- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The devastation of Helene has laid bare the fricked up priorities of the US government
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's impossible to answer, but it's still insignificant to the discussion of our spending problem.
A person calling Dave Ramey who is $2M in debt isn't going to be productive asking if he should pick up a penny off the ground as a method of combating his debt. Would it TECHNICALLY help? Sure. I mean, what's the appropriate amount of potential revenue to waste in that scenario?
This kind of thinking is completely broken. You sound like Nancy Pelosi actually. A bleeding vagina willing to do anything but help the people of this country in preference to some random nation that launders money for the current admin.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 10:55 am
1
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Says the person arguing over the "difference" between normal appropriation bills and CRs.
quote:???
Wrong.
quote:
I'm arguing over the difference in budgets and spending bills/CRs.
Where am I "wrong". 
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:55 am to beerJeep
quote:
Why do you put military at the top when it’s the least expensive of the 4?
And literally the only one mentioned in the Constitution.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:57 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
If it's "insignificant to our spending problem" you clearly think it's acceptable.
No that's not logical. It's -EV to discuss in the big picture.
In no way does that imply it's acceptable. That's your logical issue/bad interpretation.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:58 am to clacker
quote:
willing to do anything but help the people of this country in preference to some random nation that launders money for the current admin.
Not displaying partisan brain rot at all, I see.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:58 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Where am I "wrong".
appropriations bills and CRs are much more similar than either are to a full budget without extraneous spending options.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not displaying partisan brain rot at all, I see.
The truth too much to take?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:59 am to beerJeep
quote:
Why do you put military at the top when it’s the least expensive of the 4?
The listing was not a ranking of order.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 10:59 am to clacker
quote:
The truth too much to take?
No, but you did not post "truth"
I am awaiting you claiming FTX funneled that money, next.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No, but you did not post "truth"
I am awaiting you claiming FTX funneled that money, next.
You are a leftist and an apologist for the Biden/Harris/Obama regime. Fool.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So they're coming from the same budgets? This is silly.
You are one dumb motherfricker.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So they're coming from the same budgets?
I remember an idiot telling me that the money New Orleans spent was wise policy at the time.
I said that they should use that money to mitigate flooding concerns.
New Orleans doesn’t have those statues…now, about that flooding.
This is a similar scenario to the Federal government wasting money on virtue signaling.
There is no logical defense of these stupid policy decisions.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In no way does that imply it's acceptable. That's your logical issue/bad interpretation.
quote:
A person calling Dave Ramey who is $2M in debt isn't going to be productive asking if he should pick up a penny off the ground as a method of combating his debt. Would it TECHNICALLY help? Sure. I mean, what's the appropriate amount of potential revenue to waste in that scenario?
What's truly intersting is, by your own "logic" our Congress cares so little for homeland security they spend an "insignificant" amount on it.
Yet... oddly Mitch McConnell calls Ukraine aid one the most important legislative victories of his career. LINK . Odd innnit?
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
appropriations bills and CRs are much more similar than either are to a full budget without extraneous spending options.
You could have just said "you werent'"
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I am awaiting you claiming FTX funneled that money, next.
The quote below is from the right wing rag Time Magazine
quote:
Bankman-Fried contributed more than $70 million to election campaigns in less than 18 months, placing him among the nation’s top political donors. He personally gave at least $40 million to politicians and political action committees ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, mostly to Democrats and liberal-leaning groups, making him the second overall top donor to Democrats, only behind George Soros, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:07 am to BigPerm30
quote:
quote:
I am awaiting you claiming FTX funneled that money, next.
The quote below is from the right wing rag Time Magazine
quote:
Bankman-Fried contributed more than $70 million to election campaigns in less than 18 months, placing him among the nation’s top political donors. He personally gave at least $40 million to politicians and political action committees ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, mostly to Democrats and liberal-leaning groups, making him the second overall top donor to Democrats, only behind George Soros, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
SFP knew this. they/them is just being a troll and purposefully obtuse
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:27 am to BigPerm30
quote:
Bankman-Fried contributed more than $70 million to election campaigns in less than 18 months, placing him among the nation’s top political donors. He personally gave at least $40 million to politicians and political action committees ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, mostly to Democrats and liberal-leaning groups, making him the second overall top donor to Democrats, only behind George Soros, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Where was Ukraine in that quote?
For reference, this is what led to the FTX question
quote:
some random nation that launders money for the current admin.
This post was edited on 9/29/24 at 11:28 am
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Where was Ukraine in that quote?
You said Clacker was being partisan and that the next partisan talking point was going to be FTX was also funneling/laundering money to the Democrats. GTFO with your shite. You’re nothing but a troll. I open debate with open and honest people about politics. You guys all have the talking points down but no facts.
Posted on 9/29/24 at 11:41 am to udtiger
quote:
Yet, because of the hundreds of billions pissed away in Ukraine and coddling illegals (or "TRS"), there is almost NOTHING available from the feds for this.
In your drug addled mind perhaps. But reality doesn’t support your spouting
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News