re: The Candace Owens theory about Macron is now claiming he married his own trans dad

quote:

---

how is this thread 5 pages long?

---

Because Macron is a weird weird dude and his wife is probably a tranny.

Her point was that the family tree is convoluted.

Watch the full vid.

You're a misinformation merchant

quote:

---

Her point was that the family tree is convoluted.

Watch the full vid.

---

Without delving too deeply into the known facts on this matter, there is a peculiar, multifaceted psychosexual drama surrounding Macron’s marriage. Anyone who denies that are the real kooks in this discussion.

With that said, I am by no stretch of the imagination a special pleader for Candace Owens. Indeed, what I little I know about her largely is based on the discussion about her on this very forum.

I further was not at all familiar with her pet theory on this matter. I thus watched the video epilogue on “Becoming Brigitte” simply to see what Candace herself said.

Although some of the theories Owens discusses certainly appear outlandish, Candace Owens also poses relevant questions regarding the history of the French presidential couple and the historical social milieu from which they emerged. In that context, the following quote is not remotely controversial and indeed seems perfectly reasonable:

“It is plausible that all of these people have multiple identities. If you’ve got somebody in the family that can destroy identities and create identities why wouldn’t you use that to your advantage?

I also think it’s important to think about the time frame. It was a different world — during World War I or World War II — we are talking about humans moving over National lines.

Nations changing — literally geographical changes — that were happening depending on who won Wars or who lost Wars. You had people who were hiding their true identities, sometimes out of a necessity, out of fear of persecution, you have to completely change your identity and hide in different countries.

We know for a fact that within this particular story — despite
what we’re being sold as the public — at least one side of the family changed their names or or had one member who changed their names. Amel Rothchild said that nothing was more important than the family and that meant — at any cost — it was about preserving the unity of the bank and the integrity of the name.

There is no question there is an enormous amount of mental health issues that ran in the family. I can’t believe there’s not a correlation between these endogamous matches and the issues of mental health.”