Started By
Message

re: The GOP wants to add $3T to the debt

Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:45 pm to
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
115596 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

I'm all for paying less in taxes, but it has to come with a massive, massive reduction in spending.

No, tax cuts spur economic activity. Let's say Acme wants to expand their reach by building 5 more stores in different states. But corporate taxes are high and that will make profit expectations too low to take the risk. The President cuts corporate taxes, Acme jumps on it and builds (along with 100 other businesses that were sitting on plans). Acme pays property owners, builders, electricians, etc. Those parties all pay more income tax from the job.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53136 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

4.5T in tax cuts, $1.5T spending cuts.


Last time they cut taxes receipts increased. This is a really dumb OP.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53136 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

The deficit increasing since those tax cuts proves you wrong though.


That’s because spending wasn’t cut. Good Lord.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53136 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

The debt is shifting to a new swamp Elon will make out like a bandit


Your ignorance knows no bounds. Elon lost a government contract with Tesla because of his engagement with DOGE. Like usual, the exact opposite of what you say is what is actually happening.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53136 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

And a larger deficit than prior to his term. Deficit spending is deficit spending.


It amazes me how stupid some of you are.
Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1620 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:55 pm to
Or it can go in the pockets of CEOs. I find it interesting that the corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21%, and CEO pay has consistently increased 12-13% a year for the last 8 years.

Also, this study proves otherwise. The tax cuts of 2017 had no tangible effect on corporate investment.

LINK /
Posted by lazlodawg
Member since Sep 2017
540 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:57 pm to

FY 2016 $3.27 trillion
FY 2017 $3.32 trillion
FY 2018 $3.33 trillion <- Most provisions of the TCJA go into effect.
FY 2019 $3.46 trillion
FY 2020 $3.42 trillion
FY 2021 $4.05 trillion
FY 2022 $4.90 trillion
FY 2023 $4.44 trillion
FY 2024 $4.92 trillion <- 47% Increase since tax cuts

The stimulating effects are not instantaneous and it's pretty plain to see that we have a spending problem and not a revenue problem.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53136 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Also, this study proves otherwise. The tax cuts of 2017 had no tangible effect on corporate investment.


Receipts went up, dummy.

quote:

Or it can go in the pockets of CEOs


What goes in the pockets of CEOs. More of a companies profits? You would rather it go to the government? Pathetic.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
78920 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 12:58 pm to
We should try something different.

Politicians and the irs like to scream they need more money, pay your fair share, the tax gap! Oh my.

Why don’t we lower taxes, stop having a complex tax code and be transparent on where exactly every cent goes. Then you might not have a bunch of people doing anything they can to not pay taxes.





Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1620 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:02 pm to
BBONDS you are a complete fricking moron. They went up, but went up less than they would have without the tax cuts. But I wouldn't expect anything different from your smooth brain.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
115596 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Or it can go in the pockets of CEOs.

No, that's not what's driving the explosion of CEO pay. It was covered in the book I recently read. CEO salary increases have jumped due to semi-monopolies. They simply make more money by raising prices of the product/service and lower the wages of workers due to the lack of competition. Free markets means competition. If 2 or 3 businesses control 100% of a product that is not a free market. The 2 or 3 do not compete because they are working jointly. It goes like this:
Board member: 'Boss, our major competitor just raised his price on widgets by 30% . We're gonna beat him in sales now!"
CEO: 'NO! Raise our price by 30%. Then cut worker's pay by 5% He'll follow suit and we'll both get rich!"
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
450815 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

FY 2016 $3.27 trillion
FY 2017 $3.32 trillion
FY 2018 $3.33 trillion <- Most provisions of the TCJA go into effect.
FY 2019 $3.46 trillion
FY 2020 $3.42 trillion
FY 2021 $4.05 trillion
FY 2022 $4.90 trillion
FY 2023 $4.44 trillion
FY 2024 $4.92 trillion <- 47% Increase since tax cuts


Out of curiosity, what's the % increase from 2011-2018?

*ETA: looks like 44.8%
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 1:08 pm
Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1620 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:03 pm to
Book name? I'm interested in reading it.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53136 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

BBONDS you are a complete fricking moron. They went up, but went up less than they would have without the tax cuts. But I wouldn't expect anything different from your smooth brain.


you’re a tax expert, huh. I’d love to hear more. Your post, by the way, is pure conjecture. How much more would receipts have increased without the cuts?
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 1:12 pm
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
17908 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

It happened with Reagan, too.


Also happened with JFK. That's where the so called Great Society money came from.
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
17908 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

The last Trump tax cut took money out of the unproductive government's hands and put it into the people's hands and the productive economy.


This point cannot be emphasized enough with the veil of USAID coming off.
Posted by WoodCrafter
Member since Jan 2010
868 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

The deficit increasing since those tax cuts proves you wrong though.


You are incredibly stupid, just damn
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
115596 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Book name? I'm interested in reading it.


The Myth of Capitalism by J. Tepper. It also covers a lot of history. Mistakes in economics are not new. We just didn't learn from what happened to similar policies in other societies centuries ago. The writing style is very good. About 1 of every 10 books I buy turns out to be a horrible writing style.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3877 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:23 pm to
Nope.

Inflation is a natural byproduct of every economy.

The excess inflation we’ve seen over the past 5 years was due to a global pandemic
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281843 posts
Posted on 2/13/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:


Inflation is a natural byproduct of every economy.


Here we go with the MMT proponents.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram