- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The definitive video showing Good's vehicle striking the agent
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:45 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:45 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I doubt it.
The cell phone video from the agent who shot her confirms you are (as usual) incorrect.
1
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:47 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
He used deadly force Was she intending to kill him?
She was intending to drive through him, again if you want to argue she didn't think that would kill him, given she's obviously a moron, that's certainly possible.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:49 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
There are several cars in the area. Are they all deadly? Why didn’t he shoot those drivers?
I skipped over this gem of a comment
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:51 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
just don’t know if they can prove that she was trying to use her vehicle with deadly force. The video didn’t look like she was.
Either she accelerated towards the LEO or she didn’t.
We can all see that she DID.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:54 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
There are several cars in the area. Are they all deadly? Why didn’t he shoot those drivers?
Those drivers clearly didnt put themselves in the situation shaved head lady did.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:55 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:You think that particular video somehow establishes that she saw this agent? OK
But she definitely saw him when she gunned her car through him.
I doubt it.quote:The cell phone video from the agent who shot her confirms you are (as usual) incorrect.
I think she was probably focused upon the other agent, who was trying to get into her driver-side window. She does not strike me as a person with a lot of situational-awareness
I reviewed the video, and what I saw was her looking to her left (out the driver's side window), then rapidly turning her head to her right (she seems to be looking well to her right of the agent's viewpoint) while turning the steering wheel in that direction and then starting to move the vehicle forward and to her right (his left).
Would her eyes have brushed past the agent in front-left of her car? Sure, but (again) she does not strike me as a person with much situational awareness. It would not surprise me in the least if she did not notice him. She was CERTAINLY looking far to his left (her right) when the vehicle started moving forward and to her right (his left).
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:56 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I just don’t know if they can prove that she was trying to use her vehicle with deadly force. The video didn’t look like she was.
Completely irrelevant. Despite this assertion being objectively false….it doesn’t matter. You’ve been told this many times. Why do you ignore the clear language of the law?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:58 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I doubt it.
I think she was probably focused upon the other agent, who was trying to get into her driver-side window. She does not strike me as a person with a lot of situational-awareness.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:59 pm to BBONDS25
Why do you ignore the clear language of the law?
well, duh, because it doesn't fit the narrative they want to create.
well, duh, because it doesn't fit the narrative they want to create.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:00 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I didn’t see any. But certainly they could have right? They’re deadly….
Oof. If this is the level of argument you’re going to make you might as well pack it in. This is just pathetic.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:02 pm to Jbird
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:19 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Why do you ignore the clear language of the law?
He's just fricking with everyone. If not, I feel bad for him and should probably lay off
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:55 pm to djsdawg
quote:I have a couple of questions
Either she accelerated towards the LEO or she didn’t.
We can all see that she DID.
1. If her intention was to run over him, why didn't she do it when he TWICE walked directly in front of the vehicle with no chance to escape? Why would she have waited to run him down?
2. Why did she initially BACK UP before trying to drive away? Could it be that she was intentionally trying to AVOID hitting him? What other reason do you think there could be for her backing up before driving away?
3. What do you think that she thought she would accomplish by running over that ICE officer?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:57 pm to TX Tiger
quote:4. Is there actually anyone out there so dumb as to contend that she INTENDED to hit the agent?
1. If her intention was to run over him, why didn't she do it when he TWICE walked directly in front of the vehicle with no chance to escape? Why would she have waited to run him down?
2. Why did she initially BACK UP before trying to drive away? Could it be that she was intentionally trying to AVOID hitting him? What other reason do you think there could be for her backing up before driving away?
3. What do you think that she thought she would accomplish by running over that ICE officer?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:19 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
5. why do you keep talking about her intentions when it's been explained to you 1000 times that her intentions were lost in the back seat with the dog when her brain landed there.
Had she gotten out of her car when she was instructed to do so be LE we could all get a great insight into what her intentions are and were.
had she not put the ICE officer in a position of feeling his life was threatened by putting her weapon in drive and accelerating toward him (and striking him) he would not have pulled out his weapon and put her brains in the back seat.
then we could discuss with her what her intentions were from the moment she woke up, until the moment she parked perpendicular in the road, let her wildebeest wife out to taunt LEO and started blowing her horn and dancing in the front seat. but she had to get out of the car and comply in order to have that happen. Instead she decided to turn her vehicle into a weapon and made her intentions irrelevant.
what she intended doesn't and didn't matter. You and Txtiger both know this or have had it explained to you. You continue to ignore it because it doesn't serve the purpose you want in the narrative you both want to create.
Had she gotten out of her car when she was instructed to do so be LE we could all get a great insight into what her intentions are and were.
had she not put the ICE officer in a position of feeling his life was threatened by putting her weapon in drive and accelerating toward him (and striking him) he would not have pulled out his weapon and put her brains in the back seat.
then we could discuss with her what her intentions were from the moment she woke up, until the moment she parked perpendicular in the road, let her wildebeest wife out to taunt LEO and started blowing her horn and dancing in the front seat. but she had to get out of the car and comply in order to have that happen. Instead she decided to turn her vehicle into a weapon and made her intentions irrelevant.
what she intended doesn't and didn't matter. You and Txtiger both know this or have had it explained to you. You continue to ignore it because it doesn't serve the purpose you want in the narrative you both want to create.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:26 pm to jammajin
quote:Well done. Your wall of text failed to answer even one of the questions posed. 10/10 evasion.
Had she gotten out of her car when she was instructed to do so be LE we could all get a great insight into what her intentions are and were.
had she not put the ICE officer in a position of feeling his life was threatened by putting her weapon in drive and accelerating toward him (and striking him) he would not have pulled out his weapon and put her brains in the back seat.
then we could discuss with her what her intentions were from the moment she woke up, until the moment she parked perpendicular in the road, let her wildebeest wife out to taunt LEO and started blowing her horn and dancing in the front seat. but she had to get out of the car and comply in order to have that happen. Instead she decided to turn her vehicle into a weapon and made her intentions irrelevant.
what she intended doesn't and didn't matter. You and Txtiger both know this or have had it explained to you. You continue to ignore it because it doesn't serve the purpose you want in the narrative you both want to create.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:29 pm to TX Tiger
your questions are irrelevant. you know that. you are trying to deflect with your questions. you are using a dead woman and what she may or may not have intended as a pawn in your sick attempt to score political points.
but you care deeply about her, we know.
but you care deeply about her, we know.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:30 pm to TX Tiger
7 if her wife wouldn't have yelled drove honey she might be alive.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:33 pm to Jbird
quote:
7 if her wife wouldn't have yelled drove honey she might be alive.
TX does not believe the wife said that. Despite the audio proof. He says “why would she say that when she was trying to get in the car.” He also said the officer wasn’t hit and that the officer should have shot out the tires.
He is likely a pretty good dude. Just not all that bright and prone to needing to feel like he has some insight nobody else does to make him feel smarter.
I hate to call him a conspiracy theorist because so many things labeled “conspiracy” by the left have been proven to be true. But I don’t think there is a single conspiracy he won’t jump on.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 3:34 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
4. Is there actually anyone out there so dumb as to contend that she INTENDED to hit the agent?
That isn’t a dumb assertion. She did in fact hit him. Once again…her intention is irrelevant.
Page 23 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News