Started By
Message

re: The Decline of Coal

Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:49 pm to
Posted by BiteMe2020
Texas
Member since Nov 2020
7284 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

and that is bad, for them... but they will move past it as they implement solar increasingly... the threat is that they pass us up so far in solar that we can't compete.

GM just changed its marketing, logo and focus onto electric vehicles. Change can't be stopped at a certain point... and we're past that point.


Liberal wet dreams.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3460 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

So tell us what happens when Joe bans fracking.

Where are you going to get all of your cheap natural gas?



joe is not going to ban fracking... he is going to limit "new" additional fracking... the fracking in place will continue.

But fracking sucks. Ask people that live around where it happens. Nothing like having flammable water come out of your taps.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28158 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:50 pm to
Someone in the thread drives a wind powered vehicle or will gladly sell you solar panels for your house....
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

and that is bad, for them... but they will move past it as they implement solar increasingly... the threat is that they pass us up so far in solar that we can't compete.

GM just changed its marketing, logo and focus onto electric vehicles. Change can't be stopped at a certain point... and we're past that point.


LOL

The whole green energy shite is a lie, or about 95% a lie. Even man boobs Michael Moore figured it out.

The whole carbon shite is scam. There is pollution of course, but carbon isn't one of them. What happened is over 20-30 years things like coal technology was able to reduce the amounts of real pollution down to almost nothing. Although, places like China are not even interested in these restrictions.

The scam had to move to carbon.

Don't get me wrong, there is things with coal that must be contained like coal ash. But 99% of this green energy shite is scam especially with present battery tech.



Posted by SmileyVamp
Member since Dec 2020
96 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Coal is not cost-effective, anymore. It's dead. Natural Gas is much cheaper to extract and much cheaper to burn and is what killed it, as far as America goes.

There have been major pursuits to make coal more viable for the future. There was the development of a carbon-capture coal power plant in Mississippi called the Kemper Project. Unfortunately, that has been canceled due to vast increasing costs.

For natural gas, carbon capture is seeing better results with a zero-emissions gas plant being in development and showing promise.

Source:LINK

Source:LINK
This post was edited on 1/12/21 at 12:56 pm
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3460 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Liberal wet dreams.


... from the fine folks at General Motors.

ABC News: New campaign, and logo, for GM in a bid to electrify image

General Motors is changing its corporate logo and launching an electric vehicle marketing campaign to reshape its image as clean vehicle company, rather than a builder of gas-powered pickups and SUVs
Posted by dbbuilder79
Overton NV
Member since Dec 2010
4570 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:55 pm to
Solar has it's advantages and disadvantages. The tech is moving so fast, now, that plants from even 5 years ago are using obsolete tech.

Personally, I'd love to see regulations that require houses of certain square footage to have solar. If someone can afford a $700,000 house, they can afford $25,000-$30,000 in solar tiles.

I know it's not a popular opinion, but if coal is being replaced by solar (which is why california is having massive brown-outs), they need to figure out the best way to take pressure off the grid.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

There was the development of a carbon-capture coal power plant in Mississippi called the Kemper Project.


That's the new scam... carbon is pollution. Everything on this planet will eventually burn because it has a molten core.

There are underground coal fires that go on for 1,000s of years.

All coal, oil, trees, natural gas, etc. will one day burn.
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3146 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

and that is bad, for them... but they will move past it as they implement solar increasingly... the threat is that they pass us up so far in solar that we can't compete.

California has humongous amounts of solar power. So much; in fact, that they have too much of it.

Solar is not the solution. Better batteries is. Until we can store energy better, solar will continue to have large problems.
This post was edited on 1/12/21 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84100 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

If someone can afford a $700,000 house, they can afford $25,000-$30,000 in solar tiles.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3460 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

There have been major pursuits to make coal more viable for the future. There was the development of a carbon-capture coal power plant in Mississippi called the Kemper Project. Unfortunately, that has been canceled due to vast increasing costs.


yeah... the cost-effectiveness just isn't there, ultimately, no matter what they try... and it's awful and filthy and creates so many other problems, especially for the people who work to extract it, health-wise... it's just not worth it.

We have a lot of natural gas. It doesn't need to come from fracking... it's almost really just a by-product of that process being used to extract oil and shale, right? (I'm not in the field... I have friends who are Chemical Engineers working in it or geologists working in research and discovery)
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

How many solar panels does it take to equal the production of 1 nuclear reactor?




Fuel Type/Energy Density(MJ/kg)
Wood/16
Coal/24
Ethanol/26.8
Biodiesel/38
Crude oil/44
Diesel/45
Gasoline/46
Natural gas/55
Uranium-235/3,900,000

Before I get to the energy density of solar please pay attention to the units I used above...mega-joules per kilogram or MJ/kg.

Now for solar:

1.5 microjoules per square meter. Micro is 10^-6.

So for a solar farm to equal one kg of Uranium you will need 2.6 billion square kilometers of solar panels to equal the energy output of one kg of uranium for its lifetime.

LINK

Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Solar has it's advantages and disadvantages. The tech is moving so fast, now, that plants from even 5 years ago are using obsolete tech.

Personally, I'd love to see regulations that require houses of certain square footage to have solar. If someone can afford a $700,000 house, they can afford $25,000-$30,000 in solar tiles.

I know it's not a popular opinion, but if coal is being replaced by solar (which is why california is having massive brown-outs), they need to figure out the best way to take pressure off the grid.


For large energy production with solar or wind in most places in the world doesn't make sense as its not viable. Than once you put in that you have to support the whole grid which in the United States expands large areas.... its an impossibility.

The honest green people will admit this, the others are just trying to make an easy buck.

Don't get me wrong we use solar but not because its viable large scale, for independence.... its very costly.

Posted by southern686
Narnia
Member since Nov 2015
1021 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

ather live next door to a field full of solar panels than a nuclear power plant


You do realize all of the fossil fuels needed to create/run your solar power universe is probably more harmful than a nuclear plant.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

carbon capture is seeing better results with a zero-emissions gas plant being in development and showing promise.


This is the way the industry is going.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3460 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

If someone can afford a $700,000 house, they can afford $25,000-$30,000 in solar tiles.


And Tesla;s solar tiles are roofing tiles... so you just pay for solar when you get a roof, and I think their tiles will last longer as roof tiles than roofing tiles, do... though I worry the photovoltaic element wears out before the roof does.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

California has humongous amounts of solar power. So much; in fact, that they have too much of it.

Solar is not the solution. Better batteries is. Until we can store energy better, solar will continue to have large problems.


Unless they get batteries which are cost effective and last 30 years, they'll tap out real quick like CA.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58283 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

U.S. coal-fired power plants closing fast
thats all on obama.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3460 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

You do realize all of the fossil fuels needed to create/run your solar power universe is probably more harmful than a nuclear plant.




Why can't they be created with the existing nuclear power plants supplying the energy?
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58283 posts
Posted on 1/12/21 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Coal is not cost-effective, anymore. It's dead.
are you joking? it isnt cost effective because of the restrictions of super clean burning that Obama imposed is what is killing it.

quote:

Natural Gas is much cheaper to extract and much cheaper to burn and is what killed it, as far as America goes.


there is over 200 years worth of coal for electricity on America soil.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram