months for me, which makes it look like their "16 months" choice a propagandist tool for the DEMOCRAT PARTYS bioweapon program
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:16 am to
quote:


You seem to be conflating “catching it” with not being protected from it.


Well how would you define protected for life?
Posted by TigerVespamon
Member since Dec 2010
6137 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:20 am to








mouton defends pedo-joe
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 12:15 pm
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17514 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 11:38 am to
Can us purebloods just sign a MOU that we accept the risks of getting COVID and move on?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram