Started By
Message

re: The french riots over carbon taxes should be a wake up call for some liberal policymakers

Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:57 pm to
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Why would insurance be cost prohibitive?


Because self driving vehicles will be safer (cheaper to insure) by an order of magnitude
This post was edited on 11/26/18 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90774 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Because self driving vehicles will be safer by an order of magnitude

SO, that will be super cheap, accidents go down, so why would anyone else's skyrocket?
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4607 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:05 pm to
This is the most French thing I have ever read...

quote:

By nightfall the Champs-Elysees was smoldering and in the Place de la Madeleine, burned scooters lay on the sidewalk like blackened shells.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8646 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

quote:
Why would insurance be cost prohibitive?


Because self driving vehicles will be safer (cheaper to insure) by an order of magnitude



Why would combustion engine vehicle insurance premiums be significantly costlier and riskier than they are now in the event EV insurance pools have an alternative risk pool?

If anything, risk premiums for those who choose to keep non-automated and non-EV vehicles will go down. The risk profile will shift significantly towards those who are better drivers as it is.
This post was edited on 11/26/18 at 1:14 pm
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

SO, that will be super cheap, accidents go down, so why would anyone else's skyrocket?



Accident prone driver in a sea of self-driving low risk vehicles. Seems obvious.
This post was edited on 11/26/18 at 1:45 pm
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90774 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Accident prone driver in a sea of self-driving low risk vehicles. You tell me

Accidents still go down Broheem.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:47 pm to
And the self driving vehicles are only 8 years away because they were 10 away 2 years ago

I have that marked

Yep they will interact with each other perfectly in only 8 years
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76527 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Accident prone driver in a sea of self-driving low risk vehicles. Seems obvious


So his rates should go down in a sea of low risk drivers no?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:53 pm to
quote:


So his rates should go down in a sea of low risk drivers no?


Not when he is one of the few high risk drivers out there. Self driving car manufacturers will probably be providing insurance based on hardware/software costs.. they won't be covering trucknut Joe in his f250
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76527 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:56 pm to
No.

You drive around more dangerous conditions, times and drivers it goes up.

Better conditions, times and drivers it goes down.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90774 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:56 pm to
quote:


Not when he is one of the few high risk drivers out there. Self driving car manufacturers will probably be providing insurance based on hardware/software costs.. they won't be covering trucknut Joe in his f250
Accidents go down. in theory everyone's insurance should go down, you in your Yugo part Deaux will go down more.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8646 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

quote:

So his rates should go down in a sea of low risk drivers no?


Not when he is one of the few high risk drivers out there. Self driving car manufacturers will probably be providing insurance based on hardware/software costs.. they won't be covering trucknut Joe in his f250


You don't understand the risk pools very well then, assuming a functioning market.

Let's say there are $100,000 in payouts every year in a given risk pool to cover 100 non-automated and CV cars. The average premium will be roughly $1,100 per car annually assuming a roughly 9% margin for the insurer.

Let's say 40% of that market converts to EV and automated vehicles. That chunk of payouts approaches zero. Great - they get siphoned off into different risk pools where they pay near-zero premiums.

You are, unfortunately, making the leap that the remaining set of drivers would automatically be charged higher prices because of adverse selection (like in healthcare). That would almost certainly not be the case, and I'd be fairly safe in my assumption that driver behavior and risk profile of those who choose to remain in non-automated CV vehicles in this scenario will actually be quite a bit better than it is for the total pool today - the pool would almost certainly tilt a bit older, a safer and more conservative driver, and a knowledgeable vehicle operator.

Thus, premiums for automated EV drivers: somewhere in the $100 - 200 range annually. Premiums for non-automated CV drivers: $400 - $700 annually.

Isn't it beautiful?

For the record, USAA, Geico, and everyone else knows this is coming.
This post was edited on 11/26/18 at 2:08 pm
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26351 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Gasoline currently costs about 1.64 euros a liter in Paris ($7.06 a gallon), slightly more than diesel.

Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8646 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:31 pm to
Still waiting on an answer on this.
Posted by Norbert
Member since Oct 2018
3700 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Ahhh...lol...businesses would friggin love that...


Not to mention it would have a negligible impact on climate change, to the tune of about 1-2 degrees over a century... best case scenario.

This post was edited on 11/27/18 at 3:00 pm
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17502 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Thankfully over the last few years china has began enforcing fairly stringent air and water quality protections 10-15 years from now you won't be driving around in an f250.. you probably won't be driving at all your small and smart EV will do that for you


And in 1975 we were going to be all electric by 2000.

And if ford is selling F250s and electric econoboxes are sitting on the lot unsold, what is going to happen to the manufacturing of the electric econoboxes?? The manufacturing of Ford F250s?

Tesla would be bankrupt if not for subsidies, the little electric crapbox carmaker located in Tunica county, MS is bankrupt and has closed up shop, the Chevy Volt is discontinued...

Meanwhile how are truck and SUV sales been going?
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
17137 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Really much more simple to subsidize fuel purchases and slowly decrease the amount subsidized over time.

Throw in some incentives to purchase electric vehicles too.

Ideally we would only tax businesses on their pollution/environmental impact and not on earnings




Or they could send the environmentalists who propose such things to the guillotine.

Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8626 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Accident prone driver in a sea of self-driving low risk vehicles. Seems obvious.


So when these self driven computer programmed vehicles have a glitch, what will insurance companies do?
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8626 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Self driving car manufacturers will probably be providing insurance based on hardware/software costs.. they won't be covering trucknut Joe in his f250


What is your daily soy consumption?
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17502 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Is it tyranny if it is market driven?


You are saying this while saying that people not driving self driving cars will have their insurance raised? After accidents go down, presumably, from self driving cars?

You have zero clue on how the free market works. At the very least you believe in placing a thumb on the scale by government. And if that happens... someone will run on reversing it and will win.

Less accidents means cheaper insurance. For all. Period. If a soy CEO of an ins company says he will raise rates on non-self driving, autonomous, cars... all others will offer reduced rates based on the drop in risk.

What will the soy CEO do then? Correct answer is drop rates to compete or die.

That is how the market works. Always has, always will.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram