- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:19 pm to TX Tiger
Really so tell me champ. Distance to target has no difference?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:21 pm to TX Tiger
So you claim no training new guy
Less than Two seconds to decide shoot u in the face?
Experience is fungible!
Less than Two seconds to decide shoot u in the face?
Experience is fungible!
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:21 pm to djsdawg
quote:Well, of course it's irrelevant to her death. No lawsuit or firing is going to bring her back. But moving forward, we can't have LO acting like Gestapo. Unless, of course, you are an advocate of a Police State. You're not are you?
Agree. To flee, not to run over the officer.
.
.
2. Agree or not, it’s irrelevant either way.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:22 pm to Jbird
quote:If it's the first time, sure. Why do you think they go though training?
Really so tell me champ. Distance to target has no difference?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:23 pm to TX Tiger
Ok she backed up to get an acceleration advantage.
Why are you babbling bullshite?
Why are you babbling bullshite?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:26 pm to Jbird
quote:So, if your goal is to run someone over, you believe that the first move is to back up.
Ok she backed up to get an acceleration advantage.
Got it.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:26 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
By not grabbing the door handle to yank them out of the car.
She was being detained after she escalated the situation.
quote:
They were shouting conflicting instructions as they approached the vehicle. Not before.
Don’t say wrong when you have already admitted you didn’t know about their orders:
Before they got out, their order was to leave. She escalated by refusing
Once they got out of the car, the order was to get out of the car. She escalated by refusing.
These instructions were clear and easy to understand.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:29 pm to djsdawg
quote:How did she escalate the situation?
By not grabbing the door handle to yank them out of the car.
She was being detained after she escalated the situation.
quote:How did they give an order from inside their vehicle?
Before they got out, their order was to leave.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:31 pm to TX Tiger
No I am saying she needed that acceleration some were babbling about.
Now if your arse was in front of my Silverado I wouldn't need it.
Now if your arse was in front of my Silverado I wouldn't need it.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:34 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I’m just pointing out what will likely be brought up in legal proceedings
Not by anyone who actually went to law school.
Her.Intent.Is.Irrelevant
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:39 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
How did she escalate the situation?
By not leaving when they first told her to.
quote:
How did they give an order from inside their vehicle?
Rolling the window down. Crazy concept to you?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:44 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Well, of course it's irrelevant to her death. No lawsuit or firing is going to bring her back. But moving forward, we can't have LO acting like Gestapo. Unless, of course, you are an advocate of a Police State. You're not are you?
“They are literally nazis!!!!”
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:51 pm to jammajin
quote:
SWEEP THE LEG !!
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:53 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
De-escalation Mandate: Current ICE Use of Force policies (updated as of 2023 and continuing through 2026) instruct officers to prioritize de-escalation techniques and only use force when no "safe and feasible alternative" is available.
And what were his options when she hit the gas?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 5:53 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
So, if your goal is to run someone over, you believe that the first move is to back up.
How stupid is this point? That's like saying: "your goal is to punch someone, so your first move is to cock your fist back?"
Posted on 1/14/26 at 6:27 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
When that video first shows her through the windshield, she is looking out the driver-side window. We then see her turning both her head and the steering wheel to her right (camera left). We never see her look back in the direction of the agent, as I recall.
Video from agents perspective
From 1:34-1:36 she is looking at him before she hits him. 2 solid seconds she’s looking right at him. She backs up while looking at him and then accelerates forward all while staring him down.
This is undeniable and undebatable.
Care to amend your position?
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 6:29 pm to Robin Masters
No chuckle nuts is invested.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 6:39 pm to Jbird
Anyone denying she intend to hit him after watching that video is a disciple level true believer.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 6:41 pm to Robin Masters
They are clowns
Page 27 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News