re: The Biden admin scrubbed all wildfire data prior to 1983.

The entire Green movement is based on misleading statistical information, usually depicted in graphs. The timeframe (a.k.a denominator, and is usually the horizontal bottom line on a graph) can be skewed to appear positive or negative depending on the timeframe.
I just saw a graft of gas prices that Biden was touting, but the problem was that it encompassed the last 2 months! Just imagine the difference in that one and one showing the entire time he's been in office.
All that to say that over 1000s of years, science has shown us that the earth has cooled down AND heated up several times!
Don't be conned by these sky-screamers with an agenda!

if you drive along i10 towards mobile before the hotter months come around, they do controlled burns all along there.

They cut off the arctic ice cap around 1980 too. Why? Because it was lower than it is today in the 70’s

quote:

---

The problem with this conspiracy theory is that if that was really their goal,

---

There is no conspiracy theory. The Biden administration wants us to know that wildfire are getting worse. Just google wildfire frequency and these charts are raised to the top of the search results all starting in 1983:



Sorry, as much as you would like to discredit this thread with "conspiracy theory" ad hominem these are just the observable facts. The Biden admin is hiding pre-1983 wildfire data.

If they feel like pre-1983 data and post-1983 data are not the same then annotate charts stating the difference but don't erase it.

quote:

---

Sorry, as much as you would like to discredit this thread with "conspiracy theory" ad hominem

---

It’s not an ad hominem. You made the statement claiming they are scrubbing it. Which you “proved” by providing evidence that they didn’t scrub it, in a medium that it could have easily been done even without evoking any power of government.

There was no personal attack. Assuming all events are part of a unified orchestrated plot is the definition of a conspiracy theory.

Especially when citing disparate organizations colluding to the same goal.

Especially as you keep using words like “scrubbed” or “erased” rather than the more accurate term that can fit the same story you are claiming of “suppressed” Apparently it’s not just the left that are prone to hyperbolic and dramatic statements.

I’ll agree it’s awfully convenient of the break being where it is…..but there is an objective reason for the threshold, made decades before Biden’s presidency. That reality can’t be discounted. For instance, one could argue their climate case would be far stronger making the break to be in the 1950s, to imply that the trend is consistently low, if pure data obscuring was the goal.

Finding evidence supporting your view doesn’t prove it. You can only disprove the alternatives.

That's probably dumber than all of Hillarys staff smashing phones with hammers.