re: The “cheating” claims are no better than the calls for more programs after horrible crimes

quote:

---

Wut?

Solid non sequitur ...

---

If they cheated in 2020 and 2026 why did they hand the Rs the presidency and Congress in 2024?

quote:

---

Because of the 1.7 million votes the democrats got that was above the numbers compared to the last three elections... The republicans got the same votes compared to the last three elections... Actually the republicans got about 100,000 more votes then the last election...So republicans didn't stay home.. About 1.4 million people moved to Texas (not all voting age) from 2022 to 2026 not all registered to vote and not all registered as democrats... And that number includes new births born in Texas...

---

Nothing in your post explains how they could have perpetrated this fraud in Texas

You're just posting random numbers and trying to amplify significance when the numbers have nothing to do with my question

quote:

---

293,500

---

And how many of the statewide elections would would this total have swung if it went 100% to the DEMs?

quote:

---

Nothing in your post explains how they could have perpetrated this fraud in Texas

You're just posting random numbers and trying to amplify significance when the numbers have nothing to do with my question

---

Their heads would explode if they saw the difference in voter participation between 2014 and 2018 in Texas

quote:

---

... yep, its that simple, Simple Jack.

---

There has been only one attempt to actually explain the mechanics of this cheating in TX, and it was this:

quote:

---

They didn't actually cheat ...

They did what is legally allowed in the law (no Texas does not have the Save Act ... contrary to SFP bullshite postings) ...

Basically, mail in voting has corrupted elections beyond functional democracy ...

---

And with only 300k votes in total for MIV, that argument is now dead to explain the cheating/fraud in TX

quote:

---

Their heads would explode if they saw the difference in voter participation between 2014 and 2018 in Texas

---

Probably.

A lot of these people are political neophytes who started following in 2016 or 2019 and, sadly, listen to dishonest X content creators to learn about politics

quote:

---

That's the start of how the "legal" fraud occurs ...

---

How did the 1M or so other "Fraudulent" votes get through in TX?

Again, remember my comment above was just do dismiss his bad argument. 100% of those 300k certainly did not go to the DEMs, and I would be shocked if it was over half

quote:

---

Your simpleton approach to arguing isn't worth any more posts here ...

---

You haven't even made a point to argue with. You refuse to explain this purported fraud/cheating scheme in TX

You mean 2014 when photo ID was initiated?

That’s gonna be your argument against fraud?

Wanna rethink and retry?

quote:

---

You haven't even made a point to argue with. You refuse to explain this purported fraud/cheating scheme in TX

---

It's pretty easy to cheat with mail in balloting depending on the state laws and the contracts with machine vendors that prevent thorough audits.

The problem is state laws and the contracts make it very difficult to find evidence of cheating and that's by design. The only evidence is statistical anomoly's. Heck, they even shred and throw away crucial evidence like the envelopes with the signatures as fast as they can in these elections. If that is not a big red flag I don't know what is? The machine vendors put in their contracts that you cannot audit their code as well, another huge Red flag.

Statistics are literally how all fraud investigations start in Business and Industry as well, by the way. When the numbers don't make sense, something is up. The problem is fraud is generally never easy to prove, takes a lot of investigation. If it was easy to prove then the fraudsters probably would not do it, right?

quote:

---

You just made the point that a sample size of 3 is statistically relevant ...

---

wut