Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

The CDC changed its definition of vaccination to increase transparency, fact-checkers say

Posted on 2/10/22 at 7:52 am
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182542 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 7:52 am
Oh, the fact checkers say then it must be correct

quote:

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told the Associated Press that the agency changed its definition of vaccination to add more detail and increase transparency. “The latest CDC definition is absent the word ‘immunity’ and just focuses on the stimulation of the body’s immune response,” Verify reports. A spokesperson for the CDC told AP and Verify that the overall definition of both “vaccine” and “vaccination” has remained the same. “‘The previous definition…could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine, so the current definition is more transparent,’” the spokesperson said. Vaccines for COVID-19 continue to be safe and effective, according to public health and medical experts.



I remember a certain brain dead POTUS saying you would be 100% immune if you took the vaccine.


Experts say changes to CDC’s vaccination definition are normal
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62082 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 7:55 am to
quote:

The previous definition…could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine,



That’s odd, because I remember Brandon saying,” if you get the vaccine, you won’t get covid.”
This post was edited on 2/10/22 at 7:56 am
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24496 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 7:57 am to
WRONG.

As many of us having been saying for about a year now, they changed the definition of the word "vaccine" so that the fraudulent c*cksuckers who made and promoted this f*cking POISON would have full f*cking IMMUNITY.

That didn't stop the ignorant f*cking BRAINDEAD AND BRAINWASHED militant vaxxers from calling us liars, conspiracy theorist, misinformation disseminators, etc.
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
8447 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 8:05 am to
quote:

The previous definition…could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective


Let me fix it with some truth;

The previous definition…could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were effective, a definition we cannot apply to these C19 shots.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98273 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 8:07 am to
quote:

I remember a certain brain dead POTUS saying you would be 100% immune if you took the vaccine.





"I mean cmon bro thats not what he really meant to say and you muh know it" - want brigade
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115483 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 8:09 am to


As Rush always noted, the left seeks to make words meaningless by constantly changing meanings
Posted by idsrdum
Member since Jan 2017
624 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 8:11 am to
Wonder if they also have plans to change the definitions of safe and effective?

Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104096 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 8:12 am to
Orwell called that back in 1948.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28287 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 9:02 am to
Yep and it was NEVER a vaccination to begin with.

It is a inoculation and even that is a stretch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram